Depth benefits now loading: Visual working memory capacity and benefits in 3-D

The present studies explored how performance in multidimensional displays varies as a function of visual working memory load, item distribution across depths, and individual capacity differences. In Experiment 1, the benefit of depth information (one depth vs. two depths) was examined across seven set sizes within a change-detection paradigm. Multiple depth planes engendered performance benefits with five items, but elicited performance decrements with three items. These effects were associated with working memory capacity, such that benefits were only observed when the working memory load exceeded an individual’s max capacity. Experiment 2 evaluated how the distribution of items in depth aids working memory performance. Equal distribution of items across depths produced higher accuracy compared with when the target was isolated in depth. Lastly, Experiment 3 explored how differences in working memory capacity affect an individual’s ability to use depth information to improve their performance. The results indicate that both low-capacity and high-capacity individuals can benefit from depth information, but this may vary as a function of working memory load. Overall, the results indicate that multidimensional displays can improve performance with sufficient working memory load, possibly through some sort of depth tag.

[1]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[2]  C. Folk,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-blind” attentional spotlight , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Dwight J. Peterson,et al.  The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory , 2005, Nature.

[5]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Visual short-term memory benefit for objects on different 3-D surfaces. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-aware” attentional focus , 1997 .

[8]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Integrating space and time in visual search: How the preview benefit is modulated by stereoscopic depth , 2012, Vision Research.

[9]  Jiehui Qian,et al.  Evidence for the effect of depth on visual working memory , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[11]  Yaoda Xu Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: The roles of feature proximity and connectedness , 2006, Perception & Psychophysics.

[12]  Melissa R. Beck,et al.  Incidental learning of probability information is differentially affected by the type of visual working memory representation. , 2015, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[13]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Tandra Ghose,et al.  Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[15]  Roger W Remington,et al.  Segmentation by depth does not always facilitate visual search. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[16]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[17]  Segregating targets and nontargets in depth eliminates inhibition of nontargets in multiple object tracking , 2008 .

[18]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[19]  Kyle R. Cave,et al.  Adding Depth to Overlapping Displays Can Improve Visual Search Performance , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[21]  Adam Reeves,et al.  Is visual short-term memory depthful? , 2014, Vision Research.

[22]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[23]  Irida Mance,et al.  Visual working memory. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[24]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.