The Neural Basis of Object-Context Relationships on Aesthetic Judgment

The relationship between contextual information and object perception has received considerable attention in neuroimaging studies. In the work reported here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the relationship between aesthetic judgment and images of objects in their normal contextual setting versus images of objects in abnormal contextual settings and the underlying brain activity. When object-context relationships are violated changes in visual perception and aesthetic judgment emerges that exposes the contribution of vision to interpretations shaped by previous experience. We found that effects of context on aesthetic judgment modulates different memory sub-systems, while aesthetic judgment regardless of context recruit medial and lateral aspects of the orbitofrontal cortex, consistent with previous findings. Visual cortical areas traditionally associated with the processing of visual features are recruited in normal contexts, irrespective of aesthetic ratings, while prefrontal areas are significantly more engaged when objects are viewed in unaccustomed settings.

[1]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-down modulation of early sensory cortex , 1996, NeuroImage.

[2]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Kringelbach The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  Neural Correlates of Detecting Pretense: Automatic Engagement of the Intentional Stance under Covert Conditions , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  K. Rayner,et al.  The effect of background information on object identification , 2017 .

[6]  R. Dolan,et al.  The Kuleshov Effect: the influence of contextual framing on emotional attributions. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  tephen E. Palmer The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[9]  S. Zeki,et al.  Neural correlates of beauty. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Bar The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  D. Perrett,et al.  Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  D. Ariely,et al.  Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value fMRI and Behavioral Evidence , 2001, Neuron.

[13]  G. Fink,et al.  Neural activation during selective attention to subjective emotional responses , 1997, Neuroreport.

[14]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-down modulation of early sensory cortex. , 1997 .

[15]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[16]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Identification of objects in scenes: the role of scene background in object naming. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  J. Downar,et al.  A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[19]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[20]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  A voxel‐based morphometry study of semantic dementia: Relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[21]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[23]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Event-related fMRI of auditory and visual oddball tasks. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.

[25]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[26]  S. Zeki,et al.  Three cortical stages of colour processing in the human brain. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Neural bases of learning and memory: functional neuroimaging evidence , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[28]  I. Biederman Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.

[29]  S. Bricogne,et al.  Neural Correlates of Topographic Mental Exploration: The Impact of Route versus Survey Perspective Learning , 2000, NeuroImage.

[30]  E. Maguire,et al.  Knowing Where Things Are: Parahippocampal Involvement in Encoding Object Locations in Virtual Large-Scale Space , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  R. Passingham,et al.  Brain Mechanisms for Inferring Deceit in the Actions of Others , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  S. Zeki,et al.  The Encoding of Temporally Irregular and Regular Visual Patterns in the Human Brain , 2008, PloS one.

[34]  D. Berlyne Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[35]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Greicius,et al.  Humor Modulates the Mesolimbic Reward Centers , 2003, Neuron.

[37]  Soon Chun Siong,et al.  Cortical Areas Involved in Object, Background, and Object-Background Processing Revealed with Functional Magnetic Resonance Adaptation , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[39]  M. Bar,et al.  Cortical Analysis of Visual Context , 2003, Neuron.

[40]  Moshe Bar,et al.  Integrated Contextual Representation for Objects' Identities and Their Locations , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Bar,et al.  The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  A. Damasio,et al.  A neural basis for lexical retrieval , 1996, Nature.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Brain Mechanisms for Detecting Perceptual, Semantic, and Emotional Deviance , 2000, NeuroImage.

[44]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  R. Knight,et al.  Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3 , 1989, Brain Research.

[46]  E. Rolls,et al.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  A. Friedman Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  I. Olson,et al.  The Enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[50]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[51]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics , 1975 .

[52]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Evaluation: fMRI Correlates of Valence, Emotional Intensity, and Control in the Processing of Attitudes , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty , 2006, NeuroImage.

[54]  R. Benson,et al.  Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  P M Grasby,et al.  Brain systems for encoding and retrieval of auditory-verbal memory. An in vivo study in humans. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Prefrontal Activation Evoked by Infrequent Target and Novel Stimuli in a Visual Target Detection Task: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[58]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[59]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[60]  Ethan M. Meyers,et al.  Contextually Evoked Object-Specific Responses in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Science.

[61]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[62]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.