Degree of satisfaction in agent negotiation

Agent negotiation over multiple issues is often seen as the process of searching for a solution in a complex and large space. Depending on the negotiation mechanism such search space can be dynamic wherein agents may be cooperative or non-cooperative. In a realistic negotiation, agents are unwilling to reveal their utility functions to their opponents or collaborators. These important characteristics of negotiation increase the complexity of the design of efficient and effective negotiation agents. We propose an approach that combines a co-evolutionary mechanism with the notion of degree of satisfaction. The former effectively searches the space, while the latter improves negotiation efficiency. Agents under the proposed scheme can carry out cooperative, or non-cooperative, without revealing their utility functions. The proposed approach is implemented as a prototype system and evaluated through a number of experiments. The evaluation shows the effectiveness of the proposed approach in cooperation and non-cooperation.

[1]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein and Gilad Zlotkin Rules of Encounter , 1994 .

[2]  Kuo-Ming Chao,et al.  Architecture of an agent-based negotiation mechanism , 2002, Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.

[3]  Kuo-Ming Chao,et al.  A mobile agent framework for telecardiology , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Peter Smith,et al.  An automated negotiation mechanism based on co-evolution and game theory , 2002, SAC '02.

[5]  Von-Wun Soo,et al.  Agent negotiation in trusted third party mediated uncertain games , 2000, AGENTS '00.

[6]  N. R. Jennings,et al.  To appear in: Int Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation GDN2000 Keynote Paper Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges , 2022 .

[7]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Determining successful negotiation strategies: an evolutionary approach , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[8]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Reaching Agreements Through Argumentation: A Logical Model and Implementation , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Kuo-Ming Chao,et al.  Negotiating Agents in a Market-Oriented Grid , 2002, 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID'02).

[10]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Argumentation-based negotiation , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[11]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agents That Reason and Negotiate by Arguing , 1998, J. Log. Comput..

[12]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Mechanisms for Automated Negotiation in State Oriented Domains , 1996, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[13]  Peyman Faratin,et al.  Automated service negotiation between autonomous computational agents , 2000 .

[14]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Negotiation and Cooperation in Multi-Agent Environments , 1997, Artif. Intell..