Cognitive Architectures and Autonomy: A Comparative Review

Abstract One of the original goals of artificial intelligence (AI) research was to create machines with very general cognitive capabilities and a relatively high level of autonomy. It has taken the field longer than many had expected to achieve even a fraction of this goal; the community has focused on building specific, targeted cognitive processes in isolation, and as of yet no system exists that integrates a broad range of capabilities or presents a general solution to autonomous acquisition of a large set of skills. Among the reasons for this are the highly limited machine learning and adaptation techniques available, and the inherent complexity of integrating numerous cognitive and learning capabilities in a coherent architecture. In this paper we review selected systems and architectures built expressly to address integrated skills. We highlight principles and features of these systems that seem promising for creating generally intelligent systems with some level of autonomy, and discuss them in the context of the development of future cognitive architectures. Autonomy is a key property for any system to be considered generally intelligent, in our view; we use this concept as an organizing principle for comparing the reviewed systems. Features that remain largely unaddressed in present research, but seem nevertheless necessary for such efforts to succeed, are also discussed.

[1]  Jay Apt,et al.  A Mind Model for Multimodal Communicative Creatures & Humanoids , 1999 .

[2]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice , 1995, ICMAS.

[3]  Ron Sun,et al.  Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: The CLARION Cognitive Architecture: Extending Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation , 2005 .

[4]  Giovanni Pezzulo,et al.  A Schema Based Model of the Praying Mantis , 2006, SAB.

[5]  Bernard J. Baars,et al.  CONSCIOUSNESS IS COMPUTATIONAL: THE LIDA MODEL OF GLOBAL WORKSPACE THEORY , 2009 .

[6]  Kristinn R. Thórisson From Constructionist to Constructivist A.I , 2009, AAAI Fall Symposium: Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures.

[7]  Ravi Kiran Sarvadevabhatla,et al.  Cognitive Map Architecture Facilitation of Human–Robot Interaction in Humanoid Robots , 2009 .

[8]  Joanna Bryson,et al.  The Behavior-Oriented Design of Modular Agent Intelligence , 2002, Agent Technologies, Infrastructures, Tools, and Applications for E-Services.

[9]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, Ray Kurzweil. Viking Penguin, New York (2005), 602 pages plus index; $29.95 , 2006 .

[10]  James S. Albus,et al.  Toward a Generic Model for Autonomy Levels for Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) , 2003 .

[11]  B. Baars A cognitive theory of consciousness , 1988 .

[12]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Giovanni Pezzulo,et al.  DiPRA: a layered agent architecture which integrates practical reasoning and sensorimotor schemas , 2009, Connect. Sci..

[14]  John L. Pollock,et al.  OSCAR: An Architecture for Generally Intelligent Agents , 2008, AGI.

[15]  Michael Montagne,et al.  Dialogue , 2010, Substance use & misuse.

[16]  Pei Wang,et al.  Non-axiomatic reasoning system: exploring the essence of intelligence , 1996 .

[17]  Javier Snaider,et al.  The LIDA Framework as a General Tool for AGI , 2011, AGI.

[18]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Learning Smooth, Human-Like Turntaking in Realtime Dialogue , 2008, IVA.

[19]  Elena R. Messina,et al.  A Framework For Autonomy Levels For Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) , 2005 .

[20]  Pei Wang Problem-Solving under Insu cient Resources , 1995 .

[21]  Pat Langley,et al.  An Adaptive Architecture for Physical Agents , 2005, Web Intelligence.

[22]  Mark S. Boddy,et al.  An Analysis of Time-Dependent Planning , 1988, AAAI.

[23]  Pat Langley,et al.  Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.

[24]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Newell Test for a theory of cognition , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  Benjamin Johnston The Toy Box Problem (and a Preliminary Solution) , 2010, AGI 2010.

[26]  Stan Franklin,et al.  THE LIDA ARCHITECTURE: ADDING NEW MODES OF LEARNING TO AN INTELLIGENT, AUTONOMOUS, SOFTWARE AGENT , 2006 .

[27]  Ravi Kiran Sarvadevabhatla,et al.  Cognitive map architecture , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[28]  Ron Sun,et al.  From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: a bottom-up model of skill learning , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Constructionist Design Methodology for Interactive Intelligences , 2004, AI Mag..

[30]  Kristinn R. Thórisson Gandalf: an embodied humanoid capable of real-time multimodal dialogue with people , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[31]  Alexei V. Samsonovich,et al.  Toward a Unified Catalog of Implemented Cognitive Architectures , 2010, BICA.

[32]  Eric Nivel,et al.  Ikon flux 2.0 , 2007 .

[33]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Mind Model for Multimodal Communicative Creatures and Humanoids , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[34]  R. Kurzweil,et al.  The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology , 2006 .

[35]  J. Storrs Hall VARIAC: an Autogenous Cognitive Architecture , 2008, AGI.

[36]  Giovanni Pezzulo,et al.  Designing modular architectures in the framework AKIRA , 2007, Multiagent Grid Syst..

[37]  James S. Albus,et al.  Autonomy Levels For Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) framework, volume II :: framework models version 1.0 , 2007 .

[38]  John R. Anderson,et al.  ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[39]  John R. Anderson ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. , 1996 .

[40]  David Garlan,et al.  Architectural Mismatch or Why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts , 1995, 1995 17th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[41]  John E. Laird,et al.  Extending the Soar Cognitive Architecture , 2008, AGI.

[42]  Pei Wang,et al.  Rigid Flexibility: The Logic of Intelligence , 2006 .

[43]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Production System Models of Complex Cognition , 2008 .

[44]  Deb Roy,et al.  Semiotic schemas: A framework for grounding language in action and perception , 2005, Artif. Intell..