Optimal 3-Coverage with Minimum Separation Requirements for Ubiquitous Computing Environments

Sensors have been increasingly used for many ubiquitous computing applications such as asset location monitoring, visual surveillance, and human motion tracking. In such applications, it is important to place sensors such that every point of the target area can be sensed by more than one sensor. Especially, many practical applications require 3-coverage for triangulation, 3D hull building, and etc. Also, in order to extract meaningful information from the data sensed by multiple sensors, those sensors need to be placed not too close to each other—minimum separation requirement. To address the 3-coverage problem with the minimum separation requirement, our recent work  (Kim et al. 2008) proposes two heuristic methods, so called, overlaying method and TRE-based method, which complement each other depending on the minimum separation requirement. For these two methods, we also provide mathematical analysis that can clearly guide us when to use the TRE-based method and when to use the overlaying method and also how many sensors are required. To make it self-contained, in this paper, we first revisit the two heuristic methods. Then, as an extension, we present an ILP-based optimal solution targeting for grid coverage. With this ILP-based optimal solution, we investigate how much close the two heuristic methods are to the optimal solution. Finally, this paper discusses the impacts of the proposed methods on real-deployed systems using two example sensor systems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that systematically addresses the 3-coverage problem with the minimum separation requirement.

[1]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  Efficient deployment algorithms for ensuring coverage and connectivity of wireless sensor networks , 2005, First International Conference on Wireless Internet (WICON'05).

[2]  Majid Bagheri,et al.  Randomized k-Coverage Algorithms For Dense Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[3]  Rong Zheng,et al.  Lightning: A Hard Real-Time, Fast, and Lightweight Low-End Wireless Sensor Election Protocol for Acoustic Event Localization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Mohammad Shikh-Bahaei,et al.  Multi-User Time-Frequency Downlink Scheduling and Resource Allocation for LTE Cellular Systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.

[5]  Chang-Gun Lee,et al.  Sensor Placement for 3-Coverage with Minimum Separation Requirements , 2008, DCOSS.

[6]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  The Coverage Problem in a Wireless Sensor Network , 2003, WSNA '03.

[7]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  An Incremental Self-Deployment Algorithm for Mobile Sensor Networks , 2002, Auton. Robots.

[8]  Francis Schmitt,et al.  Multi-stereo 3D object reconstruction , 2002, Proceedings. First International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission.

[9]  Jie Wu,et al.  Maximum network lifetime in wireless sensor networks with adjustable sensing ranges , 2005, WiMob'2005), IEEE International Conference on Wireless And Mobile Computing, Networking And Communications, 2005..

[10]  TsengYu-Chee,et al.  The coverage problem in a wireless sensor network , 2005 .

[11]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  A distributed self spreading algorithm for mobile wireless sensor networks , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[12]  Dong Xuan,et al.  On Deploying Wireless Sensors to Achieve Both Coverage and Connectivity , 2006, 2009 5th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[13]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  The coverage problem in three-dimensional wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004. GLOBECOM '04..

[14]  Himanshu Gupta,et al.  Connected K-coverage problem in sensor networks , 2004, Proceedings. 13th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04EX969).

[15]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Low-coordination topologies for redundancy in sensor networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[16]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[17]  Guoliang Xing,et al.  Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration in wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[18]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Grid Coverage for Surveillance and Target Location in Distributed Sensor Networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[19]  Chang-Gun Lee,et al.  Real-Time Indoor Human / Object Tracking for Inexpensive Technology-Based Assisted Living ∗ , 2006 .

[20]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[21]  Jie Wu,et al.  On Connected Multiple Point Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Networks.

[22]  Di Tian,et al.  A coverage-preserving node scheduling scheme for large wireless sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[23]  R. Kershner The Number of Circles Covering a Set , 1939 .

[24]  Man-Ki Yoon,et al.  A Real-Time Ubiquitous System for Assisted Living: Combined Scheduling of Sensing and Communication for Real-Time Tracking , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[25]  Mac Schwager,et al.  From Theory to Practice: Distributed Coverage Control Experiments with Groups of Robots , 2008, ISER.

[26]  Mac Schwager,et al.  Decentralized, Adaptive Control for Coverage with Networked Robots , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[27]  Krishnendu Chakrabarty,et al.  Sensor placement for effective coverage and surveillance in distributed sensor networks , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[28]  Sartaj Sahni,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for Sensor Deployment , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Computers.