Intent aware adaptive admittance control for physical Human-Robot Interaction

Effective physical Human-Robot Interaction (pHRI) needs to account for variable human dynamics and also predict human intent. Recently, there has been a lot of progress in adaptive impedance and admittance control for human-robot interaction. Not as many contributions have been reported on online adaptation schemes that can accommodate users with varying physical strength and skill level during interaction with a robot. The goal of this paper is to present and evaluate a novel adaptive admittance controller that can incorporate human intent, nominal task models, as well as variations in the robot dynamics. An outer-loop controller is developed using an ARMA model which is tuned using an adaptive inverse control technique. An inner-loop neuroadaptive controller linearizes the robot dynamics. Working in conjunction and online, this two-loop technique offers an elegant way to decouple the pHRI problem. Experimental results are presented comparing the performance of different types of admittance controllers. The results show that efficient online adaptation of the robot admittance model for different human subjects can be achieved. Specifically, the adaptive admittance controller reduces jerk which results in a smooth human-robot interaction.

[1]  Hao Ding,et al.  Optimized task distribution for industrial assembly in mixed human-robot environments - Case study on IO module assembly , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[2]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  People tracking with human motion predictions from social forces , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Variable admittance control of a four-degree-of-freedom intelligent assist device , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Cartesian impedance control of redundant manipulators for human-robot co-manipulation , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Neural net robot controller with guaranteed tracking performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[8]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance control - An approach to manipulation. I - Theory. II - Implementation. III - Applications , 1985 .

[9]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[10]  Nikos A. Aspragathos,et al.  Fuzzy learning variable admittance control for human-robot cooperation , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Aude Billard,et al.  End-point impedance measurements at human hand during interactive manual welding with robot , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[12]  Christian Ott,et al.  Unified Impedance and Admittance Control , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Robust compliant motion for manipulators, part I: The fundamental concepts of compliant motion , 1986, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Dan O. Popa,et al.  An analysis of some fundamental problems in adaptive control of force and impedance behavior: theory and experiments , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Robust control of dynamically interacting systems , 1988 .

[16]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  A robot on the shoulder: Coordinated human-wearable robot control using Coloured Petri Nets and Partial Least Squares predictions , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[17]  Kiyoshi Ohishi,et al.  Variable mechanical stiffness control based on human stiffness estimation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics.

[18]  Katsuhisa Furuta,et al.  Adaptive impedance control to enhance human skill on a haptic interface system , 2012 .

[19]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Motion learning and adaptive impedance for robot control during physical interaction with humans , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[21]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive inverse control , 1987, Proceedings of 8th IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[22]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Impedance Learning for Robots Interacting With Unknown Environments , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.