Binocular Depth Perception without Familiarity Cues

The reported phenomena were obtained through the use of special techniques. (i) All monocular depth and familiarity cues were removed from the stimuli (through the use of randomdot stereo patterns). (ii) The statistical and topological properties of the stimuli were precisely known (since they were generated according to a specific computer program). (iii) Convergence motions of the eye and proprioceptive cues were eliminated (through the use of tachistoscopic illumination). (iv) The time of presentation was under control (through erasure of the persistent afterimages). Under these conditions stereopsis could be studied in its purest form. It was shown that depth can be perceived in the absence of monocular depth and familiarity cues and of all binocular depth cues except for disparity. These findings have important implications for some existing theories of stereopsis and open up areas for further research. Some phenomena based on stereo erasure are reported here for the first time. It has been demonstrated that the perception of ambiguous depth organizations can be influenced, even subliminally, by a preceding unambiguous stimulus. Perhaps the most interesting result is the finding that the correspondence of objects and patterns in the two retinal projections can be established without actual recognition of the objects and patterns. This pattern matching is based on some relatively simple processes of finding connected clusters formed by adjacent points of similar brightness, and the processes seem to be amenable to rigorous analysis.

[1]  E. Lau Versuche über das stereoskopische Sehen , 1922 .

[2]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase Relations upon the Masking of Speech by White Noise , 1948 .

[3]  J. Gibson The perception of visual surfaces. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  R. Efron STEREOSCOPIC VISION I. EFFECT OF BINOCULAR TEMPORAL SUMMATION* , 1957, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  E. M. Cramer,et al.  Creation of Pitch through Binaural Interaction , 1958 .

[6]  B. Julesz Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[7]  L. Wilson The National Reference Library of Science and Invention , 1961, Nature.

[8]  B. Julesz,et al.  Automatic stereoscopic presentation of functions of two variables , 1962 .

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  B. W. White Stimulus-conditions affecting a recently discovered stereoscopic effect. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  K. N. Ogle The Visual Space Sense , 1962, Science.

[12]  J. Swets,et al.  Further Experiments on Learning to Identify Nonverbal Sounds , 1963 .

[13]  B JULESZ,et al.  STEREOPSIS AND BINOCULAR RIVALRY OF CONTOURS. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[14]  P. C. DODWELL,et al.  A Theory of Binocular Fusion , 1963, Nature.

[15]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  Visual Hallucinations during Sensory Deprivation: A Problem of Criteria , 1964, Science.

[16]  T. Crocker,et al.  Poliovirus: Growth in Non-Nucleate Cytoplasm , 1964, Science.

[17]  L. J. Brenner,et al.  Differences in Complement Titers of Serums from Spaced Bleedings in Guinea Pigs , 1964, Science.

[18]  R. Ader Gastric Erosions in the Rat: Effects of Immobilization at Different Points in the Activity Cycle , 1964, Science.

[19]  S. F. Petropulos Ultraviolet Inactivation of Chloroplast Formation in Synchronously Dividing Euglena gracilis , 1964, Science.

[20]  J. Staddon,et al.  Reinforcement as Input: Cyclic Variable-Interval Schedule , 1964, Science.

[21]  P. Gouras,et al.  Primate Retinal Responses: Slow Changes during Repetitive Stimulation with Light , 1964, Science.