Passive compliance versus active compliance in robot‐based automated assembly systems

Industrial robots have found great potential in applications to assembly‐line automation. Programmable robot‐based assembly systems are often needed, in particular for circumstances in which special assembly equipments is not available or well‐trained operators could not be employed economically. Robots with enough compliance can perform not only classic automation tasks, such as spot welding, cargo carrying, etc., but also can operate those tasks which demand the compliant motion capacity of robots. Therefore, the research on robot compliance is especially important for parts assembly by robots, where robot compliant motions and manipulations are essential requirements. This paper presents a number of important issues in robot compliance research, including the specification of robot end‐effector compliance; properties of a robot compliance matrix at its end‐effector; discussions on passive compliance and active compliance and their comparisons; and derivation of the compliance at the end‐effector required for tasks.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[2]  C. S. G. Lee,et al.  Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Intelligence , 1987 .

[3]  W. Thomson Theory of vibration with applications , 1965 .

[4]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Passive Robotics: An Exploration of Mechanical Computation , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[5]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Compliance and Force Control for Computer Controlled Manipulators , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of components for programmable passive impedance , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  J. Salisbury,et al.  Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[8]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Quasi-Static Assembly of Compliantly Supported Rigid Parts , 1982 .

[9]  Marcelo H. Ang,et al.  Specifying and achieving passive compliance based on manipulator structure , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  Synthesis and validation of nondiagonal accommodation matrices for error-corrective assembly , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[12]  Michael A. Peshkin,et al.  Admittance matrix design for force-guided assembly , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[13]  Josip Loncaric,et al.  Normal forms of stiffness and compliance matrices , 1987, IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Gerry B. Andeen Robot design handbook , 1988 .