Total cost of ownership, social lifecycle cost and energy consumption of various automotive technologies in Italy

This paper estimates the total cost of ownership, social lifecycle cost and energy consumption of 66 cars with different fuel/powertrains available in Italy in 2013. The aim is to provide the various private and public decision makers with information that could allow them to better understand the current market penetration of the various automotive technologies and to predict the future one. It is found that the car operated by conventional fuels (gasoline, diesel) is currently the least expensive as far as the total costs of ownership are concerned. The bi-fuel liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and the bi-fuel compressed natural gas (CNG) internal combustion engine vehicles are in the same price range. Both the battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and, especially, the hybrid ICEVs are more expensive. On the contrary, the social lifecycle costs of the BEVs are the lowest, thanks not only to their zero air pollutants' emissions in the use phase but also to their reduced noise emissions. The amount of the social costs relative to the total cost of ownership, estimated using recent European parameters, represents at the most 6% of the total cost. Consequently, even if the external costs were internalized, the alternative fuel vehicles would not become convenient for the final consumer from a monetary point of view. Considering the energy consumption, with the 2011 Italian energy production mix, the BEVs and the diesel hybrid are the most energy efficient cars. Focusing on 7 specific models, and simulating realistic scenarios, it is found that the relative ranking of the BEVs in terms of total costs improves moderately when the traveled distance increases, subsidies are introduced and battery price drops. However, the BEVs become convenient only when the annual distance traveled is at least 20,000 km, a value much higher than the current Italian average and posing serious issues in terms of vehicles' range. Only a joint reduction of the battery price to €240/kWh from initial estimated cost of €412/kWh and the introduction of a subsidy would make the BEVs competitive with the current average Italian annual distance traveled.

[1]  Alexandre Lucas,et al.  Life cycle analysis of energy supply infrastructure for conventional and electric vehicles , 2012 .

[2]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Total cost of ownership, payback, and consumer preference modeling of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2013 .

[3]  Massimo Santarelli,et al.  Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different powertrain/fuel options using well-to-wheels assessment, energy and external costs – European market analysis , 2010 .

[4]  Julian D Marshall,et al.  Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Patrícia Baptista,et al.  Full life cycle analysis of market penetration of electricity based vehicles , 2009 .

[6]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  A sustainability assessment of electric vehicles as a personal mobility system , 2012 .

[7]  M. Zackrisson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles – Critical issues , 2010 .

[8]  Ye Wu,et al.  Total versus urban: Well-to-wheels assessment of criteria pollutant emissions from various vehicle/fuel systems , 2009 .

[9]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[10]  R. Friedrich,et al.  External Costs of Transport in Europe , 2011 .

[11]  Jian Liu,et al.  Decarbonizing the Road Transport Sector: Break-even Point and Consequent Potential Consumers' Behavior for the U.S. Case , 2015 .

[12]  Ola Maurstad,et al.  Well-to-wheel study of passenger vehicles in the Norwegian energy system , 2007 .

[13]  Qinhu Chai,et al.  Well-to-wheels life-cycle analysis of alternative fuels and vehicle technologies in China , 2012 .

[14]  F Hacker,et al.  Environmental impacts and impact on the electricity market of a large scale introduction of electric cars in Europe: critical review of literature , 2009 .

[15]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Comparing resale prices and total cost of ownership for gasoline, hybrid and diesel passenger cars and trucks , 2013 .

[16]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity of Marginal Emissions: Implications for Electric Cars and Other Electricity-Shifting Policies , 2012 .

[19]  Romeo Danielis,et al.  The private and social monetary costs and the energy consumption of a car. An estimate for seven cars with different vehicle technologies on sale in Italy , 2013 .

[20]  Jérôme Massiani,et al.  Estimating electric car’s emissions in Germany: an analysis through a pivotal marginal method and comparison with other methods , 2012 .

[21]  Jérôme Massiani,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of policies for the development of electric vehicles in Germany: Methods and results , 2015 .

[22]  Samuel M. Arons,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions from Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2008 .

[23]  Rahul D. Rajopadhye,et al.  Transportation Noise and Vibration-Sources, Prediction, and Control , 2013 .