Topographic organization of nerve field with teacher signal

Abstract A number of neurons which respond selectively to specific stimuli are observed in many parts of the vertebrate nervous system. These neurons are developed by self-organization through sensory experiences. This is regarded as a mechanism for representing the external world structure. However, it is insufficient to think only of this learning mechanism being dependent on the input environment; other information representing mechanisms should exist in the brain. The present article proposes a neural learning model which reflects not only the input signal set but also the teacher signal. This model is constructed by adding a teacher signal layer to the conventional models for topographic organization. After learning, the network realizes the desired input-output relation. Moreover, a structure is organized in the network, not only so as to represent the input environment structure but also to fit well in the “system purpose.” The model behavior was investigated through computer simulations, and the formation of spatial maps in the brain is discussed from a viewpoint of purpose dependent representation.

[1]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Field theory of self-organizing neural nets , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  S. Kaplan The Physiology of Thought , 1950 .

[3]  Shun-Ichi Amari,et al.  Topographic organization of nerve fields , 1979, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  A. A. Mullin,et al.  Principles of neurodynamics , 1962 .

[5]  D L Sparks,et al.  Translation of sensory signals into commands for control of saccadic eye movements: role of primate superior colliculus. , 1986, Physiological reviews.

[6]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  Development of the Brain depends on the Visual Environment , 1970, Nature.

[7]  D. Robinson Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. , 1972, Vision research.

[8]  C. Malsburg,et al.  How patterned neural connections can be set up by self-organization , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  David L. Sparks,et al.  Auditory receptive fields in primate superior colliculus shift with changes in eye position , 1984, Nature.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[12]  P. K. Rose,et al.  The spinal course and distribution of fore and hind limb muscle afferent projections to the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  B E Stein,et al.  Relationship between visual and tactile representations in cat superior colliculus. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .