A Three-Dimensional Spatiotemporal Receptive Field Model Explains Responses of Area MT Neurons to Naturalistic Movies

Area MT has been an important target for studies of motion processing. However, previous neurophysiological studies of MT have used simple stimuli that do not contain many of the motion signals that occur during natural vision. In this study we sought to determine whether views of area MT neurons developed using simple stimuli can account for MT responses under more naturalistic conditions. We recorded responses from macaque area MT neurons during stimulation with naturalistic movies. We then used a quantitative modeling framework to discover which specific mechanisms best predict neuronal responses under these challenging conditions. We find that the simplest model that accurately predicts responses of MT neurons consists of a bank of V1-like filters, each followed by a compressive nonlinearity, a divisive nonlinearity, and linear pooling. Inspection of the fit models shows that the excitatory receptive fields of MT neurons tend to lie on a single plane within the three-dimensional spatiotemporal frequency domain, and suppressive receptive fields lie off this plane. However, most excitatory receptive fields form a partial ring in the plane and avoid low temporal frequencies. This receptive field organization ensures that most MT neurons are tuned for velocity but do not tend to respond to ambiguous static textures that are aligned with the direction of motion. In sum, MT responses to naturalistic movies are largely consistent with predictions based on simple stimuli. However, models fit using naturalistic stimuli reveal several novel properties of MT receptive fields that had not been shown in prior experiments.

[1]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  T. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[4]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  H. Rodman,et al.  Coding of visual stimulus velocity in area MT of the macaque , 1987, Vision Research.

[7]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  E Kaplan,et al.  Contrast affects the transmission of visual information through the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  R A Andersen,et al.  The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  D. Heeger Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[15]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Visual Response Properties of Striate Cortical Neurons Projecting to Area MT in Macaque Monkeys , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Shapley,et al.  Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Local velocity representation: evidence from motion adaptation , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  Hiroaki Okamoto,et al.  MT neurons in the macaque exhibited two types of bimodal direction tuning as predicted by a model for visual motion detection , 1999, Vision Research.

[21]  K. Sen,et al.  Spectral-temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds , 2022 .

[22]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Mechanisms of visual motion detection , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[24]  G D Lewen,et al.  Neural coding of naturalistic motion stimuli , 2001, Network.

[25]  Margaret S Livingstone,et al.  Two-Dimensional Substructure of MT Receptive Fields , 2001, Neuron.

[26]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[27]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  Speed skills: measuring the visual speed analyzing properties of primate MT neurons , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Gallant,et al.  Goal-Related Activity in V4 during Free Viewing Visual Search Evidence for a Ventral Stream Visual Salience Map , 2003, Neuron.

[29]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The Neural Representation of Speed in Macaque Area MT/V5 , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Andriana Olmos,et al.  A biologically inspired algorithm for the recovery of shading and reflectance images , 2004 .

[32]  J. Movshon,et al.  Dynamics of motion signaling by neurons in macaque area MT , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Gallant,et al.  Predicting neuronal responses during natural vision , 2005, Network.

[34]  Robert A. Frazor,et al.  Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Feng Qi Han,et al.  Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Features in Natural Scenes , 2005, PLoS biology.

[36]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  In praise of artifice , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  D. Bradley,et al.  Structure and function of visual area MT. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[38]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Receptive Field Properties of Neurons in the Early Visual Cortex Revealed by Local Spectral Reverse Correlation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  J. Gallant,et al.  Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex , 2006, Nature.

[41]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Carandini,et al.  The Statistical Computation Underlying Contrast Gain Control , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Movshon,et al.  Motion Integration by Neurons in Macaque MT Is Local, Not Global , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  S. David,et al.  Estimating sparse spectro-temporal receptive fields with natural stimuli , 2007, Network.

[45]  D. Bradley,et al.  Velocity computation in the primate visual system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  Au Naturel , 2008, Neuron.

[47]  M. Carandini,et al.  Functional Mechanisms Shaping Lateral Geniculate Responses to Artificial and Natural Stimuli , 2008, Neuron.

[48]  B. Willmore,et al.  Neural Representation of Natural Images in Visual Area V2 , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.