The detail is in the difficulty: Challenging search facilitates rich incidental object encoding
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Torgerson. Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method , 1952 .
[2] R. Shepard. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .
[3] R. Haber,et al. Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli , 1970 .
[4] L. Standing. Learning 10000 pictures , 1973 .
[5] R. Nosofsky. Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. , 1984 .
[6] S. Shevell,et al. Developmental changes in face processing: results from multidimensional scaling. , 1985, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[7] R. Shepard,et al. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.
[8] J. Duncan,et al. Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.
[9] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10] T. Valentine. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .
[11] R. Nosofsky. Similarity Scaling and Cognitive Process Models , 1992 .
[12] J. Theeuwes. Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection , 1994, Perception.
[13] J. Theeuwes. Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[14] R. Goldstone. An efficient method for obtaining similarity data , 1994 .
[15] S. Goldinger. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.
[16] J. Henderson,et al. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2002 .
[17] A. Yonelinas. The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .
[18] A. Hollingworth. Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[19] Carrick C. Williams,et al. Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[20] J. Henderson,et al. Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes , 2005 .
[21] Jason L Hicks,et al. On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[22] R. Marsh,et al. Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions☆ , 2005 .
[23] James T. Enns,et al. Relax! Cognitive strategy influences visual search , 2006 .
[24] A. Hollingworth. Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search , 2006 .
[25] Jason L. Hicks,et al. Task interference from event-based intentions , 2006 .
[26] S. Vogt,et al. Long-term memory for 400 pictures on a common theme. , 2007, Experimental psychology.
[27] Kyle R. Cave,et al. Costs in Searching for Two Targets: Dividing Search Across Target Types Could Improve Airport Security Screening , 2007 .
[28] Aude Oliva,et al. Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] Nick Donnelly,et al. The cost of search for multiple targets: effects of practice and target similarity. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[30] G. Zelinsky,et al. Short article: Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[31] Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al. Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets , 2009, Vision Research.
[32] Carrick C. Williams. Incidental and intentional visual memory: What memories are and are not affected by encoding tasks? , 2010 .
[33] Timothy F. Brady,et al. Conceptual Distinctiveness Supports Detailed Visual Long-term Memory for Real-world Objects the Fidelity of Long-term Memory for Visual Information , 2022 .
[34] Stephen D. Goldinger,et al. A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces , 2010, Cognition.
[35] Timothy F. Brady,et al. Scene Memory Is More Detailed Than You Think : The Role of Categories in Visual Long-Term Memory , 2010 .
[36] Stephen D. Goldinger,et al. Learning in repeated visual search , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[37] Robert G Alexander,et al. Visual similarity effects in categorical search. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[38] Eli Brenner,et al. Speed judgments of three-dimensional motion incorporate extraretinal information. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[39] D. Levi,et al. Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[40] Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al. Effects of part-based similarity on visual search: The Frankenbear experiment , 2012, Vision Research.
[41] Michael C Hout,et al. Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] Scott A. Guerin,et al. Retrieval Failure Contributes to Gist-Based False Recognition. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.
[43] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .
[44] Timothy F. Brady,et al. Visual Long-Term Memory Has the Same Limit on Fidelity as Visual Working Memory , 2013, Psychological science.
[45] Michael C. Hout,et al. Multidimensional Scaling , 2003, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.
[46] Michael C. Hout,et al. The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[47] Timothy F. Brady,et al. Real-world objects are not represented as bound units: independent forgetting of different object details from visual memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[48] Mark D. Thomas,et al. The target effect: Visual memory for unnamed search targets , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[49] Michael C. Hout,et al. Visual similarity is stronger than semantic similarity in guiding visual search for numbers , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[50] Stephen D. Goldinger,et al. MM-MDS: A Multidimensional Scaling Database with Similarity Ratings for 240 Object Categories from the Massive Memory Picture Database , 2014, PloS one.
[51] J. Wolfe,et al. Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories. , 2014, Journal of vision.
[52] Grigori Yourganov,et al. The Perception of Naturalness Correlates with Low-Level Visual Features of Environmental Scenes , 2014, PloS one.
[53] H. Egeth,et al. Massive memory revisited: Limitations on storage capacity for object details in visual long-term memory , 2015, Learning & memory.
[54] Too easy? The influence of task demands conveyed tacitly on prospective memory , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[55] Phillip Wolff,et al. Causal reasoning with forces , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[56] Michael C Hout,et al. Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[57] S. Fleming,et al. Explicit representation of confidence informs future value-based decisions , 2016, Nature Human Behaviour.
[58] Michael C Hout,et al. The Novel Object and Unusual Name (NOUN) Database: A collection of novel images for use in experimental research , 2016, Behavior research methods.
[59] Dejan Draschkow,et al. Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects. , 2016, Acta psychologica.
[60] Tamaryn Menneer,et al. Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[61] Michael C. Hout,et al. SpAM is convenient but also satisfying: Reply to Verheyen et al. (2016). , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[62] J. Wolfe,et al. Five factors that guide attention in visual search , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.
[63] Task-relevant perceptual features can define categories in visual memory too , 2017, Memory & cognition.
[64] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[65] R. Luria,et al. Different features of real-world objects are represented in a dependent manner in long-term memory. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[66] Dejan Draschkow,et al. The lower bounds of massive memory: Investigating memory for object details after incidental encoding , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[67] Megan H. Papesh,et al. Incidental memory following rapid object processing: The role of attention allocation strategies. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[68] Michael C. Hout,et al. Examining the effects of passive and active strategies on behavior during hybrid visual memory search: evidence from eye tracking , 2019, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.
[69] Marc G. Berman,et al. Psychological responses to natural patterns in architecture , 2019, Journal of Environmental Psychology.
[70] Samuel M. McClure,et al. Learning concepts when instances never repeat , 2018, Memory & cognition.
[71] Timothy F. Brady,et al. Independent storage of different features of real-world objects in long-term memory. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. General.