Game-based learning apps in engineering education: requirements, design and reception among students

There is a lack of research on how game-based learning apps should be designed for engineering education. This paper addresses two research questions: What do engineering students expect from a learning app? Which educational approach and learning app design can meet these requirements? A survey revealed the particular demands of engineering students when using learning apps. They prefer apps that promote transfer of learning. They value a diversified game environment that leaves room for self-determined decisions. They want to use learning apps during five-minute breaks or on-the-go. Social interaction is only of minor importance. Concrete design and content guidelines are derived. Perceptual learning is an appropriate educational approach to meet the requirements. Two universally applicable task types for engineering education are discussed. A case study was conducted to investigate their use in practice. Following the guidelines, an app for heat-and-mass-transfer was generated and its impact on teaching was evaluated. Students considered that their requirements were met. This is reflected in the usage statistics: During one semester, 545 different students played a total of 27,350 games. As a measure of learning progress, the average score per game almost tripled. Apps that follow the guidelines have the potential to become well-accepted learning tools.

[1]  J. Glassey,et al.  Digital games in engineering education: systematic review and future trends , 2023 .

[2]  Martin Sillaots,et al.  A new approach to Gamification in engineering education: the Learner-Designer Approach to Serious Games , 2021, European Journal of Engineering Education.

[3]  Oliver Garbrecht,et al.  HeatQuiz: An app framework for game-based learning in STEM education , 2021, 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[4]  Fei Gao,et al.  A systematic review of mobile game-based learning in STEM education , 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[5]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions , 2020, Contemporary Educational Psychology.

[6]  Cleo Sgouropoulou,et al.  Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education , 2020, Comput. Educ..

[7]  A. Hartmann,et al.  To play or not to play: on the motivational effects of games in engineering education , 2019, European Journal of Engineering Education.

[8]  N. Menold,et al.  Design of Rating Scales in Questionnaires , 2019 .

[9]  Christoph Stampfer,et al.  Gelingensbedingungen von Innovationen in der Hochschullehre am Beispiel des Einsatzes der App phyphox , 2018 .

[10]  C. Stampfer,et al.  Advanced tools for smartphone-based experiments: phyphox , 2018, 1804.06239.

[11]  Raed S. Alsawaier The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement , 2018 .

[12]  O. Hinz,et al.  QuizApp zur Prüfungsvorbereitung – Vorbereitung von Prüfungssituationen mit Gaming-Effekten , 2018 .

[13]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Cognition and Metacognition within Self-Regulated Learning , 2017 .

[14]  Stelios Xinogalos,et al.  CMX: The Effects of an Educational MMORPG on Learning and Teaching Computer Programming , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[15]  Marcelo Macedo,et al.  Game-Based Learning: Analysis of Students’ Motivation, Performance, and Drop Out in a Production Engineering Course , 2017 .

[16]  Kari Alanne,et al.  An overview of game-based learning in building services engineering education , 2016 .

[17]  Janet Mannheimer Zydney,et al.  Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Emily B. Moore,et al.  Effective Student Learning of Fractions with an Interactive Simulation , 2015 .

[19]  K. Bogner,et al.  Antworttendenzen in standardisierten Umfragen , 2014 .

[20]  Ioanna Iacovides,et al.  Racing Academy: A Case Study of a Digital Game for Supporting Students Learning of Physics and Engineering , 2013 .

[21]  A. Bandura Going Global With Social Cognitive Theory: From Prospect to Paydirt , 2012 .

[22]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Import of Knowledge Export: Connecting Findings and Theories of Transfer of Learning , 2012 .

[23]  Jan T. van der Veen,et al.  The learning effects of computer simulations in science education , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Torsten Melles,et al.  Wie gestalte ich gute Items und Interviewfragen , 2012 .

[25]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  J. McCabe Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[27]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Comparing questions with agree/ disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options , 2010 .

[28]  Ji Y. Son,et al.  Perceptual Learning Modules in Mathematics: Enhancing Students' Pattern Recognition, Structure Extraction, and Fluency , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[29]  B. D. Coller,et al.  Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[30]  C. Wieman,et al.  PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning , 2008, Science.

[31]  Ioanna Iacovides,et al.  Game-based learning in engineering education , 2008 .

[32]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  A powerful tool for teaching science , 2006 .

[34]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction , 2004 .

[35]  Nikos J Mourtos,et al.  Defining, teaching, and assessing problem solving skills , 2004 .

[36]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[37]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[38]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[39]  Teresa Garcia,et al.  Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. , 1994 .

[40]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[41]  J. Krosnick Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[42]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  L. Winner Technologies as Forms of Life , 1983 .

[44]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  Gamification : Toward a Definition , 2022 .