Brain function in the minimally conscious state: A quantitative neurophysiological study

OBJECTIVE To explore possible EEG power spectrum and coherence differences between patients in minimally conscious state (MCS) and patients with severe neurocognitive disorders (SND), who show signs of awareness. We also try to find EEG cortical sources that differentiate between both conditions using LORETA source analysis. METHODS We studied 16 patients with traumatic brain injury (7 MCS, 9 SND; aged 18-49) and compared EEG power spectra, coherence, and LORETA sources at rest for both groups. RESULTS EEG power spectra revealed significant differences in the delta range of both conditions. Patients in MCS showed a notably increased power in this band, compared to SND patients. LORETA analysis showed that posterior sources of delta and theta frequencies had higher amplitude in MCS patients than in SND patients. Regarding fast frequencies, lower source magnitudes in temporal and frontal lobes were found for MCS patients. CONCLUSIONS Our results stress the importance of fronto-temporal-parietal associative cortices within the "awareness-regions" model. Our results also suggest a relation between excess of slow wave activity and diminished level of awareness in brain injury population. SIGNIFICANCE Neurophysiological correlates in brain damaged patients who are severely impaired could be used to assess the integrity of brain areas responsible for awareness.

[1]  C. Granger,et al.  The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. , 1987, Advances in clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  Nicholas D. Schiff,et al.  Cortical function in the persistent vegetative state , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  J. Leon-Carrion,et al.  Dementia Due to Head Trauma: An obscure name for a clear neurocognitive syndrome. , 2002, NeuroRehabilitation.

[4]  N. Nakayama,et al.  Focal brain glucose hypometabolism in patients with neuropsychologic deficits after diffuse axonal injury. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  P. Maquet,et al.  Differences in brain metabolism between patients in vegetative state, minimally conscious state and ‘locked in syndrome’ , 2001, NeuroImage.

[6]  N. Nakayama,et al.  Relationship between regional cerebral metabolism and consciousness disturbance in traumatic diffuse brain injury without large focal lesions: an FDG-PET study with statistical parametric mapping analysis , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[7]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[8]  N. Schiff,et al.  Neurophysiological correlates of persistent vegetative and minimally conscious states , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[9]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Boly,et al.  Auditory processing in severely brain injured patients: differences between the minimally conscious state and the persistent vegetative state. , 2004, Archives of neurology.

[11]  H. Groenewegen,et al.  The prefrontal cortex and the integration of sensory, limbic and autonomic information. , 2000, Progress in brain research.

[12]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders , 2004, The Lancet Neurology.

[13]  Steven Laureys.  The neural correlate of (un)awareness: lessons from the vegetative state , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  J. Victor,et al.  Power spectra and coherence in the EEG of a vegetative patient with severe asymmetric brain damage , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  A. Cantagallo,et al.  The functional assessment measure (FAM) in closed traumatic brain injury outpatients: a Rasch-based psychometric study. , 1998, Journal of outcome measurement.

[16]  C. Borthwick,et al.  Permanent vegetative state: usefulness and limits of a prognostic definition. , 2005, NeuroRehabilitation.

[17]  M. Rappaport,et al.  The disability rating and Coma/Near-Coma scales in evaluating severe head injury , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[18]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[19]  C. Phillips,et al.  Impaired Effective Cortical Connectivity in Vegetative State: Preliminary Investigation Using PET , 1999, NeuroImage.

[20]  F. Fazio,et al.  Regional cerebral metabolism of glucose in comatose and vegetative state patients. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology.

[21]  J. Adams,et al.  Neuropathology in vegetative and severely disabled patients after head injury , 2001, Neurology.

[22]  F. Plum,et al.  Residual cerebral activity and behavioural fragments can remain in the persistently vegetative brain. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  R. Thatcher.  EEG Database-Guided Neurotherapy , 1999 .

[24]  J. Giacino,et al.  The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria , 2002, Neurology.

[25]  Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations in consciousness. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Information processing in severe disorders of consciousness: Vegetative state and minimally conscious state , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  E. John,et al.  The Relevance of QEEG to the Evaluation of Behavioral Disorders and Pharmacological Interventions , 2006, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[28]  Armando Malanda,et al.  Independent Component Analysis as a Tool to Eliminate Artifacts in EEG: A Quantitative Study , 2003, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[29]  Claudio Del Percio,et al.  Mapping distributed sources of cortical rhythms in mild Alzheimer's disease. A multicentric EEG study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-Mode Activity during a Passive Sensory Task: Uncoupled from Deactivation but Impacting Activation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  David A. Kaiser,et al.  Automatic Artifact Detection, Overlapping Windows, and State Transitions , 2000 .

[32]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[33]  M. Boly,et al.  Tracking the recovery of consciousness from coma. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Systematic Regularization of Linear Inverse Solutions of the EEG Source Localization Problem , 2002, NeuroImage.