Avoiding moving obstacles

To successfully move our hand to a target, we must consider how to get there without hitting surrounding objects. In a dynamic environment this involves being able to respond quickly when our relationship with surrounding objects changes. People adjust their hand movements with a latency of about 120 ms when the visually perceived position of their hand or of the target suddenly changes. It is not known whether people can react as quickly when the position of an obstacle changes. Here we show that quick responses of the hand to changes in obstacle position are possible, but that these responses are direct reactions to the motion in the surrounding. True adjustments to the changed position of the obstacle appeared at much longer latencies (about 200 ms). This is even so when the possible change is predictable. Apparently, our brain uses certain information exceptionally quickly for guiding our movements, at the expense of not always responding adequately. For reaching a target that changes position, one must at some time move in the same direction as the target did. For avoiding obstacles that change position, moving in the same direction as the obstacle is not always an adequate response, not only because it may be easier to avoid the obstacle by moving the other way, but also because one wants to hit the target after passing the obstacle. Perhaps subjects nevertheless quickly respond in the direction of motion because this helps avoid collisions when pressed for time.

[1]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast corrections of movements with a computer mouse. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[3]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Large-Field Visual Motion Directly Induces an Involuntary Rapid Manual Following Response , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Ivry,et al.  Independent on‐line control of the two hands during bimanual reaching , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  S. Jackson,et al.  Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  J. Pratt,et al.  Action-centered inhibition: Effects of distractors on movement planning and execution , 1994 .

[8]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 1991, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  S. Tipper,et al.  Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects. , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[11]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Conditions determining early modification of motor programmes in response to changes in target location , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Desmurget,et al.  An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance and a Perturbation Sensitivity Model for Motor Planning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Tipper,et al.  Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Jeroen B. J. Smeets,et al.  Visuomotor delays when hitting running spiders. , 1998 .

[17]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Flexibility in intercepting moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[18]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object , 2003, Nature.

[19]  Uta Sailer,et al.  Implications of distracter effects for the organization of eye movements, hand movements, and perception. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Brenner,et al.  The influence of obstacles on the speed of grasping , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Reach-to-grasp movements during obstacle avoidance , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  V Nougier,et al.  Control of goal-directed movements: the contribution of orienting of visual attention and motor preparation. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[25]  James R Tresilian,et al.  Selective attention in reaching: when is an object not a distractor? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Masud Husain,et al.  Visual control of hand action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  The effect of obstacle position on reach-to-grasp movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  J. Findlay Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[30]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[31]  Uta Sailer,et al.  Global effect of a nearby distractor on targeting eye and hand movements. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[33]  B. Day,et al.  Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  E. Brenner,et al.  Perceptual requirements for fast manual responses , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  G L Almeida,et al.  Effects of direction and curvature on variable error pattern of reaching movements. , 1999, Motor control.

[37]  U. Castiello Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  J. Tresilian Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Control of human arm movements in two dimensions: paths and joint control in avoiding simple linear obstacles , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  V Weerdesteyn,et al.  Gait adjustments in response to an obstacle are faster than voluntary reactions. , 2004, Human movement science.

[41]  J. Saunders,et al.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Eli Brenner,et al.  The latency for correcting a movement depends on the visual attribute that defines the target , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Interference from Distractors in Reach-to-grasp Movements , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[44]  U. Castiello Grasping a fruit: selection for action. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Visual distractors differentially interfere with the reaching and grasping components of prehension movements , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Romeo Chua,et al.  The Influence of Target Perturbation on Manual Aiming Asymmetries in Right-Handers , 1995, Cortex.