Parents as Learning Partners in the development of t echnological Fluency

This paper presents research on parent support of the development of new media skills and technological fluency. Parents’ roles in their children’s learning were identified based on in terviews with eight middle school students and their parents. All eight students were highly experienced with technology activities. Seven distinct parental roles that supported learning were identified and defined: Teacher, Collaborator, Learning Broker, Resource Provider, Nontechnical Consultant, Employer, and Learner. The parents in this sample varied in their level of technological knowledge, though in every family at least one parent worked in the computer industry as an engineer or designer. The paper presents the approach used to identify these roles, the coding system used, and examples of each role across the cases. The diversity and density of roles played by parents for individual students are also quantified. Findings indicate that for these eight learners parents play signifi cant roles in supporting creative technologically mediated activities. The findings highlight the importance of understanding family-based learning relationships when considering pathways to early expertise with new media.

[1]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. , 1946 .

[2]  J. Langlois,et al.  Mothers, fathers, and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behaviors in young children. , 1980 .

[3]  J. Garbarino.  The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design: by Urie Bronfenbrenner Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979, 330 + p. , 1980 .

[4]  Lauren A. Sosniak,et al.  Developing Talent in Young People , 1985 .

[5]  Geoffrey B. Saxe,et al.  Social processes in early number development. , 1987 .

[6]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  Models of Wisdom in the Teaching of History , 1991 .

[7]  M. Cole.  Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[8]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[11]  Elinor Ochs.  Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective , 1993 .

[12]  A. Paton.  WAYS WITH WORDS , 1995 .

[13]  S. Michaels,et al.  A pedagogy of Multiliteracies Designing Social Futures , 1996 .

[14]  Tracy Camp,et al.  The incredible shrinking pipeline , 1997, CACM.

[15]  B. Rogoff.  Cognition as a collaborative process. , 1998 .

[16]  G. Marshall,et al.  Against the Odds , 1999 .

[17]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  Being Fluent with Information Technology , 1999 .

[18]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy , 2000 .

[19]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Against the Odds: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Women in Mathematical, Scientific, and Technological Careers , 2000 .

[20]  J. Lemke.  Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems , 2000 .

[21]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Young People and New Media: Childhood and the Changing Media Environment , 2000 .

[22]  M. Warschauer.  Technology & School Reform: A View from Both Sides of the Tracks , 2000 .

[23]  Mary Gauvain,et al.  The social context of cognitive development , 2000 .

[24]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[25]  Maureen A. Callanan,et al.  Parents Explain More Often to Boys Than to Girls During Shared Scientific Thinking , 2001, Psychological science.

[26]  Xitao Fan,et al.  Parental Involvement and Students' Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[27]  C. Crook,et al.  Children's Computer Use at Home and at School: Context and continuity , 2002 .

[28]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[29]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: a five-year longitudinal study. , 2002, Child development.

[30]  Annette Lareau.  Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life , 2003 .

[31]  Brigid Barron.  Learning Ecologies for Technological Fluency: Gender and Experience Differences , 2004 .

[32]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Ecologies of Parental Engagement in Urban Education , 2004 .

[33]  D. Stipek,et al.  Low-Income Parents' Beliefs about Their Role in Children's Academic Learning , 2004, The Elementary School Journal.

[34]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Factors associated with the early emergence of intense interests within conceptual domains , 2004 .

[35]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[36]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Parenting behaviors associated with the maintenance of preschoolers' interests : A prospective longitudinal study , 2005 .

[37]  Amanda A. Madden.  Teen Content Creators and Consumers , 2005 .

[38]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in Society , 2005 .

[39]  H. Tenenbaum,et al.  Talking and reading science: Longitudinal data on sex differences in mother–child conversations in low-income families , 2005 .

[40]  S. Simpkins,et al.  Parents' Socializing Behavior and Children's Participation in Math, Science, and Computer Out-of-School Activities , 2005 .

[41]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development , 2006 .

[42]  Brigid Barron.  Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective , 2006, Human Development.

[43]  Jeannette M. Wing.  An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.

[44]  Jung-Sook Lee,et al.  Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the Achievement Gap Among Elementary School Children , 2006 .

[45]  Henry Jenkins.  Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[46]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide , 2007, New Media Soc..

[47]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  How Parent Explanation Changes What Children Learn from Everyday Scientific Thinking. , 2007 .

[48]  From teachers to testers: Parents' role in child expertise development in informal settings , 2007 .

[49]  K. Crowley,et al.  From teachers to testers: How parents talk to novice and expert children in a natural history museum , 2007 .

[50]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  The role of expertise in navigating links of influence , 2008 .

[51]  L. Plowman,et al.  Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home , 2008 .

[52]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[53]  伊藤 瑞子.  Living and learning with new media : summary of findings from the digital youth project , 2009 .

[54]  V. Rideout,et al.  Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds , 2010 .

[55]  Philip Bell,et al.  Parents, Science, and Interest , 2010 .

[56]  J. Epstein,et al.  School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring for the Children We Share , 2010 .

[57]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Preparing students for future learning with Teachable Agents , 2010 .