Secondary-task effects on sequence learning

With a repeated sequence of stimuli, performance in a serial reaction-time task improves more than with a random sequence. The difference has been taken as a measure of implicit sequence learning. Implicit sequence learning is impaired when a secondary task is added to the serial RT task. In the first experiment, secondary-task effects on different types of sequences were studied to test the hypothesis that the learning of unique sequences (where each sequence element has a unique relation to the following one) is not impaired by the secondary task, while the learning of ambiguous sequences is. The sequences were random up to a certain order of sequential dependencies, where they became deterministic. Contrary to the hypothesis, secondary-task effects on the learning of unique sequences were as strong or stronger than such effects on the learning of ambiguous sequences. In the second experiment a hybrid sequence (with unique as well as ambiguous transitions) was used with different secondary tasks. A visuo-spatial and a verbal memory task did not interfere with the learning of the sequence, but interference was observed with an auditory go/no-go task in which high- and low-pitched tones were presented after each manual response and a foot pedal had to be pressed in response to high-pitched tones. Thus, interference seems to be specific to certain secondary tasks and may be related to memory processes (but most likely not to visuo-spatial and verbal memory) or to the organization of sequences, consistent with previous suggestions.

[1]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Some points of contact between models of central capacity and factor-analytic models , 1985 .

[2]  P. J. Jennings,et al.  Attention in the representation of sequence: Experiment and theory ☆ , 1992 .

[3]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[4]  D J Povel,et al.  Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[5]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  A Multiple-Representations’ Approach to Mental Practice of Motor Skills1 , 1989 .

[6]  M. A. Stadler,et al.  Role of attention in implicit learning. , 1995 .

[7]  D. Shanks.  IMPLICIT LEARNING AND TACIT KNOWLEDGE - AN ESSAY ON THE COGNITIVE UNCONSCIOUS - REBER,A , 1995 .

[8]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Mapping of Sequence Learning in Normal Humans , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[10]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[12]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Two modes of learning for interactive tasks , 1988, Cognition.

[13]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Working memory in the acquisition of complex cognitive skills , 1989 .

[14]  B. Kerr,et al.  Processing demands during mental operations , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[15]  J. Annett.  On Knowing How to Do Things , 1986 .

[16]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Interactive tasks and the implicit‐explicit distinction , 1988 .

[17]  Johannes Engelkamp.  Das menschliche Gedächtnis : das Erinnern von Sprache, Bildern und Handlungen , 1991 .

[18]  P. Frensch,et al.  Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. , 1994 .

[19]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[20]  J. Annett.  Motor imagery: Perception or action? , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  A. Reber.  The cognitive unconscious: An evolutionary perspective , 1992, Consciousness and Cognition.

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  D Broadbent,et al.  Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  L. Brooks.  The Suppression of Visualization by Reading , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  J C Hay,et al.  Motor-Transformation Learning , 1974, Perception.

[26]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[27]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. , 1992 .

[29]  Peter Bullemer,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989 .

[30]  Michael Ziessler,et al.  The programming of structural properties of movement sequences , 1988, Zeitschrift fur Psychologie mit Zeitschrift fur angewandte Psychologie.