Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.

Adaptive network and exemplar-similarity models were compared on their ability to predict category learning and transfer data. An exemplar-based network (Kruschke, 1990a, 1990b, 1992) that combines key aspects of both modeling approaches was also tested. The exemplar-based network incorporates an exemplar-based category representation in which exemplars become associated to categories through the same error-driven, interactive learning rules that are assumed in standard adaptive networks. Experiment 1, which partially replicated and extended the probabilistic classification learning paradigm of Gluck and Bower (1988a), demonstrated the importance of an error-driven learning rule. Experiment 2, which extended the classification learning paradigm of Medin and Schaffer (1978) that discriminated between exemplar and prototype models, demonstrated the importance of an exemplar-based category representation. Only the exemplar-based network accounted for all the major qualitative phenomena; it also achieved good quantitative predictions of the learning and transfer data in both experiments.

[1]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment? , 1955, Psychological review.

[2]  R. Shepard Stimulus and response generalization: tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Shepard Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[4]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[5]  A. Parducci Chapter 5 – CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS: A RANGE–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS* , 1974 .

[6]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[7]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[8]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[9]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[10]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Strategies and classification learning , 1981 .

[11]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Relationships between item and category learning: Evidence that abstraction is not automatic , 1983 .

[12]  R. Nosofsky American Psychological Association, Inc. Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification , 2022 .

[13]  Mark W. Altom,et al.  Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  R. Nosofsky Overall similarity and the identification of separable-dimension stimuli: A choice model analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[16]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[17]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .

[19]  W. Estes Array models for category learning , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  D. Rumelhart Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation, Parallel Distributed Processing , 1986 .

[21]  W. Estes Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[23]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[24]  R. Nosofsky Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[26]  W. Estes,et al.  Toward a framework for combining connectionist and symbol-processing models☆ , 1988 .

[27]  G. Bower,et al.  Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning , 1988 .

[28]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A New Method for Investigating Prototype Learning , 1988 .

[30]  D. Medin,et al.  Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  William B Estes,et al.  Similarity , Frequency , and Category Representations , 1988 .

[32]  R. Nosofsky Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  W. Estes,et al.  Base-rate effects in category learning: a comparison of parallel network and memory storage-retrieval models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem , 1989 .

[35]  D. Massaro,et al.  Models of integration given multiple sources of information. , 1990, Psychological review.

[36]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist models of recognition memory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. , 1990, Psychological review.

[37]  D R Shanks,et al.  Connectionism and the Learning of Probabilistic Concepts , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  R. Nosofsky Relations between exemplar-similarity and likelihood models of classification , 1990 .

[39]  M. Gluck Stimulus Generalization and Representation in Adaptive Network Models of Category Learning , 1991 .

[40]  R. Nosofsky Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Robert M. Nosofsky,et al.  Exemplar-based approach to relating categorization, identification, and recognition , 1992 .

[42]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Measurement-free tests of a general state-space model of prototype learning , 1992 .

[43]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[44]  R. Nosofsky Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. , 1992 .