Seeing how it’s done: matching conditions for observer rats (Rattus norvegicus) in the bidirectional control

Abstract In an attempt to increase the reliability of the demonstrator-consistent responding effect produced in the bidirectional control procedure, experiments 1–4 sought conditions that would magnify the matching effect. The aim was to produce a robust demonstrator-consistent responding effect in order that future analytic experiments could investigate the psychological processes responsible for this effect. The joystick responses of observer rats trained using the standard bidirectional control procedure parameters were compared with those of observers subject to conditions identified in the social learning literature as favourable for imitation. Unlike mice, observer rats in experiments 1 a and 1 b tended to push a joystick in the same direction as their demonstrators when the demonstrators were either familiar or unfamiliar males and females. Comparable demonstrator-consistent responding occurred following observation of a standard and a salient joystick response (experiment 2). Experiment 3 showed that the discriminative accuracy of a demonstrator’s responding was important for matching behaviour, and suggested that matching might be enhanced with more than the conventional single observation session. Experiment 4 confirmed that the bidirectional control effect is sensitive to the amount of observational experience; after six observation sessions, demonstrator-inconsistent responding occurs. The results of experiments 1–3 are, and those of experiment 4 are not, compatible with the hypothesis that demonstrator-consistent responding in the bidirectional control is caused by olfactory cues deposited by demonstrators on the joystick.

[1]  A. Whiten,et al.  Can Young Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes) Imitate Arbitrary Actions? Hayes & Hayes (1952) Revisited , 1995 .

[2]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Effects of the knowledge of partners on learning rates in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Richard W. Byrnl,et al.  Do rats ape? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Gardner Mr,et al.  Imitation : the methodological adequacy of directional control tests. , 1997 .

[5]  G. Biederman,et al.  Observational learning in pigeons: The function of quality of observed performance in simultaneous discrimination ☆ , 1988 .

[6]  R. Collins.  Observational learning of a left-right behavioral asymmetry in mice (Mus musculus). , 1988, Journal of comparative psychology.

[7]  Louis Lefebvre,et al.  Carib Grackles Imitate Conspecific and Zenaida Dove Tutors , 1997 .

[8]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[9]  C. Heyes,et al.  Imitation in Rats: Initial Responding and Transfer Evidence , 1992 .

[10]  C. Heyes,et al.  Limitations of a Bidirectional Control Procedure for the Investigation of Imitation in Rats: Odour Cues on the Manipulandum , 1999 .

[11]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Early Imitation Within a Functional Framework: The Importance of Person Identity, Movement, and Development. , 1992, Infant behavior & development.

[12]  C. Heyes,et al.  A Demonstration of Observational Learning in Rats using a Bidirectional Control , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  G. Dawson,et al.  Observational extinction: Observation of nonreinforced responding reduces resistance to extinction in rats , 1993 .

[14]  Marina Vanayan,et al.  Observational Learning in Pigeons: The effects of Model Proficiency on Observer Performance , 1985 .

[15]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  Push or pull: an experimental study on imitation in marmosets , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Effects of Model and Action on Imitation in Infancy. , 1983 .

[17]  Geoffrey Hall.  Perceptual and associative learning , 1991 .

[18]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  A two-object / two action test of simultaneous stimulus learning and response learning by observation in the European starling , 1999 .

[19]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[20]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[21]  Jon Evan Del Russo,et al.  Observational learning of discriminative avoidance in hooded rats , 1975 .

[22]  A. Bandura.  Analysis of Modeling Processes. , 1975 .

[23]  J. Templeton.  Learning from others' mistakes: a paradox revisited , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Hilary Oldfield-Box,et al.  Comments on Two Preliminary Studies of “Observation” Learning in the Rat , 1970 .

[25]  A. Russon,et al.  Constraints on great apes' imitation: model and action selectivity in rehabilitant orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) imitation. , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.

[26]  T R Zentall,et al.  Imitative learning in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using the two-action method. , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[27]  N. Mackintosh.  The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .

[28]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Imitation in Rats: Conditions of Occurrence in a Bidirectional Control Procedure , 1994 .