Feature-based morphometry: Discovering group-related anatomical patterns

This paper presents feature-based morphometry (FBM), a new fully data-driven technique for discovering patterns of group-related anatomical structure in volumetric imagery. In contrast to most morphometry methods which assume one-to-one correspondence between subjects, FBM explicitly aims to identify distinctive anatomical patterns that may only be present in subsets of subjects, due to disease or anatomical variability. The image is modeled as a collage of generic, localized image features that need not be present in all subjects. Scale-space theory is applied to analyze image features at the characteristic scale of underlying anatomical structures, instead of at arbitrary scales such as global or voxel-level. A probabilistic model describes features in terms of their appearance, geometry, and relationship to subject groups, and is automatically learned from a set of subject images and group labels. Features resulting from learning correspond to group-related anatomical structures that can potentially be used as image biomarkers of disease or as a basis for computer-aided diagnosis. The relationship between features and groups is quantified by the likelihood of feature occurrence within a specific group vs. the rest of the population, and feature significance is quantified in terms of the false discovery rate. Experiments validate FBM clinically in the analysis of normal (NC) and Alzheimer's (AD) brain images using the freely available OASIS database. FBM automatically identifies known structural differences between NC and AD subjects in a fully data-driven fashion, and an equal error classification rate of 0.80 is achieved for subjects aged 60-80 years exhibiting mild AD (CDR=1).

[1]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Morphological classification of brains via high-dimensional shape transformations and machine learning methods , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  COMMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES Why Voxel-Based Morphometry Should Be Used , 2001 .

[3]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  An Anatomical Equivalence Class Based Joint Transformation-Residual Descriptor for Morphological Analysis , 2007, IPMI.

[4]  M. Weiner,et al.  Automated MRI measures identify individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease* , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  P. Schönemann On artificial intelligence , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Growth patterns in the developing brain detected by using continuum mechanical tensor maps , 2000, Nature.

[7]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Discovering Modes of an Image Population through Mixture Modeling , 2008, MICCAI.

[8]  Karl Rohr On 3D differential operators for detecting point landmarks , 1997, Image Vis. Comput..

[9]  A. McKinney,et al.  Automated MRI measures identify individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease , 2010 .

[10]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Probabilistic approaches for atlasing normal and disease-specific brain variability , 2001, Anatomy and Embryology.

[11]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[12]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[13]  John G. Csernansky,et al.  Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI Data in Young, Middle Aged, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Weakly Supervised Scale-Invariant Learning of Models for Visual Recognition , 2007, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  J. Koenderink The structure of images , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Automatically learning cortical folding patterns , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[17]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Feature Detection with Automatic Scale Selection , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Defining cortical sulcus patterns using partial clustering based on bootstrap and bagging , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[19]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Multi-scale phase-based local features , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[20]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of intersubject brain registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[24]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Image-driven population analysis through mixture modeling , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[25]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  A Unified Framework for MR Based Disease Classification , 2009, IPMI.

[26]  山浦 晶 Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci, Michio Ono, Stefan Kubik and Chad D. Abernathey著, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York 1990(らいぶらりい) , 1992 .

[27]  James V. Miller,et al.  Atlas Stratification , 2006, MICCAI.

[28]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Automatic Inference of Sulcus Patterns Using 3D Moment Invariants , 2007, MICCAI.

[29]  Arno Klein,et al.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[30]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  “Voxel-Based Morphometry” Should Not Be Used with Imperfectly Registered Images , 2001, NeuroImage.

[31]  J. -B. Poline,et al.  Structural Group Analysis of Functional Activation Maps , 2000, NeuroImage.

[32]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Unified Statistical Approach to Deformation-Based Morphometry , 2001, NeuroImage.

[33]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  N-Sift: N-Dimensional Scale Invariant Feature Transform for Matching Medical Images , 2007, ISBI.

[34]  Christopher G. Harris,et al.  A Combined Corner and Edge Detector , 1988, Alvey Vision Conference.

[35]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Structural Analysis of fMRI Data Revisited: Improving the Sensitivity and Reliability of fMRI Group Studies , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Regional Shape Abnormalities in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, NeuroImage.

[37]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Visualization in biomedical computing , 1999, Parallel Comput..

[38]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  MRI-Based Automated Computer Classification of Probable AD Versus Normal Controls , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry , 2015 .

[40]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[41]  D. Selkoe Alzheimer's disease. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[42]  Arno Klein,et al.  Mindboggle: a scatterbrained approach to automate brain labeling , 2005, NeuroImage.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Identifying global anatomical differences: Deformation‐based morphometry , 1998 .

[44]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Why Voxel-Based Morphometry Should Be Used , 2001, NeuroImage.

[46]  T Lindeberg,et al.  Analysis of brain activation patterns using a 3‐D scale‐space primal sketch , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[47]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[48]  Morten Bro-Nielsen,et al.  Fast Fluid Registration of Medical Images , 1996, VBC.

[49]  Matthew Toews,et al.  A Statistical Parts-Based Model of Anatomical Variability , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[50]  G. Bruyn Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci, M. Ono, S. Kubik, Chad D. Abernathey (Eds.). Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York (1990), 232, DM 298 , 1990 .

[51]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Object-based morphometry of the cerebral cortex , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[52]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Full orientation invariance and improved feature selectivity of 3D SIFT with application to medical image analysis , 2008, 2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

[53]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Deformation-based mapping of volume change from serial brain MRI in the presence of local tissue contrast change , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[54]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Scale-Space Filtering , 1983, IJCAI.

[55]  F. Bookstein Thin-plate splines and decomposition of deformation , 1989 .

[56]  C. Jack,et al.  3D maps from multiple MRI illustrate changing atrophy patterns as subjects progress from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[57]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[58]  小野 道夫,et al.  Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci , 1990 .

[59]  C. Jack,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , 2008 .

[60]  Michael Brady,et al.  Saliency, Scale and Image Description , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[61]  D. Kendall A Survey of the Statistical Theory of Shape , 1989 .

[62]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[63]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  COMPARE: Classification of Morphological Patterns Using Adaptive Regional Elements , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[64]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[65]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[66]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[67]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Why voxel-based morphometric analysis should be used with great caution when characterizing group differences , 2004, NeuroImage.

[68]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[69]  R A Young,et al.  The Gaussian derivative model for spatial vision: I. Retinal mechanisms. , 1988, Spatial vision.