Exploring the neural correlates of goal-directed action and intention understanding

Because we are a cooperative species, understanding the goals and intentions of others is critical for human survival. In this fMRI study, participants viewed reaching behaviors in which one of four animated characters moved a hand towards one of two objects and either (a) picked up the object, (b) missed the object, or (c) changed his path halfway to lift the other object. The characters included a human, a humanoid robot, stacked boxes with an arm, and a mechanical claw. The first three moved in an identical, human-like biological pattern. Right posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) activity increased when the human or humanoid robot shifted goals or missed the target relative to obtaining the original goal. This suggests that the pSTS was engaged differentially for figures that appeared more human-like rather than for all human-like motion. Medial frontal areas that are part of a protagonist-monitoring network with the right pSTS (e.g., Mason and Just, 2006) were most engaged for the human character, followed by the robot character. The current data suggest that goal-directed action and intention understanding require this network and it is used similarly for the two processes. Moreover, it is modulated by character identity rather than only the presence of biological motion. We discuss the implications for behavioral theories of goal-directed action and intention understanding.

[1]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  The Role of the Theory-of-Mind Cortical Network in the Comprehension of Narratives , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[2]  Xiaosi Gu,et al.  Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  M. Sullivan THE A-THEORY: A THEORY , 2011 .

[5]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Watching cartoons activates the medial prefrontal cortex in children , 2007 .

[6]  D Yves von Cramon,et al.  Motion Class Dependency in Observers' Motor Areas Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Action Understanding in the Superior Temporal Sulcus Region , 2009, Psychological science.

[8]  Kazuo Hiraki,et al.  Infant's brain responses to live and televised action , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  B. Bower A Child's Theory of Mind , 1993 .

[10]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al.  EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[12]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Dissociable Medial Prefrontal Contributions to Judgments of Similar and Dissimilar Others , 2006, Neuron.

[13]  M. Just,et al.  Neuroimaging Contributions to the Understanding of Discourse Processes , 2006 .

[14]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain Activity Evoked by the Perception of Human Walking: Controlling for Meaningful Coherent Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  M. Santello,et al.  Effects of end-goal on hand shaping. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. D'Andrade A folk model of the mind , 1987 .

[18]  György Gergely,et al.  One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Livia Colle,et al.  The neural basis for understanding non-intended actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  K. Pelphrey,et al.  School-aged children exhibit domain-specific responses to biological motion , 2006, Social neuroscience.

[22]  Ruth Feldman,et al.  Maternal perception of infant intentionality at 4 and 8 months , 1996 .

[23]  Raymond H. Cuijpers,et al.  The role of inferior frontal and parietal areas in differentiating meaningful and meaningless object-directed actions , 2010, Brain Research.

[24]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Stephen P. Stich,et al.  Folk Psychology: Simulation or Tacit Theory? , 1992 .

[26]  U. Castiello,et al.  Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach-to-grasp movement , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  Jean Decety,et al.  Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency , 2002, Neuroreport.

[28]  Alan M. Leslie,et al.  How to acquire a ‘representational theory of mind’ , 1999 .

[29]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[30]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[31]  N. A. Borghese,et al.  Different Brain Correlates for Watching Real and Virtual Hand Actions , 2001, NeuroImage.

[32]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[34]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[35]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[37]  G. Csibra,et al.  The teleological origins of mentalistic action explanations: A developmental hypothesis , 1998 .

[38]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[40]  G. Csibra,et al.  'Obsessed with goals': functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[41]  G. Csibra,et al.  Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naı̈ve theory of rational action , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  D. Holland,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: An appraisal , 1987 .

[43]  A. Woodward Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach , 1998, Cognition.

[44]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[46]  K. Pelphrey,et al.  Charting the typical and atypical development of the social brain , 2008, Development and Psychopathology.

[47]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Involved in the Recognition of Actions Performed by Nonconspecifics: An fMRI Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[51]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. , 2007, Human movement science.

[53]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[54]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[55]  T. Heatherton,et al.  Detecting agency from the biological motion of veridical vs animated agents. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[56]  C. Keysers,et al.  Empathy and the Somatotopic Auditory Mirror System in Humans , 2006, Current Biology.

[57]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Distinct neural substrates for the perception of real and virtual visual worlds , 2005, NeuroImage.

[58]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[59]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[60]  Josef Perner,et al.  Understanding the mind as an active information processor: Do young children have a “copy theory of mind”? , 1991, Cognition.

[61]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Words, thoughts, and theories , 1997 .

[62]  Kevin A. Pelphrey,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  U. Castiello,et al.  The Human Premotor Cortex Is 'Mirror' Only for Biological Actions , 2004, Current Biology.

[64]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  A PET Exploration of the Neural Mechanisms Involved in Reciprocal Imitation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[65]  Kimberly J. Montgomery,et al.  Communicative hand gestures and object-directed hand movements activated the mirror neuron system. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[66]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[67]  Luca Turella,et al.  When Gaze Turns into Grasp , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.