Addressing the Long-term Evaluation of a Telepresence Robot for the Elderly

This paper presents aspects of an ongoing work for a long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot named GIRAFF, as a tool for facilitating interaction and support delivery to older people living at home. Most robotic systems are usually used for short periods of time and in laboratory settings, while this paper describes the challenges, both technological and related to the user evaluation that human-robot interaction should addressed in view of a real use of the technology for a long time span outside the laboratory. The work describes our experience in developing testing sites and in designing an evaluation plan to assess the potential of the GIRAFF platform for telepresence. We highlight open points related to the transition from a limited use in time (short term) to a significant period of time (long term). From a human-robot interaction perspective, we first introduce some results from the short term evaluation, obtained by interviewing 26 nurses as possible clients (people connecting to the robot) and 10 older adults as possible end users (people receiving visits through the robot). The paper describes then a complete evaluation plan designed for the long term assessment. From a technological point of view a set of mandatory “intelligent features” are taken into account that could enable a better real world deployment by inheriting capabilities form state-of-the-art autonomous intelligent robots.

[1]  Yeh-Liang Hsu,et al.  Developing a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with the elderly in a home environment. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[2]  P. Costa,et al.  Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). , 2003, European journal of psychological assessment : official organ of the European Association of Psychological Assessment.

[3]  D. Russell,et al.  The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  G. Zimet,et al.  The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support , 1988 .

[5]  C. H. Edwards Applied ergonomics. , 1990, Work.

[6]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[7]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Presence: concept, determinants, and measurement , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Katherine M. Tsui,et al.  Designing Telepresence Robot Systems for Use by People with Special Needs , 2011 .

[9]  A. Cesta,et al.  Enabling Social Interaction Through Embodiment in Ex CITE , 2010 .

[10]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[11]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  Towards evaluation of social robotic telepresence based on measures of social and spatial presence , 2011, HRI 2011.

[12]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[13]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis methodology for assessing product adoption by older user populations. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Psychological Implications of Domestic Assistive Technology for the Elderly , 2007, PsychNology J..

[15]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human–Robot Interaction , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Katherine M. Tsui,et al.  Exploring use cases for telepresence robots , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Peter C. Cheeseman,et al.  Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics , 1986, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[19]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots , 1985, Autonomous Robot Vehicles.

[20]  Paul D Thacker,et al.  Physician-robot makes the rounds. , 2005, JAMA.

[21]  David W. Schloerb,et al.  A Quantitative Measure of Telepresence , 1995, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[22]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  The Concept of Peis-Ecology: Integrating Robots in Smart Environments. , 2009 .

[23]  V. Leirer,et al.  Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. , 1982, Journal of psychiatric research.

[24]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  MONITORING ELDERLY PEOPLE WITH THE ROBOCARE DOMESTIC ENVIRONMENT: INTERACTION SYNTHESIS AND USER EVALUATION , 2011, Comput. Intell..

[25]  Lorenza Tiberio,et al.  Assessing the tolerance of a telepresence robot in users with Mild Cognitive Impairment – A protocol for studying users ’ physiological response – , 2011 .

[26]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[27]  Leila Takayama,et al.  "Now, i have a body": uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace , 2011, CHI.

[28]  Carrie Heater,et al.  Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[29]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[30]  Amy Loutfi,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Domestic Assistive Robots , 2008, AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems.