Crystal structures and increased stabilization of the protein G variants with switched folding pathways NuG1 and NuG2

We recently described two protein G variants (NuG1 and NuG2) with redesigned first hairpins that were almost twice as stable, folded 100‐fold faster, and had a switched folding mechanism relative to the wild‐type protein. To test the structural accuracy of our design algorithm and to provide insights to the dramatic changes in the kinetics and thermodynamics of folding, we have now determined the crystal structures of NuG1 and NuG2 to 1.8 Å and 1.85 Å, respectively. We find that they adopt hairpin structures that are closer to the computational models than to wild‐type protein G; the RMSD of the NuG1 hairpin to the design model and the wild‐type structure are 1.7 Å and 5.1 Å, respectively. The crystallographic B factor in the redesigned first hairpin of NuG1 is systematically higher than the second hairpin, suggesting that the redesigned region is somewhat less rigid. A second round of structure‐based design yielded new variants of NuG1 and NuG2, which are further stabilized by 0.5 kcal/mole and 0.9 kcal/mole.

[1]  C R Kissinger,et al.  Rapid automated molecular replacement by evolutionary search. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[2]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  β-Hairpin families in globular proteins , 1985, Nature.

[3]  D. Baker,et al.  Critical role of β-hairpin formation in protein G folding , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  David Baker,et al.  Computer-based redesign of a protein folding pathway , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[5]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side‐chain rotamer preferences , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[7]  Stephen L. Mayo,et al.  Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[8]  Lynne Regan,et al.  A Thermodynamic Scale for the , & Sheet Forming Tendencies of the Amino Acids , 1993 .

[9]  J Navaza,et al.  Implementation of molecular replacement in AMoRe. , 2001, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[10]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Protein design automation , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Richard Bonneau,et al.  Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[13]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[14]  P. S. Kim,et al.  High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. , 1998, Science.

[15]  L Regan,et al.  A thermodynamic scale for the beta-sheet forming tendencies of the amino acids. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[16]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[17]  G L Gilliland,et al.  Two crystal structures of the B1 immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G and comparison with NMR. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[18]  R. Sauer,et al.  Sequence space, folding and protein design. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  W. DeGrado,et al.  Protein Design: A Hierarchic Approach , 1995, Science.

[20]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  New strategies in protein design. , 1995, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[21]  L. Regan,et al.  Guidelines for Protein Design: The Energetics of β Sheet Side Chain Interactions , 1995, Science.

[22]  D E McRee,et al.  XtalView/Xfit--A versatile program for manipulating atomic coordinates and electron density. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[23]  P. S. Kim,et al.  Measurement of the β-sheet-forming propensities of amino acids , 1994, Nature.

[24]  S. A. Marshall,et al.  Energy functions for protein design. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[25]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[26]  Kam Y. J. Zhang,et al.  Accurate computer-based design of a new backbone conformation in the second turn of protein L. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  D. Baker,et al.  Improved recognition of native‐like protein structures using a combination of sequence‐dependent and sequence‐independent features of proteins , 1999, Proteins.