Effective Decision Making in Changeable Spaces, Covering and Discovering Processes: A Habitual Domain Approach

This chapter proposes a model of covering and discovering processes for solving non-trivial decision making problems in changeable spaces, which encom- pass most of the decision making problems that a person or a group of people encounter at individual, family, organization and society levels. The proposed frame- work fully incorporates two important aspects of the real-decision making process that are not fully considered in most of the traditional decision theories: the cogni- tive aspect and the psychological states of the decision makers and their dynamics. Moreover, the proposed model does not assume that the set of alternatives, criteria, outcomes, preferences, etc. are fixed or depend on some probabilistic and/or fuzzy parameter with known probability distribution and/or membership function. The model allows the creation of new ideas and restructuring of the decision parameters to solve problems. Therefore, it is called decision making/optimization in change- able spaces (DM/OCS). DM/OCS is based on Habitual Domain theory, the decision parameters, the concept of competence set and the mental operators 7-8-9 principles of deep knowledge. Some illustrative examples of challenging problems that cannot be solved by traditional decision making/optimization techniques are formulated as DM/OCS problems and solved. Finally, some directions of research are provided in conclusion.

[1]  O. Holsti,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[2]  Ichiro Nishizaki,et al.  Fuzzy Stochastic Multiobjective Programming , 2013 .

[3]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Linear programming and extensions , 1965 .

[4]  Moussa Larbani,et al.  Decision Making and Optimization in Changeable Spaces, a New Paradigm , 2012, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[5]  A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[7]  Po-Lung Yu,et al.  Forming Winning Strategies: An Integrated Theory of Habitual Domains , 1990 .

[8]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[9]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[10]  R. Słowiński,et al.  Stochastic Versus Fuzzy Approaches to Multiobjective Mathematical Programming under Uncertainty , 1990, Theory and Decision Library.

[11]  Moussa Larbani,et al.  Two-Person Second-Order Games, Part 2: Restructuring Operations to Reach a Win-Win Profile , 2009 .

[12]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processing , 2008 .

[13]  Po-Lung Yu,et al.  Marginal analysis for competence set expansion , 1993 .

[14]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. , 1958 .

[15]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[16]  P. Yu Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: "Concepts, Techniques, And Extensions" , 2012 .

[17]  Xavier Gandibleux,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimization: State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic Surveys , 2013 .

[18]  David F. Andersen,et al.  Theories of Decision Making: An Annotated Bibliography , 2015 .

[19]  Po Lung Yu,et al.  Dynamic multiple criteria decision making in changeable spaces: from habitual domains to innovation dynamics , 2012, Ann. Oper. Res..

[20]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[21]  Po-Lung Yu,et al.  Blinds, fuzziness and habitual domain tools in decision making with changeable spaces , 2010 .

[22]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[23]  Gert Jan Hofstede,et al.  Emergent Results of Artificial Economics , 2011 .

[24]  B. Brehmer Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Moussa Larbani,et al.  Two-Person Second-Order Games, Part 1: Formulation and Transition Anatomy , 2009 .

[26]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory , 2009 .

[27]  Mokhtar S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms , 1993 .

[28]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[29]  P. Yu,et al.  A foundation for competence set analysis , 1990 .

[30]  H. Kelley Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[31]  E. W. Adams,et al.  Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting , 1962 .

[32]  M. Larbani,et al.  n-Person Second-Order Games: A Paradigm Shift in Game Theory , 2011, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[33]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[35]  P. L. Yu,et al.  Habitual Domains , 1991, Oper. Res..

[36]  H. Kunzi,et al.  Lectu re Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems , 1975 .

[37]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processings1 , 1962 .

[38]  J. Steinbruner The Cybernetic Theory of Decision: New Dimensions of Political Analysis , 1974 .

[39]  Po-Lung Yu,et al.  Stable habitual domains: existence and implications , 1985 .

[40]  Nils Brunsson My own book review : The Irrational Organization , 2014 .

[41]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.