Feature-based attention modulates the perception of object contours.

Feature-based attention is known to support perception of visual features associated with early and intermediate visual areas. Here we examined the role of feature-based attention in higher levels of object processing. We used a dual-task design to probe perception of poorly attended contour-defined or motion-defined loops while attention was occupied with congruent or incongruent feature detection tasks. Perception of the unattended task was better when concurrently presented with a congruent stimulus. However, this effect was eliminated when detection of the primary task was made easy suggesting that task-demand in object perception is feature specific. Our results provide evidence for the contribution of feature-based attention to object perception.

[1]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[2]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[3]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[4]  G. Shulman Attentional Modulation of a Figural Aftereffect , 1992, Perception.

[5]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple object tracking and attentional processing. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[8]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Illusory Contour Processing: Combined High-Density Electrical Mapping, Source Analysis, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Suzuki Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity? , 2001, Vision Research.

[10]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Goodale,et al.  Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The role of attention in visual processing. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 , 2005, Science.

[17]  Y. Yamane,et al.  Complex objects are represented in macaque inferotemporal cortex by the combination of feature columns , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[19]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Melcher,et al.  Implicit Attentional Selection of Bound Visual Features , 2005, Neuron.

[21]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  D. Sagi,et al.  Visual attention and perceptual grouping , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[25]  S. Treue,et al.  Feature-Based Attention Increases the Selectivity of Population Responses in Primate Visual Cortex , 2004, Current Biology.

[26]  Matthias Niemeier,et al.  A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Integration of Local Features into Global Shapes Monkey and Human fMRI Studies , 2003, Neuron.

[29]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[30]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published April 28, 2006 Attention to Form or Surface Properties Modulates Different Regions of Human , 2022 .

[31]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  R. Zemel,et al.  Experience-Dependent Perceptual Grouping and Object-Based Attention , 2002 .

[33]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  N. Lavie,et al.  The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces , 2003, Psychological science.

[35]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[36]  N. Rubin,et al.  fMRI Activation in Response to Illusory Contours and Salient Regions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2003, Neuron.

[37]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Coding of Border Ownership in Monkey Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Maria Concetta Morrone,et al.  Color and Luminance Contrasts Attract Independent Attention , 2002, Current Biology.

[39]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[41]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Figural aftereffects and spatial attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[43]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Contour Saliency in Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[44]  Leila Reddy,et al.  Face-gender discrimination is possible in the near-absence of attention. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[45]  Jon Driver,et al.  Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system , 1994, Nature.

[46]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color , 2003, Vision Research.

[47]  L. Itti,et al.  Search Goal Tunes Visual Features Optimally , 2007, Neuron.

[48]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[49]  Kimron Shapiro,et al.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision , 1994, Nature.

[50]  A. Dale,et al.  The Representation of Illusory and Real Contours in Human Cortical Visual Areas Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  D. Mumford,et al.  The role of the primary visual cortex in higher level vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[52]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[54]  Laurent Itti,et al.  Perceptual consequences of feature-based attention. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[55]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[57]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[58]  G. Yellen,et al.  Modulation of K+ current by frequency and external [K+]: A tale of two inactivation mechanisms , 1995, Neuron.

[59]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1) , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  J. Warm,et al.  Attentional processing and the subjective contour illusion. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  H. Nothdurft Faces and Facial Expressions do not Pop Out , 1993, Perception.

[62]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[63]  G K Humphrey,et al.  Parallel discrimination of subjective contours defined by offset gratings , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Attentional effort modulated by task difficulty , 1995, Vision Research.

[65]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[67]  B. Gibson,et al.  Shape Recognition Inputs To Figure-Ground Organization in Three-Dimensional Displays , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.