Heads or Tails? Cranio-Caudal Mass Distribution for Robust Locomotion with Biorobotic Appendages Composed of 3D-Printed Soft Materials

The addition of external mass onto an organism can be used to examine the salient features of inherent locomotion dynamics. In this biorobotics study general principles of systems in motion are explored experimentally to gain insight on observed biodiversity in body plans and prevalent cranio-caudal mass distributions. Head and tail mass can make up approximately 20% of total body mass in lizards. To focus on the effect of differential loading of the ‘head’ and the ‘tail’ we designed an experiment using weights of 10% total body mass connected to the front and rear at varying distances to simulate biological mass distribution. Additive manufacturing techniques with compliant materials were utilized to make the biomimetic limbs. Obstacle traversal performance was evaluated over 126 trials in a variety of Moment of Inertia (MOI) configurations, recording pitch angles. Results showed that a forward-biased MOI appears useful for regaining contact in the front wheels during obstacle negotiation, while large passive tails can have a destabilising effect in some configurations. In our robophysical model, we explore both wheeled and legged locomotion (‘whegs’), and additionally examine damping the motion of the chassis by utilizing soft non-pneumatic tires (‘tweels’) which reduce body oscillations that arise from locomotion on irregular terrain.

[1]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot , 2008 .

[2]  A. Ijspeert,et al.  From Swimming to Walking with a Salamander Robot Driven by a Spinal Cord Model , 2007, Science.

[3]  D. G. Chapple,et al.  Effect of caudal autotomy on locomotor performance in a viviparous skink, Niveoscincus metallicus , 2002 .

[4]  X. Ji,et al.  Energetic and locomotor costs of tail loss in the Chinese skink, Eumeces chinensis. , 2006, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[5]  C. Daniels,et al.  Tail size and effectiveness of autotomy in a lizard , 1986 .

[6]  Simon Sponberg,et al.  The emergent physics of animal locomotion , 2017 .

[7]  J. Willey,et al.  The tale of the tail: limb function and locomotor mechanics in Alligator mississippiensis , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  T. Dawson,et al.  Energetics and biomechanics of locomotion by red kangaroos (Macropus rufus). , 1998, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[9]  D. H. Taylor,et al.  Home Range Ecology of an Introduced Population of the European Wall Lizard Podarcis muralis (Lacertilia; Lacertidae) in Cincinnati, Ohio , 1995 .

[10]  G. Mitchell,et al.  HOW GIRAFFE ADAPT TO THEIR EXTRAORDINARY SHAPE , 1993 .

[11]  Richard L Essner Three-dimensional launch kinematics in leaping, parachuting and gliding squirrels. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  D R Carrier,et al.  Influence of rotational inertia on turning performance of theropod dinosaurs: clues from humans with increased rotational inertia. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Chen Li,et al.  A Terradynamics of Legged Locomotion on Granular Media , 2013, Science.

[15]  Timothy E Higham,et al.  Lateral movements of a massive tail influence gecko locomotion: an integrative study comparing tail restriction and autotomy , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Justin E. Seipel,et al.  Energy Efficiency of Legged Robot Locomotion With Elastically Suspended Loads , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  R. Full,et al.  Active tails enhance arboreal acrobatics in geckos , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  R J Full,et al.  Distributed mechanical feedback in arthropods and robots simplifies control of rapid running on challenging terrain , 2007, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[19]  A. Gentry,et al.  Tropical Forest Structure and the Distribution of Gliding and Prehensile-Tailed Vertebrates , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Jing-Shan Zhao,et al.  Identification of avian flapping motion from non-volant winged dinosaurs based on modal effective mass analysis , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Energetic Cost of Locomotion in Kangaroos , 1973, Nature.

[22]  R. Full,et al.  Tail-assisted pitch control in lizards, robots and dinosaurs , 2012, Nature.

[23]  D. Tinkle,et al.  On the Cost of Tail Regeneration to Body Growth in Lizards , 1979 .

[24]  José Martín,et al.  Effects of tail loss on the movement patterns of the lizard, Psammodromus algirus , 1998 .

[25]  J V Warren,et al.  The physiology of the giraffe. , 1974, Scientific American.

[26]  Robert J Full,et al.  Aerial righting reflexes in flightless animals. , 2011, Integrative and comparative biology.

[27]  A Jusufi,et al.  Righting and turning in mid-air using appendage inertia: reptile tails, analytical models and bio-inspired robots , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[28]  Auke J. Ijspeert,et al.  Biorobotics: Using robots to emulate and investigate agile locomotion , 2014, Science.

[29]  T. Higham,et al.  Consequences of lost endings: caudal autotomy as a lens for focusing attention on tail function during locomotion , 2016, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[30]  M. Braae,et al.  Rapid turning at high-speed: Inspirations from the cheetah's tail , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[31]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  The locomotor kinematics and ground reaction forces of walking giraffes , 2019, Journal of Experimental Biology.