Implementation of Social Media Concepts for e-Government: Case Study of a Social Media Tool for Value Co-Creation and Citizen Participation

Some governments have proven social media's potential to generate value through co-creation and citizen participation, and municipalities are increasingly using these tools in order to become smart cities. Nevertheless, few public administrations have taken full advantage of all the possibilities offered by social media and, as a consequence, there is a shortage of case studies published on this topic. By analyzing the case study of the platform Santander City Brain, managed by the City Council of Santander Spain, the current work contributes to broaden the knowledge on ambitious social media projects implemented by local public administrations for e-Government; therefore, this case can be useful for other public sector's initiatives. The case studied herein proves that virtual social media are effective tools for civil society, as it is able to set the political agenda and influence the framing of political discourse; however, they should not be considered as the main channel for citizen participation. Among the results obtained, the authors have found that several elements are required: the determination and involvement of the government, a designated community manager to follow up with the community of users, the secured privacy of its users, and a technological platform that is easy to use. Additionally, the Public Private Partnership model provides several advantages to the project, such as opening new sources of funding.

[1]  Aaron Wachhaus,et al.  Governance as a Framework to Support Informatics , 2011 .

[2]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co‐creating unique value with customers , 2004 .

[3]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation , 2004 .

[5]  Burcu Mucan,et al.  Social Media Creates Competitive Advantages: How Turkish Banks Use This Power? A Content Analysis of Turkish Banks through their Webpages☆ , 2014 .

[6]  Tom Evens,et al.  E–deliberation 2.0 for smart cities: a critical assessment of two 'idea generation' cases , 2012 .

[7]  C. Hood The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[8]  Hans Schaffers,et al.  Developing a Policy Roadmap for Smart Cities and the Future Internet , 2011 .

[9]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Attitudinal and Behavioural Determinants Influencing Decision Makers When Adopting Integration Technologies in Local Government , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to E-Government , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Daren C. Brabham Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application , 2008, First Monday.

[12]  P. Millard,et al.  Transforming Government through e-Participation: challenges for e-Democracy. , 2012, European Conference On e-Government.

[13]  Antonio Padilla-Meléndez,et al.  Web and social media usage by museums: Online value creation , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[14]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[15]  Luis A. Hernández Gómez,et al.  Smart Cities at the Forefront of the Future Internet , 2011, Future Internet Assembly.

[16]  J. Wareham,et al.  A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona , 2012, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[17]  Rajeev Dwivedi,et al.  Role of Key Stakeholders in Successful E-Governance Programs: Conceptual Framework , 2012, AMCIS.

[18]  Kevin K. W. Ho,et al.  Value co-creation and purchase intention in social network sites: The role of electronic Word-of-Mouth and trust - A theoretical analysis , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Comparative performance Assessment of Smart Cities around the North Sea Basin , 2011 .

[20]  S. Osborne The new public governance? : emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance , 2010 .

[21]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Potential and promise of online volunteering , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Vicente Pina,et al.  E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[24]  John Willinsky,et al.  Open Journal Systems: An example of open source software for journal management and publishing , 2005, Libr. Hi Tech.

[25]  Arturo Molina,et al.  Value Co-creation and Co-innovation: Linking Networked Organisations and Customer Communities , 2009, PRO-VE.

[26]  F. Piller,et al.  Reducing the risks of new product development , 2006 .

[27]  Mohammad Reza Habibi,et al.  The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[29]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, HICSS.

[30]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? , 2011, ePart.

[31]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[32]  Carlota Lorenzo Romero,et al.  Adopción de redes sociales virtuales: ampliación del modelo de aceptación tecnológica integrando confianza y riesgo percibido , 2011 .

[33]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  Harnessing the Creative Potential among Users , 2004 .

[34]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Determinants of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing in SMEs , 2014 .

[35]  Ines Mergel,et al.  A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Maria Karakiza The Impact of Social Media in the Public Sector , 2015 .

[37]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[38]  Varun Grover,et al.  Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Analyzing the Social Web , 2013 .

[40]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[41]  M. García-Galera,et al.  Jóvenes comprometidos en la Red: El papel de las redes sociales en la participación social activa , 2014 .

[42]  Alison Powell,et al.  Metaphors for Democratic Communication Spaces: How Developers of Local Wireless Networks Frame Technology and Urban Space , 2011 .

[43]  Luis Muñoz,et al.  SmartSantander: Internet of Things Research and Innovation through Citizen Participation , 2013, Future Internet Assembly.

[44]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[45]  H. Krcmar,et al.  Community Engineering for Innovations: The Ideas Competition as a Method to Nurture a Virtual Community for Innovations , 2009 .

[46]  R. Burt Cooptive Corporate Actor Networks: A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing , 1980 .

[47]  Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko,et al.  Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services , 2014, AI & SOCIETY.

[48]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[50]  R. Hollands Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[51]  Thomas F. Stafford,et al.  Online Security Threats and Computer User Intentions , 2010, Computer.

[52]  Cheng-Chieh Wu,et al.  Toward a Smart Government: an Experience of E-Invoice Development in Taiwan , 2014, PACIS.

[53]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[54]  Lemuria Carter,et al.  Social Media Tools Adoption and Use by SMES: An Empirical Study , 2014, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[55]  Alan J. Tomkins,et al.  Public input for municipal policymaking: engagement methods and their impact on trust and confidence , 2010, DG.O.

[56]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  How Large U.S. Companies Can Use Twitter and Other Social Media to Gain Business Value , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[57]  Ajith Abraham,et al.  Models of Influence in Online Social Networks , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[58]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[59]  Rudolf Giffinger,et al.  Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of cities? , 2009, 5th International Conference Virtual City and Territory, Barcelona, 2,3 and 4 June 2009.

[60]  Alexander Gluhak,et al.  SmartSantander: The meeting point between Future Internet research and experimentation and the smart cities , 2011, 2011 Future Network & Mobile Summit.

[61]  J. Rajasekera,et al.  Serving the poor by marketing information: developing a sustainable village phone model in Bangladesh , 2010 .

[62]  Luis Muñoz,et al.  Towards experimentation-service duality within a Smart City scenario , 2012, 2012 9th Annual Conference on Wireless On-Demand Network Systems and Services (WONS).

[63]  Nils Walravens,et al.  Platform business models for smart cities: from control and value to governance and public value , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[64]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Cuts and reforms — Public services as we move into a new era , 2010 .

[65]  Lieven De Marez,et al.  Smart Ideas for Smart Cities: Investigating Crowdsourcing for Generating and Selecting Ideas for ICT Innovation in a City Context , 2012, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[66]  Darren G. Lilleker,et al.  Political Parties and Web 2.0: The Liberal Democrat Perspective , 2010 .

[67]  Luis Muñoz,et al.  SmartSantander: Experimentation and service provision in the smart city , 2013, 2013 16th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC).