An AHP-based method to assess the introduction of electric cars in a public administration

The adoption of electric vehicles in an organization's fleet can provide an emission-free urban transport, but such decision must be assessed from different perspectives (e.g. economic, environmental, social, etc.), particularly when there are multiple goals and stakeholders. The article presents a multiple criteria evaluation method which can be applied to support the decision on the adoption of electric cars by a public administration. The method has two main phases: analysis by indicators and multi-criteria analysis. The first phase can provide analytic results for each category of indicators, but the values are treated only in a disaggregate way and not summarized in a global indicator. Thus the multi-criteria methodology can provide an overall assessment of the alternatives based on the aggregation of the values obtained for all criteria (i.e. indicators). In summary, the goal of the method is to employ several indicators to measure the expected effects and synthesize them in an overall judgement, taking into consideration the different stakeholders points of view. The case study presented in the paper is an application of the structured evaluation method to the university fleet. The fleet consists of 24 cars with an average of only 5700 kilometres travelled. The indicators have been classified according to different impact areas: Economy, Energy, Environment, Society.

[1]  I Mergias,et al.  Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: the case of Cyprus. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  Paul Wolfram,et al.  Electric Vehicles: Literature review of technology costs and carbon emissions , 2016 .

[3]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[4]  Tzay-An Shiau,et al.  Developing an indicator system for local governments to evaluate transport sustainability strategies , 2013 .

[5]  Görkem F. Üçtuğ,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making-Based Comparison of Power Source Technologies for Utilization in Automobiles , 2015 .

[6]  Ralf Philipsen,et al.  Fast-charging station here, please! User criteria for electric vehicle fast-charging locations , 2016 .

[7]  C. C. Chan,et al.  The state of the art of electric and hybrid vehicles , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[8]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Development of a multi-criteria assessment model for ranking of renewable and non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles , 2009 .

[9]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[10]  H. A. Bekhet,et al.  Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: an empirical study in Malaysia , 2015 .

[11]  Mariya A. Sodenkamp,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Measurement Processes: The Measurement of Intangibles Decision Making under Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks , 2010 .

[12]  Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh,et al.  An integrated group decision making model and its evaluation by DEA for automobile industry , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Carlos Silva,et al.  A multi-criteria decision aid methodology to design electric vehicles public charging networks , 2015 .

[14]  Un-Habitat.  Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Global Report on Human Settlements 2013 , 2015 .

[15]  J.R.E. Harger,et al.  Definition of indicators for environmentally sustainable development , 1996 .

[16]  Kenneth Lebeau,et al.  Environmental and Financial Evaluation of Passenger Vehicle Technologies in Belgium , 2013 .

[17]  Michael H. Breitner,et al.  Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range? , 2017 .

[18]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations , 2012 .

[19]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  Romeo Danielis.  Inquinano maggiormente le auto elettriche o le auto convenzionali? Stime recenti, variabili determinanti e suggerimenti di politica dei trasporti , 2015 .

[21]  A. Talantsev.  Who Gains and Who Loses in the Shift to Electric Vehicles : Impact Assessment through Multi-criteria Multi-stakeholder Analysis , 2017 .

[22]  Heiko A. von der Gracht,et al.  Heading towards a multimodal city of the future , 2014 .

[23]  Heiko A. Gracht,et al.  A dissent-based approach for multi-stakeholder scenario development — The future of electric drive vehicles , 2013 .

[24]  Domenico Laforgia,et al.  A method to estimate the environmental impact of an electric city car during six months of testing in an Italian city , 2014 .

[25]  Milan Kljajin,et al.  APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT IN EVALUATION OF MOTOR VEHICLES' ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCES , 2012 .

[26]  Romeo Danielis,et al.  The private and social monetary costs and the energy consumption of a car. An estimate for seven cars with different vehicle technologies on sale in Italy , 2013 .

[27]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback , 2001 .