Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast

Understanding the conditions that promote the maintenance of cooperation is a classic problem in evolutionary biology. The essence of this dilemma is captured by the ‘tragedy of the commons’: how can a group of individuals that exploit resources in a cooperative manner resist invasion by ‘cheaters’ who selfishly use common resources to maximize their individual reproduction at the expense of the group? Here, we investigate this conflict through experimental competitions between isogenic cheater and cooperator strains of yeast with alternative pathways of glucose metabolism, and by using mathematical models of microbial biochemistry. We show that both coexistence and competitive exclusion are possible outcomes of this conflict, depending on the spatial and temporal structure of the environment. Both of these outcomes are driven by trade-offs between the rate and efficiency of conversion of resources into offspring that are mediated by metabolic intermediates.

[1]  T. Bauchop,et al.  The growth of micro-organisms in relation to their energy supply. , 1960, Journal of general microbiology.

[2]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[3]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[4]  R. Axelrod,et al.  The Further Evolution of Cooperation , 1988, Science.

[5]  M. Nowak,et al.  Chaos and the evolution of cooperation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M A Nowak,et al.  Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Duboc,et al.  An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. , 2000, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[8]  B. Crespi The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  M. T. Silva,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae commits to a programmed cell death process in response to acetic acid. , 2001, Microbiology.

[10]  Bernard J. Crespi,et al.  Response from Crespi: The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms , 2001 .

[11]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Cooperation and Competition in the Evolution of ATP-Producing Pathways , 2001, Science.

[12]  S. Schuster,et al.  An example of the prisoner's dilemma in biochemistry , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[13]  G. J. Velicer Social strife in the microbial world. , 2003, Trends in microbiology.

[14]  M. Travisano,et al.  Strategies of microbial cheater control. , 2004, Trends in microbiology.

[15]  Jacky L. Snoep,et al.  Role of Hexose Transport in Control of Glycolytic Flux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  J. Kreft,et al.  Biofilms promote altruism. , 2004, Microbiology.

[17]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Evolution of Cross‐Feeding in Microbial Populations , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[18]  D. Greig,et al.  The Prisoner's Dilemma and polymorphism in yeast SUC genes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Stefan Hohmann,et al.  Switching the mode of metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, EMBO reports.

[20]  S. Schuster,et al.  Game-theoretical approaches to studying the evolution of biochemical systems. , 2005, Trends in biochemical sciences.