Hierarchical Learning of Dimensional Biases in Human Categorization

Existing models of categorization typically represent to-be-classified items as points in a multidimensional space. While from a mathematical point of view, an infinite number of basis sets can be used to represent points in this space, the choice of basis set is psychologically crucial. People generally choose the same basis dimensions - and have a strong preference to generalize along the axes of these dimensions, but not "diagonally". What makes some choices of dimension special? We explore the idea that the dimensions used by people echo the natural variation in the environment. Specifically, we present a rational model that does not assume dimensions, but learns the same type of dimensional generalizations that people display. This bias is shaped by exposing the model to many categories with a structure hypothesized to be like those which children encounter. The learning behaviour of the model captures the developmental shift from roughly "isotropic" for children to the axis-aligned generalization that adults show.

[1]  Mark K. Johansen,et al.  Are there representational shifts during category learning? , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[3]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[4]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization. , 1991 .

[5]  D. Aldous Exchangeability and related topics , 1985 .

[6]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[7]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Learning to learn categories , 2009 .

[8]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[9]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Developmental trends in free classification: Evidence for a new conceptualization of perceptual development , 1977 .

[10]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  A Rational Analysis of Rule-Based Concept Learning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Safa R. Zaki,et al.  Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning. , 2005, Psychological review.

[15]  Daniel J. Navarro,et al.  From natural kinds to complex categories , 2006 .

[16]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Describing Visual Scenes using Transformed Dirichlet Processes , 2005, NIPS.

[17]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Bayesian Special Section Learning Overhypotheses with Hierarchical Bayesian Models , 2022 .

[18]  L. Smith,et al.  A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. , 1989, Psychological review.

[19]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  A rule-plus-exception model for classifying objects in continuous-dimension spaces , 1998 .

[20]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.

[22]  D. Blackwell,et al.  Ferguson Distributions Via Polya Urn Schemes , 1973 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. , 1982, Psychological review.

[24]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Human Category Learning: Implications for Backpropagation Models , 1993 .

[25]  Adam N. Sanborn,et al.  Unifying rational models of categorization via the hierarchical Dirichlet process , 2019 .

[26]  D. Medin,et al.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. , 2004, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.