Assessment of connected vehicle information quality for signalised traffic control

Connected vehicles (CVs) present a great opportunity to smooth and improve traffic flows at intersections thanks to their communication capabilities, which may allow a real-time flow of information with the controllers operating traffic signals. Therefore, it is reasonable to envision that, in the near future, CV data may complement or replace spot detector data that is currently used to operate traffic signals. However, CV data may be affected by errors, such as positioning error, which may depend on the technology that is employed for collecting such information. In this paper, we investigate the performances of different control strategies, namely a strategy that employs only aggregated information, such as queue lengths, and a strategy using disaggregated vehicle-based information, when they are operated with CV data, considering various realistic measurement accuracy settings. Our experiments, conducted via microscopic simulations, show that the disaggregated strategy features better performance and robustness in most of the tested scenarios.

[1]  Tom Cherrett,et al.  Augmenting Traffic Signal Control Systems for Urban Road Networks With Connected Vehicles , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Martin Schaefer,et al.  Assessing absolute and relative accuracy of recreation‐grade and mobile phone GNSS devices: a method for informing device choice , 2015 .

[3]  Kevin Lee,et al.  Signal Timing Manual , 2015 .

[4]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Max pressure control of a network of signalized intersections , 2013 .

[5]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Back-pressure traffic signal control with unknown routing rates , 2013, ArXiv.

[6]  Ibrahim Tiryakioglu,et al.  Examining the Accuracy of Network RTK and Long Base RTK Methods with Repetitive Measurements , 2019, J. Sensors.

[7]  Meng Li,et al.  Connected vehicle-based red-light running prediction for adaptive signalized intersections , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[8]  S. Ilgin Guler,et al.  Isolated intersection control for various levels of vehicle technology: Conventional, connected, and automated vehicles , 2016 .

[9]  Anastasios Kouvelas,et al.  Maximum Pressure Controller for Stabilizing Queues in Signalized Arterial Networks , 2014 .

[10]  Pete Bettinger,et al.  Smartphone GPS accuracy study in an urban environment , 2019, PloS one.

[11]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  The Max-Pressure Controller for Arbitrary Networks of Signalized Intersections , 2013 .

[12]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Cooperative Method of Traffic Signal Optimization and Speed Control of Connected Vehicles at Isolated Intersections , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  P. Lowrie SCATS: Sydney Co-Ordinated Adaptive Traffic System: a traffic responsive method of controlling urban traffic , 1990 .

[14]  Michael J. Rycroft,et al.  Understanding GPS. Principles and Applications , 1997 .

[15]  Wang,et al.  Review of road traffic control strategies , 2003, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  Li Li,et al.  Urban traffic signal control with connected and automated vehicles: A survey , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[17]  Claudio Roncoli,et al.  User throughput optimization for signalized intersection in a connected vehicle environment , 2019, 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[18]  R D Bretherton,et al.  SCOOT-a Traffic Responsive Method of Coordinating Signals , 1981 .