Information Sharing as a Dimension of Smartness: Understanding Benefits and Challenges in Two Megacities

Cities around the world are facing increasingly complex problems. These problems frequently require collaboration and information sharing across agency boundaries. In our view, information sharing can be seen as an important dimension of what is recently being called smartness in cities and enables the ability to improve decision making and day-to-day operations in urban settings. Unfortunately, what many city managers are learning is that there are important challenges to sharing information both within their city and with others. Based on nonemergency service integration initiatives in New York City and Mexico City, this article examines important benefits from and challenges to information sharing in the context of what the participants characterize as smart city initiatives, particularly in large metropolitan areas. The research question guiding this study is as follows: To what extent do previous findings about information sharing hold in the context of city initiatives, particularly in megacities? The results provide evidence on the importance of some specific characteristics of cities and megalopolises and how they affect benefits and challenges of information sharing. For instance, cities seem to have more managerial flexibility than other jurisdictions such as state governments. In addition, megalopolises have most of the necessary technical skills and financial resources needed for information sharing and, therefore, these challenges are not as relevant as in other local governments.

[1]  M. Z. Babai,et al.  Reduction of the value of information sharing as demand becomes strongly auto-correlated , 2016 .

[2]  Daniel Tumminelli O'Brien,et al.  Using small data to interpret big data: 311 reports as individual contributions to informal social control in urban neighborhoods. , 2016, Social science research.

[3]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  B. Head Toward More “Evidence-Informed” Policy Making? , 2016 .

[5]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Information Shocks and the Take‐Up of Social Programs , 2015 .

[6]  M. Angelidou Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces , 2015 .

[7]  D. O’Brien,et al.  Custodians and Custodianship in Urban Neighborhoods , 2015 .

[8]  Dietmar Offenhuber Infrastructure legibility—a comparative analysis of open311-based citizen feedback systems , 2015 .

[9]  Pamela A. Mischen Collaborative Network Capacity , 2015 .

[10]  David Valle Cruz,et al.  Social Media in Smart Cities: An Exploratory Research in Mexican Municipalities , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Eric Gordon,et al.  Caring about the community, counteracting disorder: 311 reports of public issues as expressions of territoriality , 2014 .

[12]  Maria Guillermina Cledou A virtual factory for smart city service integration , 2014, ICEGOV.

[13]  Sara Cavallo,et al.  The Digital Divide in Citizen-Initiated Government Contacts: A GIS Approach , 2014 .

[14]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  How is information shared across the boundaries of government agencies? An e-Government case study , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Laurie A. Schintler,et al.  Big Data for Policy Analysis: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly , 2014 .

[16]  Jie Lu,et al.  Knowledge-based life event model for e-government service integration with illustrative examples , 2014, Intell. Decis. Technol..

[17]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[18]  M. Hoyler,et al.  Governing the new metropolis , 2014 .

[19]  Giuseppe Piro,et al.  Information centric services in Smart Cities , 2014, J. Syst. Softw..

[20]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: A social exchange perspective , 2014 .

[21]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Understanding Municipal Service Integration: An Exploratory Study of 311 Contact Centers , 2014 .

[22]  V. Žabkar,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Reputation and Information Sharing on Value Creation for Organizational Customers , 2013 .

[23]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Smart city initiatives and the policy context: the case of the rapid business opening office in Mexico City , 2013, International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.

[24]  M. Esteve,et al.  Organizational Collaboration in the Public Sector: Do Chief Executives Make a Difference? , 2013 .

[25]  Muhammad Mustafa Kamal,et al.  Electronic information sharing in local government authorities: Factors influencing the decision-making process , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Jeffrey L. Brudney,et al.  Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology: Investigating the Distributional Biases , 2013 .

[27]  木下 貴博,et al.  簿記教育におけるICT (information and communication technologies)の活用 , 2013 .

[28]  D. Evers,et al.  Explaining Governance in Five Mega-City Regions: Rethinking the Role of Hierarchy and Government , 2013 .

[29]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Integrating ICT into the planning process: impacts, opportunities and challenges , 2013 .

[30]  Chang Gyu Choi,et al.  Metropolitan growth and community disparities: Insights from the state of New Jersey in the US , 2013 .

[31]  T. Entwistle,et al.  Four Faces of Public Service Efficiency , 2013 .

[32]  Erk P. Piening Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations , 2013 .

[33]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Aspirations and realizations: The smart city of Seattle , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Social Capital, Management Capacity and Public Service Performance , 2013 .

[35]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Towards a smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[36]  Torsten Oliver Salge,et al.  Benefiting from Public Sector Innovation : the Moderating Role of Customer and Learning Orientation , 2012 .

[37]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[38]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context , 2011, ICEGOV '11.

[39]  Liu Wen-jing,et al.  Government information sharing: Principles, practice, and problems - An international perspective , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[40]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  First steps towards studying government information sharing and integration in metropolitan areas , 2011, dg.o '11.

[41]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[42]  Karol Furdík,et al.  Integration of Government Services using Semantic Technologies , 2011, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[43]  J. Pierre,et al.  Exploring the Strategic Region: Rationality, Context, and Institutional Collective Action , 2010 .

[44]  Richard C. Feiock,et al.  Collaboration Networks Among Local Elected Officials: Information, Commitment, and Risk Aversion , 2010 .

[45]  Martin Johnson,et al.  Local News Outlets and Political Participation , 2010 .

[46]  L. Frasure,et al.  The Logic of Institutional Interdependency: The Case of Day Laborer Policy in Suburbia , 2010 .

[47]  S. Erie,et al.  Redevelopment, San Diego Style: The Limits of Public—Private Partnerships , 2010 .

[48]  Jie Lu,et al.  Life-event modelling framework for e-government integration , 2010, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[49]  R. Hays The Evolution of Citizenship in a Divided Urban Community , 2010 .

[50]  John P. Pelissero,et al.  Urban Managers and Public Policy , 2010 .

[51]  E. Lawrence,et al.  Crafting Urban Policy , 2010 .

[52]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical , 2009, Inf. Polity.

[53]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  An Ontology for Modeling Life-Events , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007).

[54]  K. Mossberger,et al.  Building Blocks for a Methodology for Comparative Urban Political Research , 2006 .

[55]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  Learning about Interoperability for Emergency Response: Geographic Information Technologies and the World Trade Center Crisis , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[56]  J. Pierre Comparative Urban Governance , 2005 .

[57]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[58]  David Landsbergen,et al.  Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology , 2001 .

[59]  S. Dawes Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks , 1996 .

[60]  Robert Agranoff,et al.  Human Services Integration: Past and Present Challenges in Public Administration , 1991 .

[61]  R. Yin The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers , 1981 .

[62]  Government Information , 2019, Washington Information Directory 2019–2020.

[63]  Ulrik Hvidman,et al.  Perceptions of Public and Private Performance: Evidence from a Survey Experiment , 2016 .

[64]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization , 2015, Inf. Polity.

[65]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  The role of IT-enabled collaborative decision making in inter-organizational information integration to improve customer service performance , 2015 .

[66]  C. Adams,et al.  Public Service Integration in Jordan , 2015 .

[67]  Guido Perboli,et al.  A New Taxonomy of Smart City Projects , 2014 .

[68]  Chung-Pin Lee,et al.  E-government Use and Citizen Empowerment: Examining the effects of online information on political efficacy , 2014 .

[69]  Theo Tryfonas,et al.  Living Labs, Innovation Districts and Information Marketplaces: A Systems Approach for Smart Cities , 2013, CSER.

[70]  A. Panter,et al.  APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. , 2012 .

[71]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Exploring 311-Driven Changes in City Government , 2012, AMCIS.

[72]  Pieter Verdegem,et al.  The challenge of technolgy: alignment dynamics in local governments , 2012 .

[73]  J. Chamie,et al.  World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision , 2004 .

[74]  M. Manen Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy , 1990 .

[75]  L. Heidgerken [Case study methods]. , 1968, Sykepleien.