Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptually-integrated digital game: Comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the United States

This study investigates the potential of a digital game that overlays popular game-play mechanics with formal physics representations and terminology to support explicit learning and exploration of Newtonian mechanics. The analysis compares test data, survey data, and observational data collected during implementations in Taiwan and the United States with students in grades 7-9. Results demonstrate learning on some core disciplinary measures and high levels of learner engagement, indicating the potential benefits of this genre of conceptually-integrated games, but also suggesting that further research and development will be needed to more fully harness this potential. Encouragingly, striking similarities were observed across the two countries in terms of learning and engagement, suggesting that this genre of learning games may prove suitable for engaging students in active exploration of core science concepts across multiple countries.

[1]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Designing Assessments and Assessing Designs in Virtual Educational Environments , 2009 .

[2]  Gloria Snively,et al.  Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education† , 2001 .

[3]  J. George,et al.  Street Science and Conventional Science in the West Indies , 1988 .

[4]  Okhee Lee,et al.  Science Education and Student Diversity: Synthesis and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[5]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Games, Learning, and Society: Prediction and Explanation as Design Mechanics in Conceptually Integrated Digital Games to Help Players Articulate the Tacit Understandings They Build through Game Play , 2012 .

[6]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Games, Learning, and Society: Learning And Meaning In The Digital Age , 2012 .

[7]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  The Process of Conceptual Change in 'Force and Motion'. , 1997 .

[8]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Using Video Games to Support Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Learning of Basic Physics Principles , 2011 .

[9]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Electromagnetism Supercharged! Learning Physics with Digital Simulation Games , 2004, ICLS.

[10]  Jonathan P. Rowe,et al.  The effects of empathetic virtual characters on presence in narrative-centered learning environments , 2008, CHI.

[11]  Eric Klopfer,et al.  Using Simulations as a Starting Point for Constructing Meaningful Learning Games , 2012 .

[12]  B. D. Coller,et al.  Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Jean Fisher,et al.  Dream Machines , 2000 .

[14]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Initial understanding of vector concepts among students in introductory physics courses , 2003 .

[15]  James W. Stigler,et al.  Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006-011. , 2006 .

[16]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Investigating the ‘‘Why’’ in Whypox , 2009, Games Cult..

[17]  J. Ivey,et al.  Ann Arbor, Michigan , 1969 .

[18]  John Sweller,et al.  Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load , 2005 .

[19]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  A research-based approach to improving student understanding of the vector nature of kinematical concepts , 2005 .

[20]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Software Design as a Learning Environment , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[21]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[22]  D. Bub,et al.  Video‐game training and naïve reasoning about object motion , 2009 .

[23]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[24]  Ann Rosebery,et al.  Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making , 2001 .

[25]  S. Herring,et al.  Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts , 2007 .

[26]  S. Engel Thought and Language , 1964 .

[27]  Y. Kafai,et al.  Children’s Participation in a Virtual Epidemic in the Science Classroom: Making Connections to Natural Infectious Diseases , 2006, Journal of science education and technology.

[28]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter , 2009 .

[29]  FreitasSara de,et al.  The use of 'exploratory learning' for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments , 2009 .

[30]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Model–based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum , 1995 .

[31]  Steven J. Chrostowski,et al.  TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. , 2004 .

[32]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[33]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[34]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  SURGE: integrating Vygotsky's spontaneous and instructed concepts in a digital game? , 2010, ICLS.

[35]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Good Video Games + Good Learning: collected essays on video games, learning and literacy , 2013 .

[36]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Design Principles of Next-Generation Digital Gaming for Education. , 2003 .

[37]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Spatial Learning and Computer Simulations in Science , 2009 .

[38]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Cross‐cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon , 1999 .

[39]  M. Chi,et al.  The Content of Physics Self-Explanations , 1991 .

[40]  Hisashi Otsuji,et al.  Japanese and Canadian Science Teachers' Views on Science and Culture , 2000 .

[41]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[42]  C. Wieman,et al.  PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning , 2008, Science.

[43]  Diane Jass Ketelhut,et al.  Teachers and game-based learning: Improving understanding of how to increase efficacy of adoption , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[44]  Chris Dede,et al.  Making Learning Meaningful: An explatory study of using multi-user environments (MUVEs) in middle school science. , 2005 .

[45]  B. White ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education , 1993 .

[46]  Andrea A. Disessa,et al.  Students' construction of qualitative physics knowledge: learning about velocity and acceleration in a computer microworld , 1991 .

[47]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games , 1998 .

[48]  湯淺 太一,et al.  20世紀の名著名論:Seymour Papert: Mindstorms:Children Computers and Powerful Ideas Basic Books New York 1980 , 2005 .

[49]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Design-based Research Strategies for Developing a Scientific Inquiry Curriculum in a Multi-User Virtual Environment , 2005 .

[50]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[51]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[53]  James Minogue,et al.  Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[54]  R. Mayer,et al.  Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .

[55]  Brian C. Nelson Exploring the Use of Individualized, Reflective Guidance In an Educational Multi-User Virtual Environment , 2007 .

[56]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[57]  E. Vandewater,et al.  Relation of adolescent video game play to time spent in other activities. , 2007, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[58]  R. Mayer,et al.  Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments , 2004 .

[59]  D'Angelo Cynthia,et al.  Scaffolding vector representations for student learning inside a physics game , 2010 .

[60]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[61]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Augmented Reality Simulations on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[62]  Jeffrey Mervis,et al.  Adding a T to the Three R's , 2009, Science.

[63]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Transformational Play as a Curricular Scaffold: Using Videogames to Support Science Education , 2009 .

[64]  Daniel Wendel,et al.  The Simulation Cycle: Combining Games, Simulations, Engineering and Science Using StarLogo TNG , 2009 .

[65]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[66]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[67]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[68]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[69]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Cognitive research and the design of science instruction , 1982 .

[70]  G. Hofstede Cultural differences in teaching and learning , 1986 .

[71]  S. Barab,et al.  Eat Your Vegetables and Do Your Homework: A Design­ Based Investigation of Enjoyment and Meaning in Learning , 2005 .

[72]  Sean C. Duncan,et al.  Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[73]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  A Multi-user virtual environment for building higher order inquiry skills in science , 2006 .

[74]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming , 2008 .

[75]  Sara de Freitas,et al.  The use of 'exploratory learning' for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[76]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[77]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  FormulaT Racing: combining gaming culture and intuitive sense of mechanism for video game design , 2010, ICLS.

[78]  E. Dieterle,et al.  Neomillennial Learning Styles and River City , 2023, Children, Youth and Environments.