The Hermann Grid Illusion: A Tool for Studying Human Perceptive Field Organization

Psychophysical research on the Hermann grid illusion is reviewed and possible neurophysiological mechanisms are discussed. The illusion is most plausibly explained by lateral inhibition within the concentric receptive fields of retinal and/or geniculate ganglion cells, with contributions by the binocular orientation-specific cortical cells. Results may be summarized as follows: (a) For a strong Hermann grid illusion to be seen bar width must be matched to the mean size of receptive-field centers at any given retinal eccentricity. (b) With the use of this rationale, the diameter of foveal perceptive-field centers (the psychophysical correlate of receptive-field centers) has been found to be in the order of 4–5 min arc and that of total fields (centers plus surrounds) 18 min arc. These small diameters explain why the illusion tends to be absent in foveal vision. (c) With increasing distance from the fovea, perceptive-field centers increase to 1.7 deg at 15 deg eccentricity and then to 3.4 deg at 60 deg eccentricity. This doubling in diameter agrees with the change in size of retinal receptive-field centers in the monkey. (d) The Hermann grid illusion is diminished with dark adaptation. This finding is consistent with the reduction of the center—surround antagonism in retinal receptive fields. (e) The illusion is also weakened when the grid is presented diagonally, which suggests a contribution by the orientation-sensitive cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex. (f) Strong induction effects, similar to the bright and dark spots in the Hermann grid illusion, may be elicited by grids made of various shades of grey; and by grids varying only in chroma or hue. Not accounted for are: the illusory spots occurring in an outline grid ie with hollow squares, and the absence of an illusion when extra bars are added to the grid. Alternative explanations are discussed for the spurious lines connecting the illusory spots along the diagonals and the fuzzy dark bands traversing the rhombi in modified Hermann grids.

[1]  Sound: A Course of Eight Lectures Delivered at the Royal Institution of Great Britain , 1868, The British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review.

[2]  Ewald Hering,et al.  Grundzüge der Lehre vom Lichtsinn. , 1920 .

[3]  K. Motokawa.  Field of retinal induction and optical illusion. , 1950, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  S. W. Kuffler.  Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. , 1953, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Monje.  [Light sensitivity in marginal and inner contrast]. , 1955, Pflugers Archiv fur die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere.

[6]  H. Barlow,et al.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  G. Békésy.  Neural inhibitory units of the eye and skin. Quantitative description of contrast phenomena. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of optic nerve fibres in the spider monkey , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  F J VERHEIJEN,et al.  A simple after image method demonstrating the involuntary multidirectional eye movements during fixation. , 1961, Optica acta.

[10]  Günter Baumgartner,et al.  Die Reaktionen der Neurone des zentralen visuellen Systems der Katze im simultanen Helligkeitskontrast , 1961 .

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[13]  D. Hubel,et al.  Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey. , 1966, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Westheimer.  Spatial interaction in human cone vision , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  Border-visibility investigation of the Hermann grid. , 1969, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[17]  Koiti Motokawa,et al.  Physiology of Color and Pattern Vision , 1970 .

[18]  F. Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  L Maffei,et al.  Retinogeniculate convergence and analysis of contrast. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  H B Barlow,et al.  Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology? , 1972, Perception.

[22]  P. Hammond.  Contrasts in spatial organization of receptive fields at geniculate and retinal levels: centre surround and outer surround , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  R. Jung.  Visual Perception and Neurophysiology , 1973 .

[24]  P Gouras,et al.  Opponent‐colour cells in different layers of foveal striate cortex , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  E. Wist.  Mach bands and depth adjacency , 1974 .

[26]  P. Gouras,et al.  Functional properties of ganglion cells of the rhesus monkey retina. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  Dark adaptation and the Hermann grid illusion , 1976 .

[28]  R. Schachar,et al.  The "pincushion grid" illusion. , 1976, Science.

[29]  M. L Rudee,et al.  Optical transforms and the "pincushion grid" illusion? , 1977, Science.

[30]  N J Wade,et al.  Op Art and Visual Perception , 1978, Perception.

[31]  Alan Costall,et al.  Detection thresholds of the hermann grid illusion , 1978, Vision Research.

[32]  A L Ochs,et al.  Is Fourier analysis performed by the visual system or by the visual investigator. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[33]  F. Kitterle,et al.  Enhancement of apparent contrast in flashed sinusoidal gratings , 1979, Vision Research.

[34]  J. Bergen,et al.  A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision , 1979, Vision Research.

[35]  Chromatic Induction Effects in the Hermann Grid Illusion , 1979, Perception.

[36]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Perceptive field size in fovea and periphery of the light- and dark-adapted retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[37]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Saturation enhancement in colored hermann grids varying only in chroma , 1980, Vision Research.

[38]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Illusory colour changes in Hermann grids varying only in hue , 1981, Vision Research.

[39]  M White,et al.  The Effect of the Nature of the Surround on the Perceived Lightness of Grey Bars within Square-Wave Test Gratings , 1981, Perception.

[40]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Perceptive Field Sizes and a New Version of the Hermann Grid , 1981, Perception.

[41]  Tom Troscianko,et al.  A stereoscopic presentation of the hermann grid , 1982, Vision Research.

[42]  T. Troscianko.  A given visual field location has a wide range of perceptive field sizes , 1982, Vision Research.

[43]  M. McCourt.  A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect , 1982, Vision Research.

[44]  B. Boycott,et al.  A spatial analysis of on- and off-ganglion cells in the cat retina , 1983, Vision Research.

[45]  H. Barlow.  Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[46]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Brightness Matching, Brightness Cancellation, and Increment Threshold in the Ehrenstein Illusion , 1984, Perception.

[47]  J. Wolfe.  Global Factors in the Hermann Grid Illusion , 1984, Perception.

[48]  H. Barlow.  The Twelfth Bartlett Memorial Lecture: The Role of Single Neurons in the Psychology of Perception , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[49]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.

[50]  R. Watt,et al.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[51]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Visual grating induction. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[52]  L. Spillmann,et al.  A comparison of perceptive and receptive fields in man and monkey. , 1987, Human neurobiology.

[53]  Deborah J. Aks,et al.  A method to assess the relative contribution of lateral inhibition to the magnitude of visual-geometric illusions , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: A unified model of classical and recent phenomena , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  Physiological Constraints on the Visual Aesthetic Response , 1988 .

[56]  M. Morgan,et al.  Perceived diagonals in grids and lattices , 1989, Vision Research.

[57]  K. A. Stevens,et al.  The Analogy between Stereo Depth and Brightness , 1989, Perception.

[58]  M. McCourt.  Disappearance of grating induction at scotopic luminances , 1990, Vision Research.

[59]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A multi-channel approach to brightness coding , 1992, Vision Research.

[60]  Peter H. Schiller,et al.  The ON and OFF channels of the visual system , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[61]  D. Laming.  Springer's lines and Hermann's grid , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[62]  M. McCourt,et al.  Contrast-matching analysis of grating induction and suprathreshold contrast perception. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.