RF Path and Absorption Loss Estimation for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks in Different Water Environments

Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSN) communication at high frequencies is extremely challenging. The intricacies presented by the underwater environment are far more compared to the terrestrial environment. The prime reason for such intricacies are the physical characteristics of the underwater environment that have a big impact on electromagnetic (EM) signals. Acoustics signals are by far the most preferred choice for underwater wireless communication. Because high frequency signals have the luxury of large bandwidth (BW) at shorter distances, high frequency EM signals cannot penetrate and propagate deep in underwater environments. The EM properties of water tend to resist their propagation and cause severe attenuation. Accordingly, there are two questions that need to be addressed for underwater environment, first what happens when high frequency EM signals operating at 2.4 GHz are used for communication, and second which factors affect the most to high frequency EM signals. To answer these questions, we present real-time experiments conducted at 2.4 GHz in terrestrial and underwater (fresh water) environments. The obtained results helped in studying the physical characteristics (i.e., EM properties, propagation and absorption loss) of underwater environments. It is observed that high frequency EM signals can propagate in fresh water at a shallow depth only and can be considered for a specific class of applications such as water sports. Furthermore, path loss, velocity of propagation, absorption loss and the rate of signal loss in different underwater environments are also calculated and presented in order to understand why EM signals cannot propagate in sea water and oceanic water environments. An optimal solk6ution for underwater communication in terms of coverage distance, bandwidth and nature of communication is presented, along with possible underwater applications of UWSNs at 2.4 GHz.

[1]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[2]  Faisal Karim Shaikh,et al.  Underwater Sensor Network Applications: A Comprehensive Survey , 2015, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[3]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[4]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[5]  James Preisig,et al.  Acoustic propagation considerations for underwater acoustic communications network development , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[6]  Anuj Sehgal,et al.  Variability of available capacity due to the effects of depth and temperature in the underwater acoustic communication channel , 2009, OCEANS 2009-EUROPE.

[7]  Jaime Lloret,et al.  Study of the Optimum Frequency at 2.4GHz ISM Band for Underwater Wireless Ad Hoc Communications , 2012, ADHOC-NOW.

[8]  I. Bankman,et al.  Underwater optical communications systems. Part 2: basic design considerations , 2005, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[9]  Anton Kruger,et al.  RF communications in underwater wireless sensor networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology.

[10]  J. Trumpf,et al.  Frequency, Temperature and Salinity Variation of the Permittivity of Seawater , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[11]  Xianhui Che,et al.  Node pattern simulation of an undersea sensor network using RF electromagnetic communications , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops.

[12]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Designing Wireless Sensor Networks as a Shared Resource for Sustainable Development , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.

[13]  N Nowsheen,et al.  A high data-rate, software-defined underwater acoustic modem , 2010, OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE.

[14]  Xianhui Che,et al.  Re-evaluation of RF electromagnetic communication in underwater sensor networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Jiejun Kong,et al.  The challenges of building mobile underwater wireless networks for aquatic applications , 2006, IEEE Network.

[16]  A. S. Joshi,et al.  DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF NORTH INDIAN OCEAN SEAWATER AT 5 GH Z , 2012 .

[17]  Ghaith Hattab,et al.  An Underwater Wireless Sensor Network with Realistic Radio Frequency Path Loss Model , 2013, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[18]  Mark Rhodes,et al.  Underwater radio frequency communications , 2011, OCEANS 2011 IEEE - Spain.

[19]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[20]  Feng Hong,et al.  USS-TDMA: Self-stabilizing TDMA Algorithm for Underwater Wireless Sensor Network , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology.

[21]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Underwater Wireless Sensor Communications in the 2.4 GHz ISM Frequency Band , 2012, Sensors.

[22]  Matthew N. O. Sadiku,et al.  Elements of Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[23]  A. Al-Shamma'a,et al.  Propagation of electromagnetic waves at MHz frequencies through seawater , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[24]  Davide Anguita,et al.  Optical communication for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: a VHDL-implementation of a Physical Layer 802.15.4 compatible , 2009, OCEANS 2009-EUROPE.

[25]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Underwater Wireless Communications in Freshwater at 2.4 GHz , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[26]  G. Sasi Bhushana Rao,et al.  Path loss analysis of underwater communication systems , 2011, IEEE Technology Students' Symposium.