Neural Networks as Mechanisms to Regulate Division of Labor

In social insects, workers perform a multitude of tasks, such as foraging, nest construction, and brood rearing, without central control of how work is allocated among individuals. It has been suggested that workers choose a task by responding to stimuli gathered from the environment. Response-threshold models assume that individuals in a colony vary in the stimulus intensity (response threshold) at which they begin to perform the corresponding task. Here we highlight the limitations of these models with respect to colony performance in task allocation. First, we show with analysis and quantitative simulations that the deterministic response-threshold model constrains the workers’ behavioral flexibility under some stimulus conditions. Next, we show that the probabilistic response-threshold model fails to explain precise colony responses to varying stimuli. Both of these limitations would be detrimental to colony performance when dynamic and precise task allocation is needed. To address these problems, we propose extensions of the response-threshold model by adding variables that weigh stimuli. We test the extended response-threshold model in a foraging scenario and show in simulations that it results in an efficient task allocation. Finally, we show that response-threshold models can be formulated as artificial neural networks, which consequently provide a comprehensive framework for modeling task allocation in social insects.

[1]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Gwenaël Kaminski,et al.  Individual Experience Alone Can Generate Lasting Division of Labor in Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[4]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Larger colonies do not have more specialized workers in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2009 .

[5]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta) , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Neuroevolution: from architectures to learning , 2008, Evol. Intell..

[7]  J. Fewell,et al.  Colony response to graded resource changes: an analytical model of the influence of genotype, environment, and dominance. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[8]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Ant-like task allocation and recruitment in cooperative robots , 2000, Nature.

[9]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[10]  Per Kryger,et al.  Genotypical Variability for the Tasks of Water Collecting and Scenting in a Honey Bee Colony , 2000 .

[11]  D. Floreano,et al.  Evolutionary Conditions for the Emergence of Communication in Robots , 2007, Current Biology.

[12]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics: The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines , 2000 .

[13]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Inspiration for optimization from social insect behaviour , 2000, Nature.

[14]  Stefan C. Kremer,et al.  Recurrent Neural Networks , 2013, Handbook on Neural Information Processing.

[15]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[16]  G. Robinson,et al.  Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  Spring Berman,et al.  Optimized Stochastic Policies for Task Allocation in Swarms of Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[18]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Optimality theory in evolutionary biology , 1990, Nature.

[19]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Neural morphogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and evolution , 2001, Theory in Biosciences.

[20]  S. Cahan,et al.  Undertaking specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Sovan Lek,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction , 1999 .

[22]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  T. Seeley Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  T. Seeley The Wisdom of the Hive , 1995 .

[25]  Robert E. Page,et al.  Genetic determination of guarding and undertaking in honey-bee colonies , 1988, Nature.

[26]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[27]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Genetic Team Composition and Level of Selection in the Evolution of Cooperation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[28]  S. Pratt Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[29]  D. Gordon The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[30]  L. Keller,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Self-Organized Division of Labor in Social Insects , 2011 .

[31]  D. Floreano,et al.  Evolution of Adaptive Behaviour in Robots by Means of Darwinian Selection , 2010, PLoS biology.

[32]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[33]  S. Graham,et al.  Honey Bee Nest Thermoregulation: Diversity Promotes Stability , 2004, Science.

[34]  E. Wilson,et al.  Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies. , 1988, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  G. Robinson Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[36]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Multi-Robot Task Allocation in Uncertain Environments , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[37]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Dynamic Scheduling and Division of Labor in Social Insects , 2000, Adapt. Behav..

[38]  Sandra D. Mitchell,et al.  Self-organization and the evolution of division of labor , 1998 .

[39]  D. Floreano,et al.  Task-dependent influence of genetic architecture and mating frequency on division of labour in social insect societies , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[40]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  Recurrent Neural Networks for Prediction: Learning Algorithms, Architectures and Stability , 2001 .

[41]  G. Robinson Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: evidence for division of labor based on hormonall regulated response thresholds , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[42]  Nigel R Franks,et al.  Flexible task allocation and the organization of work in ants , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Gonzalo G de Polavieja,et al.  Structure of deviations from optimality in biological systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Raphaël Jeanson,et al.  Emergence of increased division of labor as a function of group size , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[45]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[46]  Benjamin P. Oldroyd,et al.  Genetic variance in honey bees for preferred foraging distance , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  S. Graham,et al.  Modelling the role of intracolonial genetic diversity on regulation of brood temperature in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.