9 Perceiving Animacy and Intentionality: Visual Processing or Higher-Level Judgment?

We can identify social agents in our environment not only on the basis of how they look, but also on the basis of how they move—and even simple geometric shapes can give rise to rich percepts of animacy and intentionality based on their motion patterns. But why should we think that such phenomena truly reflect visual processing, as opposed to higher-level judgment and categorization based on visual input? This chapter explores five lines of evidence: (1) The phenomenology of visual experience, (2) dramatic dependence on subtle visual display details, (3) implicit influences on visual performance, (4) activation of visual brain areas, and (5) interactions with other visual processes. Collectively, this evidence provides compelling support for the idea that visual processing itself traffics in animacy and intentionality.

[1]  M. Rutherford Evidence for Specialized Perception of Animate Motion , 2013 .

[2]  Scott A. Love,et al.  Perceiving intention in animacy displays created from human motion , 2013 .

[3]  Willem E. Frankenhuis,et al.  Design for learning: The case of chasing , 2013 .

[4]  P. Nahin Chases and Escapes: The Mathematics of Pursuit and Evasion , 2012 .

[5]  Brian J Scholl,et al.  Dissociating the Detection of Intentionality from Animacy in the Right Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Exploring the mental space of autonomous intentional agents , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[7]  Brian J Scholl,et al.  Chasing vs. stalking: interrupting the perception of animacy. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  L. Rips Causation From Perception , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  A taxonomy of external and internal attention. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  The science of social vision , 2010 .

[11]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Processing animacy in the posterior superior temporal sulcus , 2010 .

[12]  D. Wegner,et al.  Causes and consequences of mind perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  N. Kanwisher Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Robert T. Schultz,et al.  The scope of social attention deficits in autism: Prioritized orienting to people and animals in static natural scenes , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Chris L. Baker,et al.  Action understanding as inverse planning , 2009, Cognition.

[17]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Y. Sugita Innate face processing , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  B. Scholl What Have We Learned about Attention from Multiple-Object Tracking (and Vice Versa)? , 2009 .

[20]  S. Mineka,et al.  The Malicious Serpent: Snakes as a Prototypical Stimulus for an Evolved Module of Fear , 2009 .

[21]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  The origins of causal perception: Evidence from postdictive processing in infancy , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Paula Tavares,et al.  Paying attention to social meaning: an FMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Nicole David,et al.  Parametric induction of animacy experience , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[25]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  Attentional resources in visual tracking through occlusion: The high-beams effect , 2008, Cognition.

[26]  G. Csibra Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: Examination of the Relationship between Measures of Intergroup Bias , 2008 .

[28]  D. Rakison,et al.  Do infants possess an evolved spider-detection mechanism? , 2008, Cognition.

[29]  A. Heberlein Animacy and Intention in the Brain: Neuroscience of Social Event Perception , 2008 .

[30]  Jason P. Mitchell Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[34]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[35]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Introduction to Michotte's heritage in perception and cognition research. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[36]  A. Treisman How the deployment of attention determines what we see , 2006, Visual cognition.

[37]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  M. D. Rutherford,et al.  The Perception of Animacy in Young Children with Autism , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[39]  B. Scholl,et al.  Perceiving Causality after the Fact: Postdiction in the Temporal Dynamics of Causal Perception , 2006, Perception.

[40]  B. Scholl,et al.  How does attention select and track spatially extended objects? New effects of attentional concentration and amplification. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  T. McNamara Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition , 2005 .

[42]  P. Todd,et al.  Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .

[43]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex , 2005, Psychological science.

[44]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[45]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[46]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.

[47]  Ori Friedman,et al.  Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’ , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Activation of the Human Superior Temporal Gyrus during Observation of Goal Attribution by Intentional Objects , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  B. Scholl,et al.  Effects of grouping and attention on the perception of causality , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Ralph Adolphs,et al.  Impaired spontaneous anthropomorphizing despite intact perception and social knowledge. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Rachel Morgan,et al.  Who is Doing What to Whom? Young Infants' Developing Sense of Social Causality in Animated Displays , 2004, Perception.

[52]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  S. Carey,et al.  Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[54]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[55]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  G. Csibra,et al.  Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naı̈ve theory of rational action , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Alex Martin,et al.  NEURAL FOUNDATIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL AND MECHANICAL CONCEPTS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[58]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  B. Scholl,et al.  Minds, modules, and meta-analysis. , 2001, Child development.

[60]  A. Klin Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The Social Attribution Task. , 2000, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[61]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[62]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[63]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[64]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[65]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  U. Frith,et al.  Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development , 2000 .

[67]  A. Revonsuo The reinterpretation of dreams: an evolutionary hypothesis of the function of dreaming. , 2000, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[68]  Z. Pylyshyn Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[69]  P. Todd,et al.  How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions , 1999 .

[70]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[71]  P. Rochat,et al.  Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality , 1997 .

[72]  A. Premack,et al.  Causal cognition : a multidisciplinary debate , 1996 .

[73]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Distinguishing Between Animates And Inanimates: Not By Motion Alone , 1995 .

[74]  S. Lea,et al.  Visual Perception of Intentional Motion , 1994, Perception.

[75]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception , 1994 .

[76]  D. Premack,et al.  The perception of intention. , 1989, Science.

[77]  R. Gregory Perceptions as hypotheses. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[78]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[79]  J. N. Bassili Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events , 1976 .

[80]  R. B. Joynson MICHOTTE'S EXPERIMENTAL METHODS , 1971 .

[81]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .

[82]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[83]  F. Welch,et al.  Causes and Consequences , 2017, Nature.

[84]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.