Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP)

Abstract The process of translating strategic sustainability objectives into concrete action at project-specific levels is a difficult task. The multi-dimensional perspectives of sustainability such as economy, society, environment, combined with a lack of structured methodology and information at various hierarchical levels, further exacerbate the problem. This paper (Part 1 of a two-part series) proposes an analytical decision model and a structured methodology for sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects. The paper uses the ‘weighted sum model’ technique in multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and the ‘additive utility model’ in analytical hierarchical process (AHP) for multi-criteria decision making, to develop the model from first principles. It discusses the development of key performance indicators encapsulated within the analytical model. It concludes by discussing other potential applications of the proposed model and methodology for process automation as part of integrated sustainability appraisal in infrastructure design and construction. Part 2 uses a case study to demonstrate the model application in infrastructure sustainability appraisal at design stages. The paper also discusses the challenges for sustainability research, and gives recommendations.

[1]  Barry Commoner,et al.  The relation between industrial and ecological systems , 1997 .

[2]  T. Seager,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Framework for Structuring Remedial Decisions at Contaminated Sites , 2004 .

[3]  Ian Cooper,et al.  The implications of urban sustainability , 1998 .

[4]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems , 1998 .

[5]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  A taxonomy of metrics for testing the industrial ecology hypotheses and application to design of freezer insulation , 2004 .

[6]  S. Erkman Industrial ecology: An historical view , 1997 .

[7]  Onuegbu O. Ugwu,et al.  A Service-Oriented Framework for Sustainability Appraisal and Knowledge Management , 2005, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[8]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  On the Evaluation and Application of Different Scales For Quantifying Pairwise Comparisons in Fuzzy Sets , 1994 .

[9]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[10]  O. O. Ugwua,et al.  Ontological foundations for agent support in constructability assessment of steel structures — a case study , 2004 .

[11]  Thomas P. Seager,et al.  Combining Expert Judgement and Stakeholder Values with Promethee: A case Study in Contaminated Sediments , 2004 .

[12]  Pekka Salminen,et al.  Locating a Waste Treatment Facility by Multicriteria Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  H. Kunzi,et al.  Lectu re Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems , 1975 .

[14]  Leonardo Ensslin,et al.  Decision Support Systems in action: Integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[16]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[17]  Bruce Moore,et al.  The Australian modern Oxford dictionary , 1998 .

[18]  P. Huovila,et al.  Sustainable development and the future of construction , 1997 .

[19]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  Robert Bellandi,et al.  Strategic environmental management for engineers , 2004 .

[21]  Luc Bourdeau,et al.  Sustainable development and the future of construction: a comparison of visions from various countries , 1999 .

[22]  R. Fisher Applying ISO 14001 as a business tool for campus sustainability , 2003 .

[23]  J. J. Breen,et al.  Design for the environment and Green Chemistry: The heart and soul of industrial ecology , 1997 .

[24]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[25]  Joel Ann Todd,et al.  Continuous Improvement of the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Rating System™ , 2008 .

[26]  Patrizia Lombardi,et al.  "Sustainable Urban Development: the Framework and Directory of Assessment Methods" , 2002 .

[27]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  The development of cognitive models for constructability assessment in steel frame structures , 2004 .

[28]  Colin Yallop,et al.  The Macquarie Dictionary , 1996, English Today.

[29]  Barbara C. Lippiatt,et al.  BEES 4.0: Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability. Technical Manual and User Guide , 1998 .

[31]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  A taxonomy for measuring sustainability of construction projects , 2003 .

[32]  Jyri Seppälä,et al.  Decision Analysis Frameworks for Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment , 2001 .

[33]  Joonas Hokkanen,et al.  Multicriteria decision support in a technology competition for cleaning polluted soil in Helsinki , 2000 .

[34]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 2: A case study in bridge design , 2006 .

[35]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[36]  G.T.A. Smeltzer,et al.  Future studies in construction , 1994 .

[37]  R. Vreeker,et al.  Building environmental quality evaluation for sustainability through time (BEQUEST) , 2001 .

[38]  Will Focht,et al.  Public Participation in Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Assessment: A Shared Need , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  Dennis Owen United Nations: World Summit on sustainable development — Johannesburg South Africa 26 August to 24 September 2002 [Report A/Conf 199/20 (as re-issued)] , 2004 .

[40]  Patricia Ryan,et al.  Sustainability partnerships: eco‐strategy theory in practice? , 2003 .

[41]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making , 2001, Oper. Res..