Belief Systems and Social Capital as Drivers of Policy Network Structure: The Case of California Regional Planning

This article uses exponential random graph models to investigate the roles of policy-relevant beliefs and social capital as drivers of network structure. The advocacy coalition framework argues that actors with similar policy beliefs are more likely to form coalitions, leading to policy subsystems fragmented into ideological groups. Social capital is defined as trust and norms of reciprocity, which helps cement cooperative relationships. Hypotheses are tested using survey data of policy elites involved in land-use and transportation planning in four regions of California. The findings suggest that coalitions of actors with similar belief systems are knit together by policy brokers seeking to build transitive social relationships.

[1]  Douglas Steinley,et al.  K-means clustering: a half-century synthesis. , 2006, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[2]  E. Bardach.  The implementation game , 1977 .

[3]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[4]  Eugene Bardach,et al.  Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship , 1998 .

[5]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework , 1995 .

[6]  J. Innes.  Selective Exposure as a Function of Dogmatism and Incentive. , 1978, The Journal of social psychology.

[7]  Martina Morris,et al.  Advances in exponential random graph (p*) models , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[8]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Evolutionary cycles of cooperation and defection. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Fowler.  Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks , 2006, Political Analysis.

[10]  M. Nowak,et al.  Chaos and the evolution of cooperation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Christopher M. Weible,et al.  An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy , 2006 .

[12]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[13]  John T. Scholz,et al.  Self‐Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries , 2010 .

[14]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[15]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Manual for SIENA version 2.1 , 2005 .

[16]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Biased Assimilation of Sociopolitical Arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. Presidential Debate , 2002 .

[17]  C. Weible,et al.  The Advocacy Coalition Framework , 2012, Theories of the Policy Process.

[18]  Garry Robins,et al.  An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[19]  Larissa Larsen,et al.  Bonding and Bridging , 2004 .

[20]  M. Lubell,et al.  Collaborative Institutions in an Ecology of Games , 2010 .

[21]  M. Peffley,et al.  How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[22]  David Marsh,et al.  Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach , 2000 .

[23]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[24]  M. Thatcher,et al.  The Development of Policy Network Analyses , 1998 .

[25]  D. Steinley.  Profiling local optima in K-means clustering: developing a diagnostic technique. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[26]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[27]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[28]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents , 1987 .

[29]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[30]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Comparing Policy Networks: Marine Protected Areas in California , 2005 .

[31]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[32]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. , 1990 .

[33]  T. Wan.  Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables , 2002 .

[34]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Heider vs Simmel: Emergent Features in Dynamic Structures , 2006, SNA@ICML.

[35]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks , 1996 .

[36]  P. Ditto,et al.  Biased Assimilation, Attitude Polarization, and Affect in Reactions to Stereotype-Relevant Scientific Information , 1997 .

[37]  Peng Wang,et al.  Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[38]  N. Lin.  Buidling a Network Theory of Social Capital , 1999, Connections.

[39]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[40]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[41]  M. Rokeach,et al.  Understanding Human Values: Individual and Societal , 1979 .

[42]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[43]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program , 2003 .

[44]  Christopher M. Weible,et al.  Beliefs and Perceived Influence in a Natural Resource Conflict: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Networks , 2005 .

[45]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Power and influence in organizations , 1998 .

[46]  A. King,et al.  The New American Political System. , 1980 .

[47]  E. Rasmussen.  Games and Information , 1989 .

[48]  D. Krackhardt.  Simmelian Ties: Super Strong and Sticky , 1998 .

[49]  G. Simmel.  The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[50]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[51]  Cun-Quan Zhang,et al.  A new multimembership clustering method , 2007 .

[52]  J. C. Dunn,et al.  A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters , 1973 .

[53]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[54]  E. Ostrom.  A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[55]  J. Pretty.  Social Capital and the Collective Management of Resources , 2003, Science.

[56]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources , 1994 .