Similarity, Typicality, and Category-Level Matching of Morphed Outlines of Everyday Objects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .
[2] M. Tarr,et al. Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? , 1998, Cognition.
[3] R. Vogels,et al. Effects of Category Learning on the Stimulus Selectivity of Macaque References , 2022 .
[4] Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.
[5] R. Nosofsky,et al. An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.
[6] R. Nosofsky,et al. Central Tendencies, Extreme Points, and Prototype Enhancement Effects in Ill-Defined Perceptual Categorization , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[7] D. Gentner,et al. Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[8] Shimon Edelman,et al. The interaction of shape- and location-based priming in object categorisation: Evidence for a hybrid “what+where” representation stage , 2005, Vision Research.
[9] Johan Wagemans,et al. Contour-based object identification and segmentation: Stimuli, norms and data, and software tools , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[10] Markus Graf,et al. Coordinate transformations in object recognition. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.
[11] N. Chater,et al. Similarity as transformation , 2003, Cognition.
[12] C. Eriksen,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .
[13] Johan Wagemans,et al. Visual Object Categorisation at Distinct Levels of Abstraction: A New Stimulus Set , 2001, Perception.
[14] I. Rybak,et al. A model of attention-guided visual perception and recognition , 1998, Vision Research.
[15] Kenji Kawano,et al. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex , 1999, Nature.
[16] K. Lamberts. Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. , 2000, Psychological review.
[17] R. Vogels,et al. The representation of perceived shape similarity and its role for category learning in monkeys: A modeling study , 2008, Vision Research.
[18] M. Bar. A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[19] C. Bundesen,et al. Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[20] S Edelman,et al. Representation is representation of similarities , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[21] I. Gauthier,et al. Visual object understanding , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[22] Johan Wagemans,et al. Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Fragmented Outline Versions , 2008, Perception.
[23] P. Schyns,et al. Categories and percepts: a bi-directionnal framework for categorization , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[24] Z. A. Trapeznikova. On the Interaction of , 1959 .
[25] J. B. Pittenger,et al. Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[26] J. Todd,et al. Describing perceptual information about human growth in terms of geometric invariants , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[27] David L. Sheinberg,et al. Activity of Inferior Temporal Cortical Neurons Predicts Recognition Choice Behavior and Recognition Time during Visual Search , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[28] P. Schyns,et al. Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .
[29] R. Shepard,et al. Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .
[30] Koen Lamberts. Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. , 2000 .
[31] Markus Graf. Form, Space and Object: Geometrical Transformations in Object Recognition and Categorization , 2002 .
[32] Alex Martin,et al. Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[33] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. Priming and Multiple Memory Systems: Perceptual Mechanisms of Implicit Memory , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[34] Philippe G Schyns,et al. Diagnostic recognition: task constraints, object information, and their interactions , 1998, Cognition.
[35] R N Henson,et al. Mechanisms of top-down facilitation in perception of visual objects studied by FMRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.
[36] Safa R. Zaki,et al. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[37] Anitha Pasupathy,et al. Transformation of shape information in the ventral pathway , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[38] R. Vogels,et al. Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.
[39] Drew H. Abney,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .
[40] I. Gauthier,et al. Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[41] Claus Bundesen,et al. Visual pattern matching: Effects of size ratio, complexity, and similarity in simultaneous and successive matching , 1999 .
[42] F. Tong,et al. The timing of perceptual decisions for ambiguous face stimuli in the human ventral visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.
[43] Johan Wagemans,et al. Shape equivalence under perspective and projective transformations , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[44] C Bundesen,et al. Visual Apparent Movement: Transformations of Size and Orientation , 1983, Perception.
[45] S. Hochstein,et al. View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.
[46] L. Gool,et al. Minimal information to determine affine shape equivalence. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[47] R. Henson,et al. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[48] Johan Wagemans,et al. The Visual System's Measurement of Invariants Need Not Itself Be Invariant , 1996 .
[49] J. Wagemans,et al. Mental rotation versus invariant features in object perception from different viewpoints: an fMRI study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[50] Peter König,et al. Invariant representations of visual patterns in a temporal population code , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[51] G W Humphreys,et al. The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: one manipulation or two? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[52] W. Newsome,et al. A general mechanism for decision-making in the human brain? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[53] Michael C Mozer,et al. Frames of reference in unilateral neglect and visual perception: a computational perspective. , 2002, Psychological review.
[54] R. Romo,et al. Temporal Evolution of a Decision-Making Process in Medial Premotor Cortex , 2002, Neuron.
[55] M. Tarr. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[56] Lin Chen. The topological approach to perceptual organization , 2005 .
[57] P. Schyns,et al. Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .
[58] Johan Wagemans,et al. Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Silhouette and Outline Versions , 2007, Perception.
[59] R. Vogels,et al. Properties of shape tuning of macaque inferior temporal neurons examined using rapid serial visual presentation. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.
[60] J. Wagemans,et al. Low-level correlations between object properties and viewpoint can cause viewpoint-dependent object recognition. , 2007, Spatial vision.
[61] Nathan Intrator,et al. (coarse Coding of Shape Fragments) (retinotopy) Representation of Structure , 2000 .
[62] Thomas F Münte,et al. Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[63] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[64] J. Kruschke,et al. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.
[65] Safa R. Zaki,et al. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[66] H H Bülthoff,et al. Orientation Congruency Effects for Familiar Objects , 2005, Psychological science.
[67] H T Kukkonen,et al. Qualitative Cues in the Discrimination of Affine-Transformed Minimal Patterns , 1996, Perception.
[68] Shimon Edelman,et al. Representation and recognition in vision , 1999 .
[69] S. Kosslyn,et al. Varieties of size-specific visual selection. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[70] J Wagemans,et al. Matching multicomponent objects from different viewpoints: mental rotation as normalization? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[71] David D. Cox,et al. Untangling invariant object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[72] I. Biederman,et al. Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.
[73] E. Halgren,et al. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[74] R M Nosofsky,et al. Comparing exemplar-retrieval and decision-bound models of speeded perceptual classification , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.
[75] R M Nosofsky,et al. An exemplar-retrieval model of speeded same--different judgments. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[76] S. Ullman. Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views , 1998, Cognition.
[77] Douglas L. Medin,et al. Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .
[78] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[79] J. O'Regan,et al. Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.
[80] E. Rosch,et al. Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .
[81] R. Nosofsky. Exemplar-Based Accounts of Relations Between Classification, Recognition, and Typicality , 1988 .
[82] J T Todd,et al. Perception of growth: a geometric analysis of how different styles of change are distinguished. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[83] Manila Vannucci,et al. Category Effects on the Processing of Plane-Rotated Objects , 2000, Perception.
[84] S. Ullman. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.
[85] D. Gentner,et al. Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity , 1993 .
[86] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Continuous Dynamics in Real-Time Cognition , 2006 .
[87] L Chen,et al. Topological Structure in the Perception of Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.
[88] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[89] B Willems,et al. Multiple Routes to Object Matching from Different Viewpoints: Mental Rotation versus Invariant Features , 2001, Perception.
[90] John Lisman,et al. Recognition by top-down and bottom-up processing in cortex: the control of selective attention. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.
[91] Ramesh C. Jain,et al. Three-dimensional object recognition , 1985, CSUR.
[92] Johan Wagemans,et al. Asymmetries in Stimulus Comparisons by Monkey and Man , 2003, Current Biology.
[93] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain , 2004, Nature.
[94] Elan Barenholtz,et al. Visual judgment of similarity across shape transformations: evidence for a compositional model of articulated objects. , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[95] J T Todd,et al. Perception of growth from changes in body proportions. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[96] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.
[97] J T Todd,et al. On the Relative Salience of Euclidean, Affine, and Topological Structure for 3-D Form Discrimination , 1998, Perception.
[98] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[99] P. Jolicoeur,et al. Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[100] J. Wagemans,et al. The Representation of Shape in the Context of Visual Object Categorization Tasks , 2000, NeuroImage.
[101] D. Perrett,et al. Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.
[102] Wolfgang Spohn,et al. The Representation of , 1986 .
[103] Markus Graf,et al. Categorization and Object Shape , 2010 .
[104] Johan Wagemans,et al. The representation of subordinate shape similarity in human occipitotemporal cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[105] James T. Enns,et al. Clusters Precede Shapes in Perceptual Organization , 1997 .
[106] J. D. Smith,et al. Journey to the center of the category: the dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[107] I. Gauthier,et al. Visual Neurons: Categorization-Based Selectivity , 2002, Current Biology.
[108] C W Eriksen,et al. Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.
[109] M. Tarr,et al. Orientation Priming of Novel Shapes in the Context of Viewpoint-Dependent Recognition , 1997, Perception.
[110] S. Kosslyn,et al. Varieties of size-specific visual selection. , 1989 .
[111] Johan Wagemans,et al. Subordinate Categorization Enhances the Neural Selectivity in Human Object-selective Cortex for Fine Shape Differences , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[112] B. Schölkopf,et al. Generalization and similarity in exemplar models of categorization: Insights from machine learning , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[113] J Wagemans,et al. Invariance from the Euclidean Geometer's Perspective , 1994, Perception.
[114] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[115] Tomaso Poggio,et al. Generalization in vision and motor control , 2004, Nature.
[116] R Lawson,et al. Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. , 1999, Acta psychologica.
[117] Johan Wagemans,et al. Time-course contingencies in perceptual organization and identification of fragmented object outlines. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[118] T. Sejnowski,et al. Book Review: Gain Modulation in the Central Nervous System: Where Behavior, Neurophysiology, and Computation Meet , 2001, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.
[119] Shimon Edelman,et al. Representation of similarity as a goal of early visual processing , 1995 .
[120] R. Vogels. Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single‐cell study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.