Meta-analytic connectivity modeling revisited: Controlling for activation base rates

Co-activation of distinct brain regions is a measure of functional interaction, or connectivity, between those regions. The co-activation pattern of a given region can be investigated using seed-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data stored in databases such as BrainMap. This method reveals inter-regional functional connectivity by determining brain regions that are consistently co-activated with a given region of interest (the "seed") across a broad range of experiments. In current implementations of this meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM), significant spatial convergence (i.e. consistent co-activation) is distinguished from noise by comparing it against an unbiased null-distribution of random spatial associations between experiments according to which all gray-matter voxels have the same chance of convergence. As the a priori probability of finding activation in different voxels markedly differs across the brain, computing such a quasi-rectangular null-distribution renders the detection of significant convergence more likely in those voxels that are frequently activated. Here, we propose and test a modified MACM approach that takes this activation frequency bias into account. In this new specific co-activation likelihood estimation (SCALE) algorithm, a null-distribution is generated that reflects the base rate of reporting activation in any given voxel and thus equalizes the a priori chance of finding across-study convergence in each voxel of the brain. Using four exemplary seed regions (right visual area V4, left anterior insula, right intraparietal sulcus, and subgenual cingulum), our tests corroborated the enhanced specificity of the modified algorithm, indicating that SCALE may be especially useful for delineating distinct core networks of co-activation.

[1]  Martín Cammarota,et al.  A link between the hippocampal and the striatal memory systems of the brain. , 2006, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[2]  K. Zilles,et al.  A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[3]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Characterization of the temporo-parietal junction by combining data-driven parcellation, complementary connectivity analyses, and functional decoding , 2013, NeuroImage.

[5]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[7]  T. Kellermann,et al.  Modality-specific perceptual expectations selectively modulate baseline activity in auditory, somatosensory, and visual cortices. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Flavio Dell'Acqua,et al.  Structural human brain networks: hot topics in diffusion tractography. , 2012, Current opinion in neurology.

[9]  P. Fox,et al.  Segregation of the human medial prefrontal cortex in social cognition , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intention, Action Planning, and Decision Making in Parietal-Frontal Circuits , 2009, Neuron.

[11]  S. Petersen,et al.  A dual-networks architecture of top-down control , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Minimizing within‐experiment and within‐group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta‐analyses , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[13]  P. Fox,et al.  Dysregulated left inferior parietal activity in schizophrenia and depression: functional connectivity and characterization , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  G. Fink,et al.  REVIEW: The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in humans and monkeys , 2005, Journal of anatomy.

[15]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Is There “One” DLPFC in Cognitive Action Control? Evidence for Heterogeneity From Co-Activation-Based Parcellation , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Peter Janssen,et al.  The functional organization of the intraparietal sulcus in the macaque monkey , 2016 .

[18]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Visual Area V4 , 2012, Neuron.

[19]  K. Zilles,et al.  Coordinate‐based activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data: A random‐effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[20]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  K. Zilles,et al.  Differentiated parietal connectivity of frontal regions for “what” and “where” memory , 2012, Brain Structure and Function.

[23]  Danilo Bzdok,et al.  The modular neuroarchitecture of social judgments on faces. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Dissociating bottom-up and top-down processes in a manual stimulus-response compatibility task. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  P. Fox,et al.  Introspective Minds: Using ALE Meta-Analyses to Study Commonalities in the Neural Correlates of Emotional Processing, Social & Unconstrained Cognition , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Organizational principles of human visual cortex revealed by receptor mapping. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  K. Amunts,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.

[29]  Walter Schneider,et al.  The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  K. Amunts,et al.  Probabilistic maps, morphometry, and variability of cytoarchitectonic areas in the human superior parietal cortex. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Broca's region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets , 2006, Neuron.

[34]  P. Fox,et al.  Metaanalytic connectivity modeling: Delineating the functional connectivity of the human amygdala , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Modelling neural correlates of working memory: A coordinate-based meta-analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[37]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Definition and characterization of an extended social-affective default network , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[40]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Ventral visual cortex in humans: Cytoarchitectonic mapping of two extrastriate areas , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[42]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Investigating function and connectivity of morphometric findings — Exemplified on cerebellar atrophy in spinocerebellar ataxia 17 (SCA17) , 2012, NeuroImage.

[43]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Across-study and within-subject functional connectivity of a right temporo-parietal junction subregion involved in stimulus–context integration , 2012, NeuroImage.

[44]  Danilo Bzdok,et al.  The BrainMap strategy for standardization, sharing, and meta-analysis of neuroimaging data , 2011, BMC Research Notes.

[45]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Investigating the Functional Heterogeneity of the Default Mode Network Using Coordinate-Based Meta-Analytic Modeling , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Cytoarchitectonical analysis and probabilistic mapping of two extrastriate areas of the human posterior fusiform gyrus , 2012, Brain Structure and Function.

[47]  P. Fox,et al.  Bridging the gap between functional and anatomical features of cortico‐cerebellar circuits using meta‐analytic connectivity modeling , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[48]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Aging and response conflict solution: behavioural and functional connectivity changes , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[50]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Adult age-dependent differences in resting-state connectivity within and between visual-attention and sensorimotor networks , 2013, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[51]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Tackling the multifunctional nature of Broca's region meta-analytically: Co-activation-based parcellation of area 44 , 2013, NeuroImage.

[52]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article , 2022 .

[53]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Cytoarchitecture, probability maps and functions of the human frontal pole , 2014, NeuroImage.

[54]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Networks of task co-activations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[55]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic identification and probabilistic mapping of two distinct areas within the anterior ventral bank of the human intraparietal sulcus , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[57]  Qingyang Li,et al.  Emotional perception: Meta-analyses of face and natural scene processing , 2011, NeuroImage.

[58]  Eric Guedj,et al.  EPA-0789 – Dissociating Bottom-Up and Top-Down Mechanisms in the Cortico-Limbic System During Emotion Processing , 2014, European Psychiatry.

[59]  P. Fox,et al.  The role of anterior midcingulate cortex in cognitive motor control , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[60]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Co-activation patterns distinguish cortical modules, their connectivity and functional differentiation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[61]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[62]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Anatomical and Functional Connectivity of Cytoarchitectonic Areas within the Human Parietal Operculum , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  S. Eickhoff,et al.  Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Translating working memory into action: Behavioral and neural evidence for using motor representations in encoding visuo‐spatial sequences , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[65]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Receptor architecture of human cingulate cortex: Evaluation of the four‐region neurobiological model , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[66]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Task- and resting-state functional connectivity of brain regions related to affection and susceptible to concurrent cognitive demand , 2013, NeuroImage.

[67]  S. Eickhoff,et al.  Approaches for the Integrated Analysis of Structure, Function and Connectivity of the Human Brain , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.