Depth benefits now loading: Visual working memory capacity and benefits in 3-D
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Richard D. Morey,et al. Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .
[2] C. Folk,et al. Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-blind” attentional spotlight , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[3] Dwight J. Peterson,et al. The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[4] Maro G. Machizawa,et al. Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.
[5] Geoffrey F Woodman,et al. Perceptual organization influences visual working memory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[6] K. Nakayama,et al. Visual short-term memory benefit for objects on different 3-D surfaces. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[7] J. Theeuwes,et al. Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-aware” attentional focus , 1997 .
[8] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Integrating space and time in visual search: How the preview benefit is modulated by stereoscopic depth , 2012, Vision Research.
[9] Jiehui Qian,et al. Evidence for the effect of depth on visual working memory , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[10] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.
[11] Yaoda Xu. Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: The roles of feature proximity and connectedness , 2006, Perception & Psychophysics.
[12] Melissa R. Beck,et al. Incidental learning of probability information is differentially affected by the type of visual working memory representation. , 2015, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[13] Nash Unsworth,et al. Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] Tandra Ghose,et al. Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[15] Roger W Remington,et al. Segmentation by depth does not always facilitate visual search. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[16] E. Vogel,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .
[17] Segregating targets and nontargets in depth eliminates inhibition of nontargets in multiple object tracking , 2008 .
[18] Edgar Erdfelder,et al. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[19] Kyle R. Cave,et al. Adding Depth to Overlapping Displays Can Improve Visual Search Performance , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] G. A. Miller. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .
[21] Adam Reeves,et al. Is visual short-term memory depthful? , 2014, Vision Research.
[22] Edward K. Vogel,et al. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.
[23] Irida Mance,et al. Visual working memory. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[24] N. Cowan. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.