9 Perceiving Animacy and Intentionality: Visual Processing or Higher-Level Judgment?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Rutherford. Evidence for Specialized Perception of Animate Motion , 2013 .
[2] Scott A. Love,et al. Perceiving intention in animacy displays created from human motion , 2013 .
[3] Willem E. Frankenhuis,et al. Design for learning: The case of chasing , 2013 .
[4] P. Nahin. Chases and Escapes: The Mathematics of Pursuit and Evasion , 2012 .
[5] Brian J Scholl,et al. Dissociating the Detection of Intentionality from Animacy in the Right Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[6] Jacob Feldman,et al. Exploring the mental space of autonomous intentional agents , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[7] Brian J Scholl,et al. Chasing vs. stalking: interrupting the perception of animacy. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] L. Rips. Causation From Perception , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[9] Julie D. Golomb,et al. A taxonomy of external and internal attention. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[10] Reginald B. Adams,et al. The science of social vision , 2010 .
[11] G. McCarthy,et al. Processing animacy in the posterior superior temporal sulcus , 2010 .
[12] D. Wegner,et al. Causes and consequences of mind perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[13] N. Kanwisher. Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[14] K. Nakayama,et al. Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] Robert T. Schultz,et al. The scope of social attention deficits in autism: Prioritized orienting to people and animals in static natural scenes , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[16] Chris L. Baker,et al. Action understanding as inverse planning , 2009, Cognition.
[17] Brian J. Scholl,et al. The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[18] Y. Sugita. Innate face processing , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[19] B. Scholl. What Have We Learned about Attention from Multiple-Object Tracking (and Vice Versa)? , 2009 .
[20] S. Mineka,et al. The Malicious Serpent: Snakes as a Prototypical Stimulus for an Evolved Module of Fear , 2009 .
[21] Robert T. Knight,et al. Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[22] Brian J. Scholl,et al. The origins of causal perception: Evidence from postdictive processing in infancy , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.
[23] Paula Tavares,et al. Paying attention to social meaning: an FMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[24] Nicole David,et al. Parametric induction of animacy experience , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.
[25] Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al. Attentional resources in visual tracking through occlusion: The high-beams effect , 2008, Cognition.
[26] G. Csibra. Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants , 2008, Cognition.
[27] J. Dovidio,et al. Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: Examination of the Relationship between Measures of Intergroup Bias , 2008 .
[28] D. Rakison,et al. Do infants possess an evolved spider-detection mechanism? , 2008, Cognition.
[29] A. Heberlein. Animacy and Intention in the Brain: Neuroscience of Social Event Perception , 2008 .
[30] Jason P. Mitchell. Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.
[31] R. Blake,et al. Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.
[32] L. Cosmides,et al. Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[33] D. Wegner,et al. Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.
[34] Pawan Sinha,et al. Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[35] Johan Wagemans,et al. Introduction to Michotte's heritage in perception and cognition research. , 2006, Acta psychologica.
[36] A. Treisman. How the deployment of attention determines what we see , 2006, Visual cognition.
[37] Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al. The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.
[38] M. D. Rutherford,et al. The Perception of Animacy in Young Children with Autism , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.
[39] B. Scholl,et al. Perceiving Causality after the Fact: Postdiction in the Temporal Dynamics of Causal Perception , 2006, Perception.
[40] B. Scholl,et al. How does attention select and track spatially extended objects? New effects of attentional concentration and amplification. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[41] T. McNamara. Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition , 2005 .
[42] P. Todd,et al. Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .
[43] Andrew B. Leber,et al. Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex , 2005, Psychological science.
[44] Karl J. Friston,et al. Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.
[45] Uta Frith,et al. Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.
[46] Steven B. Most,et al. What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.
[47] Ori Friedman,et al. Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’ , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[48] Mitsuo Kawato,et al. Activation of the Human Superior Temporal Gyrus during Observation of Goal Attribution by Intentional Objects , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[49] B. Scholl,et al. Effects of grouping and attention on the perception of causality , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[50] Ralph Adolphs,et al. Impaired spontaneous anthropomorphizing despite intact perception and social knowledge. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[51] Rachel Morgan,et al. Who is Doing What to Whom? Young Infants' Developing Sense of Social Causality in Animated Displays , 2004, Perception.
[52] M. Carrasco,et al. Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[53] S. Carey,et al. Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.
[54] R Saxe,et al. People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.
[55] A. Meltzoff,et al. The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.
[56] G. Csibra,et al. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naı̈ve theory of rational action , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[57] Alex Martin,et al. NEURAL FOUNDATIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL AND MECHANICAL CONCEPTS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[58] M. Corbetta,et al. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[59] B. Scholl,et al. Minds, modules, and meta-analysis. , 2001, Child development.
[60] A. Klin. Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The Social Attribution Task. , 2000, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.
[61] C. Frith,et al. Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.
[62] Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al. Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.
[63] Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al. Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[64] N. Emery,et al. The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[65] T. Allison,et al. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[66] U. Frith,et al. Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development , 2000 .
[67] A. Revonsuo. The reinterpretation of dreams: an evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming. , 2000, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[68] Z. Pylyshyn. Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.
[69] P. Todd,et al. How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions , 1999 .
[70] P. Todd,et al. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .
[71] P. Rochat,et al. Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality , 1997 .
[72] A. Premack,et al. Causal cognition : a multidisciplinary debate , 1996 .
[73] L. Kaufman,et al. Distinguishing Between Animates And Inanimates: Not By Motion Alone , 1995 .
[74] S. Lea,et al. Visual Perception of Intentional Motion , 1994, Perception.
[75] G. Butterworth,et al. Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception , 1994 .
[76] D. Premack,et al. The perception of intention. , 1989, Science.
[77] R. Gregory. Perceptions as hypotheses. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[78] M. Posner,et al. Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.
[79] J. N. Bassili. Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events , 1976 .
[80] R. B. Joynson. MICHOTTE'S EXPERIMENTAL METHODS , 1971 .
[81] Jaakko Hintikka,et al. On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .
[82] F. Heider,et al. An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .
[83] F. Welch,et al. Causes and Consequences , 2017, Nature.
[84] HighWire Press. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.