Ethics-focused dynamic capabilities: a small business perspective

Our analysis of survey data of US small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) explores (1) whether firms have ‘dynamic’ capabilities that change their ethics-focused operational capabilities; (2) what effects those dynamic capabilities have on both ethical and competitive performance; and, (3) whether those effects are contingent on a firm’s entrepreneurial characteristics. Our survey reveals that about a quarter of SMEs self-report high levels of these ethics-focused dynamic capabilities. We use hierarchical OLS to analyze the survey data to find that the general effect of these capabilities is positive on an SME’s ethical performance, and that the performance effects are contingent on an SME’s degree of entrepreneurial orientation and sensitivity to changes in the business context. The main implication is that the extent of heterogeneity in types, roles, and performance effects of ‘higher-than-operations-level’ capabilities is likely underestimated in current dynamic capabilities theory and application.

[1]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  The Red Queen, Success Bias, and Organizational Inertia , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy , 2003 .

[3]  John W. Jones,et al.  Psychological correlates of business ethics orientation in executives , 1993 .

[4]  D. Avram,et al.  Implementing Responsible Business Behavior from a Strategic Management Perspective: Developing a Framework for Austrian SMEs , 2008 .

[5]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[6]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[7]  W. Dennis,et al.  Raising Response Rates in Mail Surveys of Small Business Owners: Results of an Experiment , 2003 .

[8]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[9]  R. Arvey,et al.  Rule breaking in adolescence and entrepreneurial status: An empirical investigation , 2009 .

[10]  Ted Fuller,et al.  Social and Symbolic Capital and Responsible Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Investigation of SME Narratives , 2006 .

[11]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[12]  B. Menguc,et al.  Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness , 2006 .

[13]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[14]  Steven H. Seggie,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities View: Foundations and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[15]  Francis T. Hannafey.  Entrepreneurship and Ethics: A Literature Review , 2003 .

[16]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[17]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Capabilities in Motion: New Organizational Forms and the Reshaping of the Hollywood Movie Industry , 2003 .

[18]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[19]  Jason Stansbury.  Reasoned Moral Agreement: Applying Discourse Ethics within Organizations , 2009, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[20]  Bruce A. Kirchhoff,et al.  Looking beyond resources: Exploring the importance of entrepreneurship to firm-level competitive advantage in technologically intensive industries , 2008 .

[21]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: FURTHER EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[22]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[23]  David A. Griffith,et al.  An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance , 2007 .

[24]  J. Barney.  Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[25]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[26]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality , 1991 .

[27]  Lei-Yu Wu,et al.  Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's high-tech firms , 2007 .

[28]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[29]  D. Jamali,et al.  Peculiar Strengths and Relational Attributes of SMEs in the Context of CSR , 2009 .

[30]  J. Hulland,et al.  Redeployment of Brands, Sales Forces, and General Marketing Management Expertise following Horizontal Acquisitions: A Resource-Based View , 1999 .

[31]  Donald O. Neubaum,et al.  Firm Newness, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Ethical Climate , 2004 .

[32]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[33]  Anne Barraquier.  Ethical Behaviour in Practice: Decision Outcomes and Strategic Implications , 2011 .

[34]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Technology-Based New Product Development Partnerships , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[35]  Y. Fassin.  The Reasons Behind Non-Ethical Behaviour in Business and Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[36]  Philip Bromiley,et al.  Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: spare change, everyone? , 2009 .

[37]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle , 2001 .

[38]  S. Maxfield,et al.  Reconciling Corporate Citizenship and Competitive Strategy: Insights from Economic Theory , 2008 .

[39]  Pamela L. Alreck,et al.  The Survey Research Handbook , 1984 .

[40]  O. Fisscher,et al.  Stretching the Frontiers: Exploring the Relationships Between Entrepreneurship and Ethics , 2005 .

[41]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives' decisions , 2005 .

[42]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[43]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[44]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Competitive Analysis and New Venture Performance: Understanding the Impact of Strategic Uncertainty and Venture Origin* , 2002 .

[45]  David Hess,et al.  The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives , 2002 .

[46]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Capability Reconfiguration: An Analysis of Incumbent Responses to Technological Change , 2006 .

[47]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[48]  D. Payne,et al.  Successful U.S. Entrepreneurs: Identifying Ethical Decision-making and Social Responsibility Behaviors , 2006 .

[49]  Daulatram B. Lund,et al.  The influence of personal and organizational values on marketing professionals' ethical behavior , 1994 .

[50]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[51]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[52]  K. Weick.  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[53]  S. Dutta,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in High-Technology Markets: The Competitive Advantage of the Haves , 2006 .

[54]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[55]  H. Jenkins.  Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[56]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  Corporate Ethics Programs as Control Systems: Influences of Executive Commitment and Environmental Factors , 1999 .

[57]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[58]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[59]  M. Porter,et al.  Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[60]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[61]  T. Jones,et al.  An Agent Morality View of Business Policy , 1995 .

[62]  Bart Victor,et al.  The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates , 1988 .

[63]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance , 2003 .

[64]  Alessandro Sterlacchini,et al.  Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms , 1990 .

[65]  Peter J. Sher,et al.  Information Technology as a Facilitator of Enhancing Dynamic Capability through Knowledge Management , 2020 .

[66]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach , 2005 .

[67]  Donald P. Robin,et al.  The Ethical Decision Making Process of Small Business Owner/managers and Their Customers , 1993 .

[68]  Lei-Yu Wu,et al.  Resources, dynamic capabilities and performance in a dynamic environment: Perceptions in Taiwanese IT enterprises , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[69]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  The Electronic Survey Technique: An Integration and Assessment , 2000 .

[70]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[71]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[72]  N. Noorderhaven,et al.  When Does Trust Matter to Alliance Performance , 2006 .

[73]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. , 1977 .

[74]  Donald O. Neubaum,et al.  A Typology of Social Entrepreneurs: Motives, search Processes and Ethical Challenges , 2009 .

[75]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[76]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[77]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities , 2003 .

[78]  L. Treviño.  Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model , 1986 .

[79]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  A General Dynamic Capability: Does it Propagate Business and Social Competencies in the Retail Food Industry?* , 2006 .

[80]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size , 1987 .

[81]  N. Cornelius,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and the Social Enterprise , 2008 .

[82]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  On the Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches , 2015 .

[83]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[84]  R. Cardy,et al.  Assessing ethical behavior: the impact of outcomes on judgment bias , 2006 .

[85]  Bruce H. Clark.  Managerial perceptions of marketing performance: efficiency, adaptability, effectiveness and satisfaction , 2000 .

[86]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[87]  C. W. Moore,et al.  Ethical Attitudes in Small Businesses and Large Corporations: Theory and Empirical Findings from a Tracking Study Spanning Three Decades , 2006 .

[88]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[89]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[90]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[91]  D. Williamson,et al.  Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR , 2006 .

[92]  Scott L. Newbert.  New Firm Formation: A Dynamic Capability Perspective , 2005 .

[93]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[94]  Daphne W. Yiu,et al.  Corporate Entrepreneurship as Resource Capital Configuration in Emerging Market Firms , 2007 .

[95]  Diana C. Robertson,et al.  Lying: The Impact of Decision Context , 2000 .

[96]  F. Perrini.  SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective , 2006 .

[97]  R. Newby,et al.  SME Survey Methodology: Response Rates, Data Quality, and Cost Effectiveness , 2003 .