An Interlaced Extended Kalman Filter for sensor networks localisation

Sensor networks have become a widely used technology for applications ranging from military surveillance to industrial fault detection. So far, the evolution in micro-electronics has made it possible to build networks of inexpensive nodes characterised by modest computation and storage capability as well as limited battery life. In such a context, having an accurate knowledge about nodes position is fundamental to achieve almost any task. Several techniques to deal with the localisation problem have been proposed in literature: most of them rely on a centralised approach, whereas others work in a distributed fashion. However, a number of approaches do require a prior knowledge of particular nodes, i.e. anchors, whereas others can face the problem without relying on this information. In this paper, a new approach based on an Interlaced Extended Kalman Filter (IEKF) is proposed: the algorithm, working in a distributed fashion, provides an accurate estimation of node poses with a reduced computational complexity. Moreover, no prior knowledge for any nodes is required to produce an estimation in a relative coordinate system. Exhaustive experiments, carried on MICAz nodes, are shown to prove the effectiveness of the proposed IEKF.

[1]  David E. Culler,et al.  The effects of ranging noise on multihop localization: an empirical study , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[2]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[3]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Ecolocation: a sequence based technique for RF localization in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[4]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1999, DIALM '99.

[5]  Luigi Glielmo,et al.  Interlaced extended Kalman filter as deterministic nonlinear observer , 1999, 1999 European Control Conference (ECC).

[6]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Scalable, Ad Hoc Deployable, RF-Based Localization , 2002 .

[7]  Bill Jackson,et al.  Egerváry Research Group on Combinatorial Optimization Connected Rigidity Matroids and Unique Realizations of Graphs Connected Rigidity Matroids and Unique Realizations of Graphs , 2022 .

[8]  Alfred O. Hero,et al.  Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  David C. Moore,et al.  Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements , 2004, SenSys '04.

[10]  L. El Ghaoui,et al.  Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[11]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Geometric ad-hoc routing: of theory and practice , 2003, PODC '03.

[12]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[13]  Kim-Chuan Toh,et al.  Semidefinite Programming Approaches for Sensor Network Localization With Noisy Distance Measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[14]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[15]  Stergios I. Roumeliotis,et al.  Distributed multirobot localization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Luigi Glielmo,et al.  An interlaced extended Kalman filter , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[17]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Position-based routing in ad hoc networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[18]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Rigidity, computation, and randomization in network localization , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.