Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures

We investigated under which conditions sequence learning in a serial reaction time task can be based on perceptual learning. A replication of the study of Mayr (1996) confirmed perceptual and motor learning when sequences were learned concurrently. However, between-participants manipulations of the motor and perceptual sequences only supported motor learning in cases of more complex deterministic and probabilistic sequence structures. Perceptual learning using a between-participants design could only be established with a simple deterministic sequence structure. The results seem to imply that perceptual learning can be facilitated by a concurrently learned motor sequence. Possibly, concurrent learning releases necessary attentional resources or induces a structured learning condition under which perceptual learning can take place. Alternatively, the underlying mechanism may rely on binding between the perceptual and motor sequences.

[1]  E. Soetens,et al.  The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[3]  E. Soetens,et al.  Sequence learning and sequential effects , 2004, Psychological research.

[4]  P. Frensch,et al.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Thomas F. Münte,et al.  Influence of Stimulus Distance in Implicit Learning of Spatial and Nonspatial Event Sequences , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[7]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  T Kleinsorge,et al.  Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  M. Ziessler.  The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning , 1994, Psychological research.

[10]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Negative priming and sequence learning , 2002 .

[11]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  A M Burton,et al.  Learning complex sequences: no role for observation? , 2001, Psychological research.

[13]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task , 1997 .

[14]  D. Howard,et al.  Serial pattern learning by event observation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  M. Ziessler,et al.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Handbook of implicit learning , 1998 .

[18]  P. Frensch,et al.  Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. , 1994 .

[19]  I Koch,et al.  Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  B. Hommel.  Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[21]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task , 1998 .

[22]  F Rösler,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Effects of sequence length and structure on implicit serial learning , 1997 .

[24]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[26]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Neural Substrates of Response-based Sequence Learning using fMRI , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Peter Bullemer,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989 .

[28]  G. Remillard.  Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Thomas Goschke,et al.  Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences: Evidence for independent learning systems. , 1998 .

[30]  Michael Ziessler,et al.  Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning , 1998 .

[31]  P. Frensch,et al.  Composition during serial learning: a serial position effect. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning , 2000 .

[33]  David A. Caulton,et al.  On the Modularity of Sequence Representation , 1995 .

[34]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning , 1997 .

[35]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Richard B Ivry,et al.  Concurrent learning of temporal and spatial sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.