Working memory capacity and categorization: individual differences and modeling.

Working memory is crucial for many higher-level cognitive functions, ranging from mental arithmetic to reasoning and problem solving. Likewise, the ability to learn and categorize novel concepts forms an indispensable part of human cognition. However, very little is known about the relationship between working memory and categorization, and modeling in category learning has thus far been largely uninformed by knowledge about people's memory processes. This article reports a large study (N = 113) that related people's working memory capacity (WMC) to their category-learning performance using the 6 problem types of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Structural equation modeling revealed a strong relationship between WMC and category learning, with a single latent variable accommodating performance on all 6 problems. A model of categorization (the Attention Learning COVEring map, ALCOVE; Kruschke, 1992) was fit to the individual data and a single latent variable was sufficient to capture the variation among associative learning parameters across all problems. The data and modeling suggest that working memory mediates category learning across a broad range of tasks.

[1]  R. Shepard,et al.  Learning and memorization of classifications. , 1961 .

[2]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[3]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[4]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[5]  R. Nosofsky American Psychological Association, Inc. Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification , 2022 .

[6]  R. Nosofsky Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. , 1984 .

[7]  Bobby Schnabel,et al.  A modular system of algorithms for unconstrained minimization , 1985, TOMS.

[8]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  M A Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .

[11]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! , 1990 .

[12]  M. Gluck Stimulus Generalization and Representation in Adaptive Network Models of Category Learning , 1991 .

[13]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Principles for creating a computerized test battery , 1991 .

[14]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[15]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization , 1993 .

[16]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Influence of working memory on adult age differences in matrix reasoning. , 1993, British journal of psychology.

[17]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Comparing modes of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[18]  William K. Estes,et al.  Classification and cognition , 1994 .

[19]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. , 1994, Psychological review.

[20]  S. Lewandowsky Base-rate neglect in ALCOVE: A critical reevaluation. , 1995 .

[21]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Learning to classify integral-dimension stimuli , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Using Parameter Sensitivity and Interdependence to Predict Model Scope and Falsifiability , 1996 .

[23]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. , 1998, Psychological review.

[26]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop as a language learning device. , 1998, Psychological review.

[27]  J. Kruschke,et al.  Rules and exemplars in category learning. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  J. Kruschke,et al.  A model of probabilistic category learning. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct , 2000 .

[31]  Mark K. Johansen,et al.  Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  F. Ashby,et al.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systems , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Shawn W. Ell,et al.  The neurobiology of human category learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  J. Kruschke,et al.  Multiple Representations in Inductive Category Learning: Evidence of Stimulus- and Time-Dependent Re , 2001 .

[36]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A hybrid model of categorization , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  G. Baylis,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Mark K. Johansen,et al.  Are there representational shifts during category learning? , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Single-system models and interference in category learning: Commentary on Waldron and Ashby (2001) , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  B. Love Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Tom Verguts,et al.  On the correlation between working memory capacity and performance on intelligence tests , 2002 .

[43]  Robert M Nosofsky,et al.  Categorization and recognition performance of a memory-impaired group: Evidence for single-system models , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[44]  Dirk van Rijn,et al.  Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2003 .

[45]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination , 2003 .

[46]  Shawn W. Ell,et al.  Procedural learning in perceptual categorization , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[47]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Context-gated knowledge partitioning in categorization. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Knowledge partitioning in categorization: constraints on exemplar models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  R. Engle,et al.  Corresponding author. , 2004 .

[50]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[51]  W Todd Maddox,et al.  Category number impacts rule-based but not information-integration category learning: further evidence for dissociable category-learning systems. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  Fabien Mathy,et al.  A theory of the graceful complexification of concepts and their learnability , 2004 .

[53]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  R. Engle,et al.  Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between Operation Span and Raven , 2005 .

[55]  K. Oberauer Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  A. Tomarken,et al.  Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. , 2005, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[57]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  An automated version of the operation span task , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[59]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[60]  F. Ashby,et al.  Category learning and multiple memory systems , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  J. Kruschke,et al.  Eye gaze and individual differences consistent with learned attention in associative blocking and highlighting. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  M. Lee,et al.  Modeling individual differences in cognition , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Category representation for classification and feature inference. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Delayed feedback disrupts the procedural-learning system but not the hypothesis-testing system in perceptual category learning. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[65]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Knowledge partitioning in categorization: Boundary conditions , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[66]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[67]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Why are reasoning ability and working memory capacity related to mental speed? An investigation of stimulus–response compatibility in choice reaction time tasks , 2006 .

[68]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Modeling individual differences using Dirichlet processes , 2006 .

[69]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  A more rational model of categorization , 2006 .

[70]  D. Luce,et al.  Detection and Recognition " ' , 2006 .

[71]  Darrell A. Worthy,et al.  Choking and Excelling Under Pressure , 2006, Psychological science.

[72]  Ronaldo Vigo,et al.  A note on the complexity of Boolean concepts , 2006 .

[73]  R. Engle,et al.  Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention". , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  R Sun,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2006 .

[75]  J. Feldman An algebra of human concept learning , 2006 .

[76]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  A temporal ratio model of memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[77]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  The role of visuospatial and verbal working memory in perceptual category learning , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[78]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and reasoning ability , 2007 .

[79]  Guy W. Mineau,et al.  Complexity minimization in rule-based category learning: Revising the catalog of Boolean concepts and evidence for non-minimal rules , 2007 .

[80]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[81]  N. Cowan,et al.  Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[82]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[83]  D. Lagnado,et al.  Challenging the role of implicit processes in probabilistic category learning , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[84]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[85]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  Effects of incentive on working memory capacity: behavioral and pupillometric data. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[86]  V. Sloutsky,et al.  What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[87]  M. A. Erickson,et al.  Executive attention and task switching in category learning: Evidence for stimulus-dependent representation , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[88]  Brian D. Glass,et al.  When more is less: Feedback effects in perceptual category learning , 2008, Cognition.

[89]  John Paul Minda,et al.  Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[90]  Adam N. Sanborn,et al.  Model evaluation using grouped or individual data , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[91]  Fabien Mathy,et al.  Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use , 2008, Psychological research.

[92]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in working memory , 2008 .

[93]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Category learning and the memory systems debate , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[94]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more , 2008, Cognition.

[95]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  When and how less is more: reply to Tharp and Pickering , 2009, Cognition.

[96]  A. Pickering,et al.  A note on DeCaro, Thomas, and Beilock (2008): Further data demonstrate complexities in the assessment of information–integration category learning , 2009, Cognition.

[97]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Associative learning predicts intelligence above and beyond working memory and processing speed , 2009 .

[98]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Design for a working memory. , 2009 .

[99]  Marcus R. Watson,et al.  The impact of category type and working memory span on attentional learning in categorization , 2009 .

[100]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[101]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[102]  M. Kalish,et al.  The dimensionality of perceptual category learning: A state-trace analysis , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[103]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  A working memory test battery for MATLAB , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[104]  M. Kalish,et al.  Systems of Category Learning: Fact or Fantasy? , 2011 .

[105]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Restructuring partitioned knowledge: The role of recoordination in category learning , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[106]  David K. Sewell,et al.  Attention and working memory capacity: insights from blocking, highlighting, and knowledge restructuring. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[107]  C. Stein,et al.  Structural equation modeling. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[108]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Variation in Working Memory Capacity as Variation in Executive Attention and Control , 2012 .