Gender group differences on behavior patterns in collaborative problem solving through LEGO

Collaborative learning has been proved to be an effective learning method that can benefit group members more than individual learning. However, these benefits do not extend equally to boys and girls. Many studies have been conducted to explore the effects and features of different gender groups, but they have presented conflicting findings, which possibly resulted from variations in task type and learning environment. In this case study, we focused on collaborative problem solving under a technology practice environment using LEGO to explore gender differences in the composition of three-person groups. In total, 12 fourth-grade students (six males, six females) participated in the experiment and were divided into FFF, FFM, FMM, and MMM groups. Students’ interactions were analyzed to unravel the distributions and the behavior patterns of interactions in the collaborative problem-solving process of each gender group. The results indicate that (1) mixed-gender groups had a more relaxed atmosphere; (2) single-gender groups could reach a consensus—especially, the FFF group had better interpersonal responsiveness; and (3) even though members of female-dominated groups participated in constructing the artifacts more uniformly, the artifacts were of worse quality than the ones made by male-predominated groups.

[1]  Bob Campbell,et al.  Talking Science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching , 2010 .

[2]  Allison Druin,et al.  Shared Storytelling Objects: KidStory Evaluation Report , 2000 .

[3]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[4]  T. Busch,et al.  Gender, Group Composition, Cooperation, and Self-Efficacy in Computer Studies , 1996 .

[5]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Effects of alternate representations of evidential relations on collaborative learning discourse , 1999, CSCL.

[6]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Social Interaction During Computer-based Activities: Comparisons by Number of Sessions, Gender, School-level, Gender Composition of the Group, and Computer-child Ratio , 2009 .

[7]  Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers,et al.  The Effects of Gender Interaction Patterns on Student Participation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation , 2006 .

[8]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[9]  Florence R. Sullivan.  Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding , 2008 .

[10]  Stephen John Norton.  Pedagogies for the engagement of girls in the learning of proportional reasoning through technology practice , 2006 .

[11]  Garry Falloon,et al.  Exploring young students' talk in iPad-supported collaborative learning environments , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Montserrat Castelló,et al.  Prediction of success in teamwork of secondary students , 2013 .

[13]  Mari-Pauliina Vainikainen,et al.  How do engineering attitudes vary by gender and motivation? Attractiveness of outreach science exhibitions in four countries , 2016 .

[14]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[15]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective , 2006 .

[16]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  Productive interaction in the context of computer-supported collaborative learning in science , 1999 .

[17]  Zehui Zhan,et al.  Effects of gender grouping on students' group performance, individual achievements and attitudes in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Cornelia S. Große,et al.  Online collaborative learning in dyads: Effects of knowledge distribution and awareness , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Jean Underwood,et al.  When does gender matter?: Interactions during computer-based problem solving , 2000 .

[20]  C. Howe,et al.  Conceptual knowledge in physics: The role of group interaction in computer-supported teaching , 1992 .

[21]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Analyzing the Learning Process of an Online Role-Playing Discussion Activity , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[23]  Jang Syh-Jong,et al.  A study of students' construction of science knowledge: talk and writing in a collaborative group , 2007 .

[24]  Friedrich W. Hesse,et al.  A Framework for Teachable Collaborative Problem Solving Skills , 2015 .

[25]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  On analysis of collaborative problem solving: an object-oriented approach , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Egbert G. Harskamp,et al.  Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Rolf Rossaint,et al.  Resuscitation training in small-group setting – gender matters , 2013, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.

[28]  Ting-Wen Chang,et al.  The Effect on Pupils' Science Performance and Problem-Solving Ability through Lego: An Engineering Design-based Modeling Approach , 2016, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[29]  Lin Lin,et al.  Collaboration, multi-tasking and problem solving performance in shared virtual spaces , 2016, Journal of Computing in Higher Education.

[30]  Jianxia Du,et al.  Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Ghazi Shukur,et al.  The Effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[32]  James M. Boyle,et al.  A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Emergence of Abstract Representations in Dyad Problem Solving , 1995 .

[34]  Kristen B. Wendell,et al.  Engineering Design‐Based Science, Science Content Performance, and Science Attitudes in Elementary School , 2013 .

[35]  H. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Mediated Activity in the Primary Classroom: Girls, Boys and Computers , 2000 .

[36]  Bo Xie,et al.  Older adults, e-health literacy, and collaborative learning: An experimental study , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..