Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it

[1]  M. Minami.  How Children Learn the Meanings of Words , 2001 .

[2]  Susan A Gelman,et al.  Shape and representational status in children's early naming , 1998, Cognition.

[3]  Lori Markson,et al.  Intention and Analogy in Children's Naming of Pictorial Representations , 1998 .

[4]  P. Bloom.  Intention, history, and artifact concepts , 1996, Cognition.

[5]  S. Waxman,et al.  Stars and starfish: How far can shape take us? , 1996 .

[6]  A. Meltzoff.  Understanding the Intentions of Others: Re-Enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. , 1995, Developmental psychology.

[7]  D. K. Nelson,et al.  Principle-Based Inferences in Young Children's Categorization: Revisiting the Impact of Function on the Naming of Artifacts. , 1995 .

[8]  Barbara C. Malt,et al.  Do artifact concepts have cores , 1992 .

[9]  D. Dennett.  The Interpretation of Texts, People and Other Artifacts , 1990 .

[10]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[11]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[12]  D. K. Nelson,et al.  Attention to functional properties in toddlers' naming and problem-solving * , 1999 .

[13]  Lawrence A. Hirschfeld,et al.  How biological is essentialism , 1999 .

[14]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object Shape, Object Function, and Object Name , 1998 .

[15]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[16]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  What looks like a jiggy but acts like a zimbo?: A study of early word meaning using artificial objects , 1978 .