The good, the bad and the discriminator--errors in direct and indirect reciprocity.

This paper presents, in a series of simple diagrams, concise results about the replicator dynamics of direct and indirect reciprocity. We consider repeated interactions between donors and recipients, and analyse the relationship between three basic strategies for the donor: unconditional cooperation, all-out defection, and conditional cooperation. In other words, we investigate the competition of discriminating and indiscriminating altruists with defectors. Discriminators and defectors form a bistable community, and hence a population of discriminators cannot be invaded by defectors. But unconditional altruists can invade a discriminating population and 'soften it up' for a subsequent invasion by defectors. The resulting dynamics exhibits various forms of rock-paper-scissors cycles and depends in subtle ways on noise, in the form of errors in implementation. The probability for another round (in the case of direct reciprocity), and information about the co-player (in the case of indirect reciprocity), add further elements to the ecology of reciprocation.

[1]  M. Dufwenberg,et al.  Direct versus indirect reciprocity : An experiment , 2001 .

[2]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey systems: an ecological perspective , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[3]  Glenn Ellison Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma with Anonymous Random Matching , 1994 .

[4]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  Complex Adaptive Systems and the Evolution of Reciprocation , 1998, Ecosystems.

[5]  M. Nowak,et al.  Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. , 2000, Science.

[6]  Géza Meszéna,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics in a 2-patch Environment: a Simple Model for Allopatric and Parapatric Speciation , 1997 .

[7]  M A Nowak,et al.  The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  M. Nowak,et al.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1993, Nature.

[9]  M. Nowak,et al.  The evolution of stochastic strategies in the Prisoner's Dilemma , 1990 .

[10]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[11]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  Indirect reciprocity, image scoring, and moral hazard. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[13]  Marcus Frean The prisoner’s dilemma without synchrony , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans. , 2000, Science.

[15]  U Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary Cycling of Predator-Prey Interactions : Population Dynamics and the Red Queen , 1999 .

[16]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[17]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[18]  T. Dooren,et al.  THE EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF DIRECT PHENOTYPIC OVERDOMINANCE: EMERGENCE POSSIBLE, LOSS PROBABLE , 2000 .

[19]  Oscar De Feo,et al.  Bifurcations Analysis of Population invasion: on-Off intermittency and Basin Riddling , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[20]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .

[22]  C. Hauert,et al.  Reward and punishment , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[24]  博 太郎丸 <書評> Robert Sugden, "The economics of rights, co-operation and welfare", Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1986 , 1992 .

[25]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[26]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[27]  M A Nowak,et al.  The logic of contrition. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Robert W. Rosenthal,et al.  Sequences of Games with Varying Opponents , 1979 .

[29]  Arnon Lotem,et al.  Evolution of cooperation between individuals , 1999, Nature.

[30]  Mikko Heino,et al.  Management of evolving fish stocks , 1998 .

[31]  R. Boyd,et al.  Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem , 2004, Nature.

[32]  R. Evans The company of strangers. , 1991, Nursing the elderly : in hospital, homes and the community.

[33]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[34]  Marino Gatto,et al.  Lyapunov exponents and the mathematics of invasion in oscillatory or chaotic populations , 1995 .

[35]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Reciprocity and the emergence of reputation , 1992 .

[36]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  J. Metz,et al.  The enigma of frequency-dependent selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  M Gyllenberg,et al.  Evolution of dispersal in metapopulations with local density dependence and demographic stochasticity , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[39]  Peter Hammerstein,et al.  Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation , 2003 .

[40]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  On evolution under asymmetric competition , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[41]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  How should we define goodness?--reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  Richard E. Michod,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatially Heterogeneous Populations , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[43]  I. Hanski,et al.  Evolution of Migration Rate in a Spatially Realistic Metapopulation Model , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Michael A Fishman,et al.  Indirect reciprocity among imperfect individuals. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  M. Nowak,et al.  The Alternating Prisoner's Dilemma , 1994 .

[46]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[47]  R. Boyd,et al.  Explaining altruistic behavior in humans , 2003 .

[48]  Games, sex, and evolution , 1988 .

[49]  L. Dugatkin Cooperation Among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1997 .

[50]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Evolutionary cycles of cooperation and defection. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of dispersal , 1999 .

[52]  R. D. Alexander The biology of moral systems , 1989 .

[53]  Dirk Semmann,et al.  Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Zbigniew Nitecki,et al.  Global Theory of Dynamical Systems , 1980 .

[55]  Michihiro Kandori Social Norms and Community Enforcement , 1992 .

[56]  R. Selten,et al.  Gaps in Harley's argument on evolutionarily stable learning rules and in the logic of “tit for tat” , 1984, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[57]  Karthik Panchanathan,et al.  A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  The Long-Term Benefits of Human Generosity in Indirect Reciprocity , 2002, Current Biology.

[59]  E. C. Zeeman,et al.  Population dynamics from game theory , 1980 .

[60]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  The logic of reprobation: assessment and action rules for indirect reciprocation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[61]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[62]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[63]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Evolution and Cooperation in Noisy Repeated Games , 1990 .

[64]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  Game theory and the evolution of behaviour , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.