Visual Features Underlying Perceived Brightness as Revealed by Classification Images

Along with physical luminance, the perceived brightness is known to depend on the spatial structure of the stimulus. Often it is assumed that neural computation of the brightness is based on the analysis of luminance borders of the stimulus. However, this has not been tested directly. We introduce a new variant of the psychophysical reverse-correlation or classification image method to estimate and localize the physical features of the stimuli which correlate with the perceived brightness, using a brightness-matching task. We derive classification images for the illusory Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet stimulus and a “real” uniform step stimulus. For both stimuli, classification images reveal a positive peak at the stimulus border, along with a negative peak at the background, but are flat at the center of the stimulus, suggesting that brightness is determined solely by the border information. Features in the perceptually completed area in the Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet do not contribute to its brightness, nor could we see low-frequency boosting, which has been offered as an explanation for the illusion. Tuning of the classification image profiles changes remarkably little with stimulus size. This supports the idea that only certain spatial scales are used for computing the brightness of a surface.

[1]  R. Näsänen Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.

[2]  L. Arend,et al.  Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 2. Reflectance variation , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[4]  Anirvan S. Nandy,et al.  Classification images with uncertainty. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[5]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Spatial profiles of local and nonlocal effects upon contrast detection/discrimination from classification images. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[6]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: A unified model of classical and recent phenomena , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  L. Arend,et al.  Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 1. Illuminance variation , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. Gilchrist Lightness, brightness, and transparency , 2009 .

[9]  D G Pelli,et al.  Close Encounters--An Artist Shows that Size Affects Shape , 1999, Science.

[10]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  N. Graham Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[12]  C. Tyler,et al.  What makes Mona Lisa smile? , 2004, Vision Research.

[13]  P. Laurinen,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of brightness polarity identification. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  P. Bennett,et al.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours , 2000, Current Biology.

[15]  M. Morrone,et al.  The lowest spatial frequency channel determines brightness perception , 2007, Vision Research.

[16]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[17]  P. Laurinen,et al.  Separation of edge detection and brightness perception , 2004, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Pelli,et al.  The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification , 2002, Vision Research.

[19]  Heiko Neumann,et al.  A Contrast- and Luminance-driven Multiscale Network Model of Brightness Perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[20]  Michael C. Mangini,et al.  Making the ineffable explicit: estimating the information employed for face classifications , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  D. Burr,et al.  Feature detection in human vision: a phase-dependent energy model , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[23]  S. Dakin,et al.  Natural image statistics mediate brightness ‘filling in’ , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Classification images: a tool to analyze visual strategies. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[25]  D. Burr Implications of the Craik-O'Brien illusion for brightness perception , 1987, Vision Research.