The perceived contrast of texture patches embedded in natural images

The visibility of an isolated simple stimulus is known to depend on its contrast. However, when such a stimulus is surrounded by other geometrically-simple stimuli, its perceived contrast can change markedly. Here, we examined whether such effects contribute to our perception of contrasts when we view real world scenes. We show that the perceived contrast of a luminance texture patch is suppressed when it is surrounded by images of real world scenes. We also show that the amount of this suppression depends on the spatial statistics of the surrounding images. We manipulated the second-order statistics of the images and found minimal suppression of perceived contrast at "un-natural" image statistics and maximal suppression at the characteristic statistics of natural images. This suggests that contrast gain control mechanisms in our visual system are optimally engaged when we view real world images.

[1]  D J Tolhurst,et al.  Contrast constancy in natural scenes in shadow or direct light: A proposed role for contrast-normalisation (non-specific suppression) in visual cortex , 2005, Network.

[2]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Discrimination of changes in the second-order statistics of natural and synthetic images , 1994, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Amplitude spectra of natural images , 1992 .

[4]  Js McDonald.  Second order statistics affects perceived contrast in texture interactions , 2000 .

[5]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations , 1991, Vision Research.

[6]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  R. Snowden,et al.  The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination , 1998, Vision Research.

[8]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Comparing Contrast-Modulated and Luminance-Modulated Masking: Effects of Spatial Frequency and Phase , 2000, Perception.

[9]  H R Wilson,et al.  Apparent contrast and spatial frequency of local texture elements. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Js McDonald.  Centre - surround contrast interactions of textures depend on image statistics , 2000 .

[11]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Modelling the Power Spectra of Natural Images: Statistics and Information , 1996, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Coding of the contrasts in natural images by populations of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) , 2003, Vision Research.

[13]  M. B. Mandler,et al.  Mechanisms of simultaneous color induction. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. , 1987, Applied optics.

[15]  Paul Schrater,et al.  BOLD fMRI and psychophysical measurements of contrast response to broadband images , 2004, Vision Research.

[16]  D. Heeger,et al.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  M. Webster,et al.  Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  S. Laughlin.  A Simple Coding Procedure Enhances a Neuron's Information Capacity , 1981, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences.

[19]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998 .

[20]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[21]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[22]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Characterizing the sparseness of neural codes , 2001, Network.

[23]  D J Field,et al.  Local Contrast in Natural Images: Normalisation and Coding Efficiency , 2000, Perception.

[24]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  The human visual system is optimised for processing the spatial information in natural visual images , 2000, Current Biology.

[25]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Calculating the contrasts that retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurones encounter in natural scenes , 2000, Vision Research.

[26]  D. Field,et al.  Human discrimination of fractal images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex , 1982, Nature.

[28]  Yoshimichi Ejima,et al.  Apparent contrast of a sinusoidal grating in the simultaneous presence of peripheral gratings , 1985, Vision Research.

[29]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[30]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulation of the Nonclassical Receptive Field Increases Information Transmission Efficiency in V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  D. Heeger.  Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  P. Lennie.  The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[33]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs, and experimental validation , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[34]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Heeger,et al.  Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[36]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Individual differences in enhancement and suppression effects , 1993, Vision Research.

[38]  R C Reid,et al.  Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  Lynn A Olzak,et al.  Multiple gain control processes in contrast–contrast phenomena , 1999, Vision Research.

[41]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Discrimination of Spectrally Blended Natural Images: Optimisation of the Human Visual System for Encoding Natural Images , 2000, Perception.

[42]  David J Tolhurst,et al.  Coding of the contrasts in natural images by visual cortex (V1) neurons: a Bayesian approach. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.